Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Torsion-free coherent modules on a smooth curve are locally free

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the DVR and coherence suppliers. Let k be a field, let C be a smooth curve over k (Curves over a field) and let M be a coherent OC-module (Coherent module sheaves). Then:

  1. M is finite locally free (Locally free sheaves of finite rank) if and only if M is torsion-free in the following local sense: there are no open U⊆C, nonzero m∈M(U) and nonzero a∈OC(U) with a m=0.
  2. If M is not torsion-free in that sense, then M has a nonzero global section; in particular a nonzero coherent module killed locally by a nonzerodivisor has a nonzero global section.
  3. A subsheaf of a locally free OC-module is torsion-free, and a coherent torsion-free OC-module is finite locally free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, a smooth curve C over k, and a coherent OC-module M.

[F1]

C is a nonempty integral scheme, so C is irreducible and every two nonempty open subsets of C meet. Every nonempty open W⊆C has an injective restriction map Γ(W,OC)→k(C): on any affine open Spec⁡A⊆W, this is the injection from the domain A into its fraction field. Thus a nonzero regular section on W has nonzero image in k(C), and its germ at every point of W maps to that same nonzero element. Every point of C is either its generic point or a closed point (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite); at a closed point x the local ring OC,x is a discrete valuation ring, hence a principal ideal domain (Curves over a field, Integral schemes, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Every DVR is a PID), while at the generic point η the local ring OC,η=k(C) is the function field, a field and hence also a principal ideal domain; in either case OC,x is a principal ideal domain.

[F2]

A finitely generated torsion-free module over a principal ideal domain is free (Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free).

[F3]

M is quasi-coherent of finite type; a stalk relation axmx=0 with ax,mx≠0 is represented by sections a,m over some open neighbourhood with am=0, and a section with nonzero germ at a point is a nonzero section (The stalk of a presheaf at a point, Modules on a ringed space).

[F4]

Coherent modules on the locally Noetherian scheme C are finitely presented, and for a finitely presented quasi-coherent module the locus of points at which the stalk is free of a given rank is open, with the module free of that rank on a neighbourhood of each such point (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Openness of the finite free locus).

[F5]

Sections of a sheaf over two open sets that agree on the intersection glue to a section over the union, and a section is nonzero once it is nonzero on one member of a cover (A sheaf on a topological space, Subsheaves).

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice enters only through the coherence and local-ring suppliers of [F1] and [F4]; the points selected below are chosen from sets known to be nonempty, and the proof makes no further choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F7]

Every proper closed subset of an integral finite-type curve is a finite set of closed points, and every point other than the generic point is closed (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite).

Proof

technique · direct; reduce the torsion-freeness question to the stalks, which are finitely generated modules over principal ideal domains (discrete valuation rings at closed points, the function field at the generic point), and use the structure of modules over a principal ideal domain
1.1F1

Local freeness implies torsion-freeness. Suppose M is finite locally free and let U, m≠0, a≠0 satisfy am=0. Since m≠0, choose x∈U with mx≠0. By [F1], the nonzero section a maps to a nonzero element of k(C), and its germ ax maps to that same element, so ax≠0. Shrink to an open neighbourhood of x on which M is free. The relation gives axmx=0 in a free module over the domain OC,x; multiplication by the nonzero scalar ax is injective coordinatewise, forcing mx=0, a contradiction. So a finite locally free module has no such a,m.

1.2F1F2F3

Torsion-freeness implies free stalks. Suppose M has no relation am=0 as in the statement, and let x∈C. The stalk Mx is a finitely generated module over the principal ideal domain OC,x (a discrete valuation ring when x is closed, the field k(C) when x is the generic point) [F1], and it is torsion-free: if axmx=0 in Mx with ax≠0 and mx≠0, then by [F3] the relation is represented over an open U by nonzero sections a,m with am=0, contradicting the hypothesis. By [F2] the stalk Mx is free, say of rank rx≥0.

1.3F1F5F7

Part (2). Suppose am=0 with U open, m∈M(U) nonzero and a∈OC(U) nonzero. Choose x∈U with mx≠0, and then an affine open neighbourhood W=Spec⁡A with x∈W⊆U. The restriction a∣W is nonzero by [F1]. Let Z={y∈W:ay∈my}, the vanishing locus of the residue of a∣W; it is the proper closed subset V(a∣W) of W, proper because a∣W has nonzero image in the function field [F1]. Since W is an integral curve, [F7] says that Z is a finite set of closed points of W. None is the generic point of C, and [F7] also says every such point is closed in C, so Z is a finite closed subset of C. Put V=C∖Z. Then V is open and W∪V=C. On W∩V=W∖Z, the residue of a is nonzero at every point, hence a is a unit in every stalk and m∣W∩V=0. The sections m∣W and 0 over V agree on the intersection, so by [F5] they glue to a global section of M, which is nonzero because mx≠0.

2.1F4step 1.1step 1.2

Conclusion of (1). If M is torsion-free then by step 1.2 every stalk is free; by [F4] each point has an open neighbourhood on which M is free of the rank of its stalk, so M is finite locally free. With step 1.1 this proves the equivalence (1).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

Part (3). A subsheaf N⊆E of a locally free module E is torsion-free: a relation am=0 with m≠0 and a≠0 in N is also a relation in E, which is impossible by step 1.1; and a coherent torsion-free module is finite locally free by step 2.1.

4.1F6step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Step 2.1 proves (1), step 1.3 proves (2) and step 3.1 proves (3). The points chosen in steps 1.1 and 1.3 exist because the corresponding sections are nonzero; the Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources