Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Openness of the finite free locus

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a scheme and let F be a finitely presented quasi-coherent OX-module (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves). For r≥0 let Zr(F)={x∈X:Fx≅OX,x r as OX,x-modules} be the locus where the stalk is free of rank r (Locally free sheaves of finite rank).

Then:

  1. Zr(F) is open in X.
  2. Every x∈Zr(F) has an open neighbourhood V with F∣V≅OV r; in particular F is locally free of rank r on Zr(F).
  3. The hypothesis cannot be weakened to pointwise fibre dimension: for a field k, the ring A=k[t]/(t2) and the module M=A/(t), the sheaf F=M~ on X=Spec⁡A has dim⁡κ(x)F(x)=1 at the unique point x∈X, while Fx≅k is not free of rank 1 over OX,x=A and F is not locally free of rank 1. Thus the vanishing of the kernel of the presentation OX⟶F at x, equivalently freeness of the stalk, is the check that the fibre dimension alone does not supply.

No Noetherian hypothesis on X is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a scheme X, a finitely presented quasi-coherent OX-module F, an integer r≥0 and a point x∈Zr(F).

[F1]

Local form of finite presentation: there is an affine open U=Spec⁡A containing x with F∣U≅M~ for a finitely presented A-module M; a finitely presented module is isomorphic to An/K for a finitely generated submodule K⊆An, so it admits an exact sequence Am→An→M→0 with m finite. Moreover a morphism of OU-modules Ar~→M~ is induced by its component on global sections, an A-linear map Ar→M, and Ar~=OUr (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, Finitely presented modules and finitely presented algebras, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme).

[F2]

Local freeness: F is locally free of rank r near a point if some open neighbourhood is isomorphic to Or (Locally free sheaves of finite rank).

[F3]

Nakayama for finite type quasi-coherent modules: (i) F(x)=0 implies F vanishes on an open neighbourhood of x; (ii) if s1,…,sr∈F(W) are sections over a neighbourhood W of x whose images in the fibre F(x) span it over κ(x), then some affine open U⊆W containing x is such that s1∣U,…,sr∣U generate F∣U, that is, the induced morphism OUr→F∣U is an epimorphism (Geometric Nakayama for finite-type sheaves).

[F4]

The fibre is F(x)=Fx⊗OX,xκ(x)=Fx/mxFx, a vector space over the residue field; for Fx≅OX,xr it is κ(x)r, of dimension r (Fibre of a module sheaf at a point).

[F5]

Localisation is exact: for an A-module map ψ and a prime q, the canonical map (ker⁡ψ)q→ker⁡(ψq) is an isomorphism, and (im⁡ψ)q=im⁡(ψq) (Localisation of modules is exact, Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels).

[F6]

Elementary algebra over a commutative ring A: [algebra] (a) if N is finitely presented and ψ:Ar→N is surjective, then ker⁡ψ is finitely generated: from a presentation Am→αAn→βN→0 form the fibre product P={(v,w)∈Ar⊕An:ψ(v)=β(w)}. For each basis vector ej of An, choose vj∈Ar with ψ(vj)=β(ej); extending ej↦(vj,ej) linearly gives a section An→P of P→An. The kernel of that projection is ker⁡ψ, so P≅ker⁡ψ⊕An. For each basis vector ui of Ar, choose wi∈An with β(wi)=ψ(ui); extending ui↦(ui,wi) linearly gives a section Ar→P of P→Ar. The kernel of this projection is ker⁡β=im⁡α, which is finitely generated. Thus P≅im⁡α⊕Ar is finitely generated, and its direct summand ker⁡ψ is finitely generated as well; (b) if K is finitely generated and Kq=0, then Kg=0 for some g∉q (clear denominators on a finite generating set); (c) if R is a nonzero local ring and Rr→Rr is a surjective R-linear map, then it is an isomorphism: its matrix has image modulo the maximal ideal all of κr, hence invertible reduction, hence unit determinant.

[F7]

Restriction of an associated sheaf: for V=Spec⁡B affine and a B-module N, and for g∈B, the restriction (N~)∣D(g) is (Ng)~, the associated sheaf of the localisation of N, and Br~=OVr (An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open, Module sheaf on an affine scheme).

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice). It is inherited through the associated-sheaf construction in [F1] and [F7] and the sheaf Nakayama supplier [F3].

