How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme
Statement
For , . If , the restriction is the canonical localization map .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sheaf extending the localization basis assignment.
Proof
The extended sheaf agrees with the basis assignment on , so its sections are .
Its restriction along is the prescribed canonical localization map .
If , then , the unique ring of sections on the empty open.
Depends on
Used by
- A nonseparated affine cover can have nonaffine intersection Counterexample
- Finite type need not be locally free Counterexample
- Proper cohomology need not be finite for noncoherent sheaves Counterexample
- Under AC, proper integral finite-type schemes over fields with multiple points are not affine Counterexample
- Module sheaf on an affine scheme Definition
- Principal parts of an invertible sheaf on a curve Definition
- Two-affine projective line and its twists Definition
- Two-affine Mayer–Vietoris on the projective line Example
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open Lemma
- Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials Lemma
- Affine pushforward algebra localizes Lemma
- Affineness from a finite principal cover Lemma
- An affine scheme of finite type over a field has a finitely generated coordinate ring Lemma
- An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open Lemma
- Closed gluing of two projective three-spaces is proper Lemma
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change Lemma
- Finite is affine and local on its target Lemma
- Intersections of affine opens admit principal affine covers Lemma
- Nonzero maps from an invertible sheaf to a locally free sheaf are injective Lemma
- Pushouts of closed immersions exist Lemma
- Schematic closure and agreement on a dense open Lemma
- Structure sheaf of a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is affine-local Lemma
- The spectrum of a finite product ring is the disjoint union of the factor spectra Lemma
- Valuation lifts detect universal closedness Lemma
- Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules Theorem
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings Theorem
- Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra Theorem
- Extension of scalars of a scheme along a field extension Theorem
- Global functions on Spec A recover A Theorem
- High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme Theorem
- Projective n-space has quasi-coherent cohomological dimension at most n Theorem
- Scheme-theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism Theorem
- The associated module sheaf exists Theorem
- The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is Aₚ Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 26.5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)