Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonzero maps from an invertible sheaf to a locally free sheaf are injective

Statement

Let X be an integral scheme (Integral schemes), let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) and let M be a locally free OX-module of finite rank (Locally free sheaves of finite rank). Then every nonzero morphism of OX-modules φ:L→M (Modules on a ringed space) is injective (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integral scheme X, an invertible OX-module L, a locally free OX-module M of finite rank, and a morphism φ:L→M with φ≠0.

[F1]

X is nonempty, reduced and irreducible, and every nonempty affine open subset of X is the spectrum of a domain (Integral schemes).

[F2]

A topological space is irreducible if and only if it is nonempty and every two of its nonempty open subsets have nonempty intersection (Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology, Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces).

[F3]

L is locally free of rank 1, so every point of X has an open neighbourhood on which L is isomorphic to the structure sheaf (Invertible sheaves), and M is locally free of finite rank, so every point of X has an open neighbourhood on which M is isomorphic to OU r for some r≥0 (Locally free sheaves of finite rank).

[F4]

For f∈A the sections of OSpec⁡A on the distinguished open D(f) are Af and restriction is the canonical localisation map A→Af (Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme); in a localisation r1=0 holds exactly when ur=0 for some u in the multiplicative set, and the localisation map of a commutative ring R is injective exactly when no element of the multiplicative set annihilates a nonzero element (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).

[F5]

If U=Spec⁡A is affine and W⊆U is open with p∈W, then there is h∈A with p∈D(h)⊆W (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it), and the morphism induced by A→Ah identifies Spec⁡(Ah) with the open subscheme D(h) of U, so D(h) is affine with ring Ah (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open).

[F6]

A sequence of sheaves of abelian groups is exact if and only if every stalk sequence is exact (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk), and the kernel sheaf of a morphism is computed objectwise (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).

[F7]

Two morphisms of sheaves with equal stalk maps are equal (Morphisms of sheaves are determined by their maps on stalks), so a morphism is zero if and only if all of its stalk maps are zero, and a morphism that vanishes on every member of an open cover is zero (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is not used: the arguments below select a chart through each individual point and use only the localisation criteria of [F4]; no family of choices over an infinite index set is made.

Proof

technique · direct; reduce to affine charts, propagate vanishing of the morphism from one chart to all charts by irreducibility, then test injectivity on stalks
1.1F1F2F3F5

Setup. By [F1] the scheme X is nonempty and irreducible, so by [F2] any two nonempty open subsets of X meet; by [F3] the open sets on which L is trivial and the open sets on which M is free form two open covers of X, so for a given x∈X we may choose an affine open U0∋x, intersect it with such a trivialising and such a freeing open set, and apply [F5] to obtain a distinguished open D(h)⊆U0 containing x on which both L and M are free; D(h) is affine with ring a domain by [F1]. The resulting adapted charts U=Spec⁡A, with A a domain, L∣U≅OU and M∣U≅OU r, cover X.

1.2F4

Chart dictionary. Fix an adapted chart U=Spec⁡A and trivialisations L∣U≅OU, M∣U≅OU r; these identify Hom⁡OU(L∣U,M∣U) with OU(U) r=A r, and φ∣U corresponds to an element m=(a1,…,ar)∈A r acting by multiplication; thus φ∣U=0 if and only if m=0. If m≠0, choose i with ai≠0 and let D(f)⊆U be distinguished; A is a domain and A→Af is injective when f≠0 by [F4], so the image of ai in the domain Af is nonzero, and a section s∈OU(D(f))=Af with s⋅ai=0 must be s=0; as the distinguished opens cover every open subset of U, multiplication by m is injective, that is, φ∣U is injective.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.2

Vanishing propagates. Suppose φ∣U0=0 for one adapted chart U0; let V=Spec⁡B be any adapted chart and let mV∈B s correspond to φ∣V as in step 1.2. Since V∩U0 is nonempty by [F2], [F5] supplies a distinguished open D(h)⊆V∩U0; there φ∣D(h)=0, and restriction of the element mV to D(h) is its image in (B s)h by [F4], so that image is zero; the zero criterion of [F4] gives hkmV=0 in B s for some k≥0, and since B is a domain and D(h)≠∅ forces h≠0, this yields mV=0 and hence φ∣V=0 by step 1.2. The adapted charts cover X, so φ=0 by [F7].

3.1step 1.2step 2.1

Stalks are injective. Now suppose φ≠0. By the contrapositive of step 2.1, φ∣U≠0 for every adapted chart U; by step 1.2 the corresponding element m is nonzero and φ∣U is injective. Every point x∈X lies in an adapted chart U, and the stalk map φx is the stalk of φ∣U at x, hence is injective.

4.1F6F8step 3.1∎

Conclusion. The kernel sheaf ker⁡φ is the sheaf of abelian groups with (ker⁡φ)x=ker⁡(φx) by [F6]; all these stalks are zero by step 3.1, so every section of ker⁡φ over every open set is zero and φ is injective; the argument made no use of the Axiom of Choice beyond the fixed data recorded in [F8].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources