Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A vector bundle on the projective line has a line subbundle of maximal degree

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cohomology, local-DVR, and divisor-degree suppliers. Let k be a field, put X=Pk1, and let E be a nonzero finite locally free OX-module of rank r≥1 (Locally free sheaves of finite rank). Then the set of integers n with H0(X,E(n)) nonzero is nonempty and bounded below, so it has a minimum a; putting b:=−a, one has H0(X,E(−b)) nonzero, H0(X,E(−b−1))=0, and every nonzero morphism OX(b)→E is injective, so its image is a line subbundle of E of degree b. Moreover no line subbundle of E has degree greater than b: E contains a line subbundle of maximal degree b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the scheme X=Pk1, and a nonzero finite locally free OX-module E of rank r≥1.

[F1]

X=Pk1≅Proj⁡k[x0,x1] is projective over Spec⁡k in the H-projective convention, by the identity embedding X↪Pk1 (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Projective morphisms before Proj, Twisting sheaf on Proj).

[F2]

The twisting sheaf OX(1) is invertible (Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings, Twisting sheaf on Proj). The identity presentation of [F1] exhibits OX(1) as relatively very ample over Spec⁡k, the sections x0,x1 giving the identity morphism X→Pk1 (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative projective space from standard charts); hence OX(1) is ample (Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).

[F3]

For a coherent OX-module F there is m0 with F⊗OX(m) globally generated for every m≥m0 (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists, Global generation by the evaluation map). A globally generated nonzero module has a nonzero global section, because global generation says that the images of the global sections generate every stalk, and F≠0 has a nonzero stalk (Global generation by the evaluation map).

[F4]

E is coherent and H0(X,E) is a finite-dimensional k-vector space: E is locally free hence quasi-coherent of finite type, X is finite type over the field k, hence locally Noetherian, and coherent modules on a locally Noetherian scheme form an abelian category (Coherent module sheaves, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme); finiteness of H0 is the proper finiteness statement (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field).

[F5]

H0(X,F)≅Γ(X,F) (Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections), a global section s of a module F gives the morphism s♯:OX→F, a↦a⋅s∣U, and conversely φ↦φX(1); these are inverse, so Γ(X,F)≅Hom⁡OX(OX,F) (Modules on a ringed space). Global sections form a left exact functor: an injective morphism F→G induces an injective map H0(X,F)→H0(X,G) (Global sections are left exact but need not preserve epimorphisms).

[F6]

For every d∈Z, dim⁡kH0(X,OX(d))=d+1 for d≥0 and =0 for d<0 (Global sections of projective twists).

[F7]

Every nonzero morphism from an invertible sheaf to the finite locally free module E is injective (Nonzero maps from an invertible sheaf to a locally free sheaf are injective, Invertible sheaves).

[F8]

Twists are defined by F(m)=F⊗OX(m), with F(m)⊗OX(n)≅F(m+n) and (F(m))(n)≅F(m+n), so twisting by OX(m) is functorial and carries nonzero morphisms to nonzero morphisms (Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf, Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings).

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the cohomology and global-generation suppliers [F3], [F4] and through the smooth-curve DVR and divisor-degree/Picard suppliers in [F10]; no additional choice is used in the local extension or basis argument (The Axiom of Choice).

[F10]

For every closed point p of the smooth proper curve X, the local ring OX,p is a discrete valuation ring with a uniformizer π (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings). The closed point divisor [p] is effective Cartier; near p its equation can be taken to be π, and away from p its equation is 1. Its associated invertible sheaf OX(p) is locally π−1OX near p and is OX off p (Cartier divisor, Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). The degree homomorphism sends [OX(p)] to d=[κ(p):k]>0, and every invertible sheaf of degree j on X is isomorphic to OX(j) (The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve, The Picard group of the projective line). In particular OX(b)≅OX(b[∞]), the Cartier tensor/addition supplier identifies OX(b[∞])⊗OX(p) with OX(b[∞]+[p]), and that line has degree b+d; Picard classification identifies it with OX(b+d) (Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, The Picard group of the projective line).