Proof technique: direct; lift a basis of the free stalk to finitely many sections, apply Nakayama to obtain an epimorphism Or→F on an affine neighbourhood, show its kernel is finitely generated, and kill the kernel after inverting one element.

Proof

1.1F1F4

Setup at a point of Zr: let x∈X with Fx≅OX,xr; by [F1] choose an affine open U=Spec⁡A containing x with F∣U≅M~ for a finitely presented A-module M, and let p⊆A be the prime with x=p. Then Mp≅Apr, and by [F4] the fibre F(p)=Mp⊗Apκ(p)=M⊗Aκ(p) is κ(p)r, of dimension r.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

A surjection on an affine neighbourhood: choose a finite generating list of M. Its images span M⊗Aκ(p) over κ(p), since every tensor is a finite sum of scalar multiples of those images. Extract a basis from this finite spanning list and denote the corresponding elements of M by m1,…,mr. The mi are sections of F over U, so [F3(ii)] provides an affine open V⊆U containing x such that the induced morphism φ:OVr→F∣V is an epimorphism; after further shrinking V to a finite-presentation chart supplied by [F1], it remains an epimorphism. For r=0 it says that F(p)=0.

3.1F1F6step 2.1

The kernel of φ is finitely generated: write V=Spec⁡B and F∣V≅N~ with N a finitely presented B-module; by [F1] the epimorphism φ corresponds to a B-linear surjection ψ:Br→N, and [F6(a)] shows that K=ker⁡ψ is finitely generated.

4.1F5F6F3step 3.1

The map on stalks is an isomorphism: let q⊆B be the prime with x=q. Both Bqr and Nq are free of rank r over the local ring Bq: the first is clear, and for the second Fx≅OX,xr=Bqr while Fx=Nq because F∣V≅N~. The localised map ψq:Bqr→Nq is surjective, so by [F6(c)] it is an isomorphism; in particular Kq=ker⁡(ψq)=0 by [F5]. If r=0 this says that the stalk vanishes, and F(p)=0, so by [F3(i)] F vanishes on a neighbourhood of x and F is free of rank 0 there; assume r≥1 from now on.

5.1F6F7step 3.1step 4.1

Killing the kernel: since K is finitely generated and Kq=0, [F6(b)] gives g∈B∖q with Kg=0; then ψg:Bgr→Ng is surjective with zero kernel, hence an isomorphism. Restricting the isomorphism F∣V≅N~ to D(g) and using [F7], F∣D(g)≅(Ng)~≅(Bgr)~=OD(g)r, and D(g) is an open neighbourhood of x in X.

6.1F2step 5.1

Claims 1 and 2: the argument of steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 applies to every x∈Zr(F) and produces an open neighbourhood D(g) of x with F∣D(g)≅OD(g)r; conversely, if F∣W≅OWr then Fy≅OX,yr for every y∈W, so such a W is contained in Zr(F). Hence Zr(F) is open and is covered by the opens D(g) on which F is free of rank r, proving claims 1 and 2.

7.1F1F8step 6.1

Claim 3, sharpness: let k be a field, A=k[t]/(t2) with class ε of t, so that ε2=0 and ε≠0, and M=A/(ε)=k; let x be the unique point of X=Spec⁡A, so that OX,x=A and κ(x)=k. Then F(x)=M⊗Ak=M/εM=k, of dimension 1, while Fx=M=k is not free of rank 1 over A: a free module of rank 1 is isomorphic to A, whose dimension over k is 2, and moreover ε annihilates every element of M while ε≠0 in A. The kernel of the surjection OX→F that sends 1 to the class of 1∈M is the subsheaf (ε)~, nonzero at x; thus the fibre dimension 1 and the vanishing of this kernel are genuinely different conditions, and x∉Z1(F) even though dim⁡κ(x)F(x)=1 and the set {x:dim⁡F(x)=1} happens to be all of X. This proves claim 3.

8.1F1F3F7F9step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Choice accounting: all selections are finite: the r sections m1,…,mr in step 2.1, the finitely many generators of K in step 3.1 and the finitely many denominators in step 5.1. The assumed Axiom of Choice [F9] is consumed through the associated-sheaf machinery of [F1] and [F7] and through [F3(ii)] at step 2.1 (or [F3(i)] for r=0 at step 4.1); the local argument itself makes no new arbitrary-index selection. No Noetherian hypothesis is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources