How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Openness of the finite free locus
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a scheme and let be a finitely presented quasi-coherent -module (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves). For let be the locus where the stalk is free of rank (Locally free sheaves of finite rank).
Then:
- is open in .
- Every has an open neighbourhood with ; in particular is locally free of rank on .
- The hypothesis cannot be weakened to pointwise fibre dimension: for a field , the ring and the module , the sheaf on has at the unique point , while is not free of rank over and is not locally free of rank . Thus the vanishing of the kernel of the presentation at , equivalently freeness of the stalk, is the check that the fibre dimension alone does not supply.
No Noetherian hypothesis on is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a scheme , a finitely presented quasi-coherent -module , an integer and a point .
Local form of finite presentation: there is an affine open containing with for a finitely presented -module ; a finitely presented module is isomorphic to for a finitely generated submodule , so it admits an exact sequence with finite. Moreover a morphism of -modules is induced by its component on global sections, an -linear map , and (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves, Finitely presented modules and finitely presented algebras, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme).
Local freeness: is locally free of rank near a point if some open neighbourhood is isomorphic to (Locally free sheaves of finite rank).
Nakayama for finite type quasi-coherent modules: (i) implies vanishes on an open neighbourhood of ; (ii) if are sections over a neighbourhood of whose images in the fibre span it over , then some affine open containing is such that generate , that is, the induced morphism is an epimorphism (Geometric Nakayama for finite-type sheaves).
The fibre is , a vector space over the residue field; for it is , of dimension (Fibre of a module sheaf at a point).
Localisation is exact: for an -module map and a prime , the canonical map is an isomorphism, and (Localisation of modules is exact, Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels).
Elementary algebra over a commutative ring : [algebra] (a) if is finitely presented and is surjective, then is finitely generated: from a presentation form the fibre product . For each basis vector of , choose with ; extending linearly gives a section of . The kernel of that projection is , so . For each basis vector of , choose with ; extending linearly gives a section of . The kernel of this projection is , which is finitely generated. Thus is finitely generated, and its direct summand is finitely generated as well; (b) if is finitely generated and , then for some (clear denominators on a finite generating set); (c) if is a nonzero local ring and is a surjective -linear map, then it is an isomorphism: its matrix has image modulo the maximal ideal all of , hence invertible reduction, hence unit determinant.
Restriction of an associated sheaf: for affine and a -module , and for , the restriction is , the associated sheaf of the localisation of , and (An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open, Module sheaf on an affine scheme).
The example of claim 3 is available: is a quotient ring of the polynomial ring and is a quotient module (The quotient ring with , The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution, Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).
The Axiom of Choice is the choice-function principle (The Axiom of Choice). It is inherited through the associated-sheaf construction in [F1] and [F7] and the sheaf Nakayama supplier [F3].
Proof technique: direct; lift a basis of the free stalk to finitely many sections, apply Nakayama to obtain an epimorphism on an affine neighbourhood, show its kernel is finitely generated, and kill the kernel after inverting one element.
Proof
Setup at a point of : let with ; by [F1] choose an affine open containing with for a finitely presented -module , and let be the prime with . Then , and by [F4] the fibre is , of dimension .
A surjection on an affine neighbourhood: choose a finite generating list of . Its images span over , since every tensor is a finite sum of scalar multiples of those images. Extract a basis from this finite spanning list and denote the corresponding elements of by . The are sections of over , so [F3(ii)] provides an affine open containing such that the induced morphism is an epimorphism; after further shrinking to a finite-presentation chart supplied by [F1], it remains an epimorphism. For it says that .
The kernel of is finitely generated: write and with a finitely presented -module; by [F1] the epimorphism corresponds to a -linear surjection , and [F6(a)] shows that is finitely generated.
The map on stalks is an isomorphism: let be the prime with . Both and are free of rank over the local ring : the first is clear, and for the second while because . The localised map is surjective, so by [F6(c)] it is an isomorphism; in particular by [F5]. If this says that the stalk vanishes, and , so by [F3(i)] vanishes on a neighbourhood of and is free of rank there; assume from now on.
Killing the kernel: since is finitely generated and , [F6(b)] gives with ; then is surjective with zero kernel, hence an isomorphism. Restricting the isomorphism to and using [F7], , and is an open neighbourhood of in .
Claims 1 and 2: the argument of steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 applies to every and produces an open neighbourhood of with ; conversely, if then for every , so such a is contained in . Hence is open and is covered by the opens on which is free of rank , proving claims 1 and 2.
Claim 3, sharpness: let be a field, with class of , so that and , and ; let be the unique point of , so that and . Then , of dimension , while is not free of rank over : a free module of rank is isomorphic to , whose dimension over is , and moreover annihilates every element of while in . The kernel of the surjection that sends to the class of is the subsheaf , nonzero at ; thus the fibre dimension and the vanishing of this kernel are genuinely different conditions, and even though and the set happens to be all of . This proves claim 3.
Choice accounting: all selections are finite: the sections in step 2.1, the finitely many generators of in step 3.1 and the finitely many denominators in step 5.1. The assumed Axiom of Choice [F9] is consumed through the associated-sheaf machinery of [F1] and [F7] and through [F3(ii)] at step 2.1 (or [F3(i)] for at step 4.1); the local argument itself makes no new arbitrary-index selection. No Noetherian hypothesis is used.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves
- Locally free sheaves of finite rank
- Geometric Nakayama for finite-type sheaves
- Fibre of a module sheaf at a point
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- Modules on a ringed space
- Schemes
- Finitely presented modules and finitely presented algebras
- Localisation of modules is exact
- Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels
- An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open
- Module sheaf on an affine scheme
- The quotient ring $R/I$ with $(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I$
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
- Quotient module $M/N$ with scalar multiplication on additive cosets
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, §§26.5, 26.7, 26.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Chapters 6, 14, 17 (standard reference, not scraped)