Proof

technique · direct; produce sections in high degree by global generation, bound the degrees carrying sections below by comparison with $H^0(E)$, and take the minimum
1.1F1F2F3F4

Nonemptiness of the section degrees. By [F4] the module E is coherent, so [F3] applies with the ample invertible sheaf OX(1) of [F2] and provides m0 with E(m) globally generated for all m≥m0. Since E≠0 and X is nonempty, some stalk of E(m) is nonzero, and global generation exhibits a global section with nonzero germ; hence H0(X,E(m))≠0 for every m≥m0.

2.1F4F5F6F7F8

Boundedness below. Suppose H0(X,E(n))≠0 and let s≠0 be a global section. By [F5] the section s is a nonzero morphism s♯:OX→E(n); twisting by OX(−n) yields a nonzero morphism OX(−n)→E by [F8], which is injective by [F7]. The left exact functor H0 of [F5] therefore gives an injection H0(X,OX(−n))↪H0(X,E), so dim⁡kH0(X,OX(−n))≤h0(E) with h0(E):=dim⁡kH0(X,E)<∞ by [F4]. If n≤0, then by [F6] the left side is −n+1, so −n+1≤h0(E), that is n≥1−h0(E). If n≥1, then n≥1; and since h0(E)≥0 we get n≥1−h0(E) in this case too. Hence every n with H0(X,E(n))≠0 satisfies n≥B for the integer B:=1−h0(E), and the set of such n is nonempty by step 1.1 and bounded below.

3.1step 2.1

The extremal degree. The set S={n∈Z:H0(X,E(n))≠0} is a nonempty subset of Z bounded below, so it has a minimum a. Put b:=−a. Then H0(X,E(−b))=H0(X,E(a))≠0, and H0(X,E(−b−1))=H0(X,E(a−1))=0, since a−1∉S by minimality.

4.1F7F10step 3.1

The maximal map is a subbundle. Fix any nonzero morphism φ:OX(b)→E. It is injective by [F7]. Let p be a closed point and choose local frames for OX(b) and E near p; write the coefficient vector of φ in these frames as (q1,…,qr). Suppose every qi lies in the maximal ideal of OX,p. By [F10], this local ring is a DVR with uniformizer π, so every qi/π is regular at p. After shrinking a neighborhood U of p, these quotients are regular sections and OX(p)∣U=π−1OU. Define a morphism OX(b)⊗OX(p)∣U→E∣U by sending the frame e⊗π−1 to φ(e)/π. On X∖{p} use the identification OX(p)=OX and the original φ. On the overlap U∖{p}, π is a unit and the maps agree, so they glue to a global morphism OX(b)⊗OX(p)→E. It is nonzero because its restriction at the generic point agrees with φ. By [F10] its source is isomorphic to OX(b+d) for d=[κ(p):k]>0. Thus H0(X,E(−b−d))≠0, contradicting minimality of a=−b. Therefore at least one qi is a unit at every closed point p. On a neighborhood where that coefficient remains a unit, elementary row operations make the image a direct summand of E, so the quotient is locally free there. At the generic point the nonzero map is an inclusion of a one-dimensional subspace into a vector space and is likewise a direct summand after restricting to a neighborhood. Hence φ has locally free quotient and its image is a line subbundle of degree b. Since φ was arbitrary, every nonzero map OX(b)→E has this property.

4.2F5F8F10step 3.1

Maximality. Let L⊆E be any line subbundle of degree d. By the Picard classification in [F10], L≅OX(d). Its inclusion is nonzero, so after twisting by OX(−d) it gives a nonzero morphism OX→E(−d) by [F8], hence a nonzero global section of E(−d) by [F5]. Thus −d∈S. By step 3.1, −d≥a=−b, so d≤b: no line subbundle has degree greater than b.

5.1F9step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that S is nonempty and bounded below, step 3.1 produces its minimum a with b=−a and the two vanishing statements, step 4.1 proves that every nonzero maximal-degree map has locally free quotient, and step 4.2 proves maximality among line subbundles. Choice is inherited only from the suppliers recorded in [F9].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

182 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources