How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fibre of a module sheaf at a point
Definition
Let be a locally ringed space, let be an -module in the sense of Modules on a ringed space, and let . Write for the stalk of at (The stalk of a presheaf at a point); it is a module over the local ring , and the residue field is with maximal ideal (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme). The fibre of at is the tensor product of modules over the ring (The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums) The tensor product carries the -module structure induced by the scalar action on the second factor, so is a vector space over the residue field .
Right exactness of the tensor product (Tensoring is right exact) applied to the exact sequence identifies this vector space with the quotient of the stalk by the submodule :
The fibre and the stalk are different objects: is a module over the local ring and need not be a vector space, while is a vector space over equipped with a canonical surjection . For the zero module one has and at every point; for one has at every point. The construction is functorial: a morphism of -modules induces a -linear map for every , and restriction to an open gives for .
Depends on
Used by
- Euler characteristic in a proper flat family is locally constant Corollary
- Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions Corollary
- Finite type need not be locally free Counterexample
- Stalk and fibre are different Counterexample
- Cohomology and base-change map Definition
- A coherent closed-point skyscraper Example
- Fitting ideals of a diagonal two-by-two presentation Example
- The rank-zero bundle Example
- Geometric Nakayama for finite-type sheaves Lemma
- Base change requires its actual map and hypotheses Remark
- Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families Theorem
- Fitting ideals control fibre generator loci Theorem
- Openness of the finite free locus Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, §§26.5, 26.7, 26.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Chapters 6, 14, 17 (standard reference, not scraped)