Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The quotient by a maximal line subbundle is locally free

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cohomology and curve suppliers. Let E be a finite locally free OPk1-module of rank r≥2 and let φ:OPk1(b)→E be a nonzero morphism with b maximal as in A vector bundle on the projective line has a line subbundle of maximal degree, so that H0(Pk1,E(−b−1))=0. Let F:=E/OPk1(b) be the cokernel of φ. Then F is a finite locally free OPk1-module of rank r−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, a finite locally free module E of rank r≥2 on X=Pk1, and a nonzero maximal-degree morphism φ:OX(b)→E.

[F1]

φ is injective, H0(X,E(−b))≠0 and H0(X,E(−b−1))=0 (A vector bundle on the projective line has a line subbundle of maximal degree).

[F2]

Twisting is F(m)=F⊗OX(m), with canonical isomorphisms F(m)⊗OX(n)≅F(m+n); each OX(m) is invertible with OX(m)⊗OX(−m)≅OX, so twisting by OX(m) is an equivalence of categories with inverse twisting by OX(−m) and preserves exact sequences of OX-modules; if L is invertible and L∣U is free on a frame g, then s↦s⊗g is an isomorphism F∣U→(F⊗L)∣U (Twists of a quasi-coherent sheaf, Invertible sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Exact sequences of sheaves).

[F3]

H0(X,OX(−1))=0 and H1(X,OX(−1))=0 (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists), and a short exact sequence of modules gives a long exact sequence of cohomology (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology).

[F4]

X is locally Noetherian, being covered by the spectra of the Noetherian rings k[t] and k[u] (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, Two-affine projective line and its twists). On a locally Noetherian scheme finite locally free modules and invertible modules are coherent; cokernels of morphisms of coherent modules are coherent; and every twist of a coherent module is coherent, because coherence is local and on an open set on which OX(1) is trivial the twist is isomorphic to the original module (Coherent module sheaves, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves).

[F5]

X is covered by the two standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[t] and U1=Spec⁡k[u] with u=t−1, and on each chart every twisting sheaf OX(d) is free on a frame, in particular OX(−1) has a nowhere-vanishing frame on each chart (Two-affine projective line and its twists); the polynomial rings k[t], k[u] are principal ideal domains (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain); a finitely generated torsion-free module over a principal ideal domain is free (Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free).

[F6]

At each point x, the stalk sequence of a short exact sequence of finite locally free modules is exact. Once F is known to be locally free, the surjection Ex→Fx splits because Fx is a free module over the local ring OX,x and a basis can be lifted; hence the stalk ranks add (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Locally free sheaves of finite rank, The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).

[F7]

For every quasi-coherent F and every affine open U=Spec⁡A of X, the canonical comparison F∣U≅Γ(U,F)~ is an isomorphism, compatibly with restrictions to smaller affine opens; on an associated sheaf M~ one has M~(D(f))=Mf with restriction the localisation map; the basic opens D(f) form a basis of the topology of Spec⁡A; and an element of Mf is zero exactly when some power of f kills a numerator (Checking quasi-coherence on an affine cover, Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens, The underlying space of an affine spectrum, A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).

[F8]

Affine schemes are quasi-compact, so every open cover of Spec⁡A has a finite subcover (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes).

[F9]

If z∈F(U) and a∈OX(U) satisfy a⋅z=0 and W⊆U is an open set on which a is a unit of OX(W), then z∣W=0; on the nonvanishing locus of a the section a is invertible; and sections of a sheaf of modules over U and over W that agree on U∩W glue to a unique section over U∪W (A sheaf on a topological space, Modules on a ringed space, A locally ringed space, A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme).

[F10]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the twisting supplier [F2], the cohomology suppliers [F1], [F3], the coherence supplier [F4], the affine correspondence [F7], and the curve supplier [F11] (The Axiom of Choice).

[F11]

X=Pk1 is an integral finite-type curve. For every nonempty open V⊆X, restriction embeds Γ(V,OX) into the function field k(t); thus a nonzero regular section remains nonzero on every nonempty open and has nonzero germ at every point there. The residue-zero locus of a nonzero regular function on a nonempty affine open U⊆X is a proper closed subset, hence is finite, and each of its points is closed in X (Two-affine projective line and its twists, Integral schemes, Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite).

Proof

technique · direct; compute the cohomology of the quotient twisted by $\mathcal O_X(-b-1)$ to force torsion-freeness, then read local freeness off the two affine charts
1.1F1F2

The twisted extension. By [F1] the morphism φ is injective, so 0→OX(b)→E→F→0 is exact with F=E/OX(b). Twisting by OX(−b) and using OX(b)⊗OX(−b)≅OX gives the exact sequence 0→OX→M→F(−b)→0 with M:=E(−b); by [F1] H0(X,M)≠0, while H0(X,M(−1))=H0(X,E(−b−1))=0 because M(−1)≅E(−b−1).

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

The quotient has no sections in the next twist. Twisting the sequence of step 1.1 by OX(−1) gives the exact sequence 0→OX(−1)→M(−1)→F(−b−1)→0. Its long exact sequence [F3] reads 0=H0(X,M(−1))→H0(X,F(−b−1))→H1(X,OX(−1))=0, because H0(X,OX(−1))=0 as well; hence H0(X,F(−b−1))=0.

3.1F2F5F7F9F11step 2.1

F(−b) is torsion-free. Suppose there are an open U0⊆X, nonzero m∈F(−b)(U0) and nonzero a∈OX(U0) with a m=0. Choose a point x∈U0 with mx≠0; this only uses that m is a nonzero section, and the nonzero-germ locus is not asserted to be open. Choose one of the two standard charts T containing x, then a principal affine open U⊆U0∩T containing x. The restricted sections remain nonzero, and OX(−1)∣U has a nowhere-vanishing frame g by [F5, F11]. The assignment s↦s⊗g is an isomorphism F(−b)∣U→F(−b−1)∣U, so m′:=m∣U⊗g∈F(−b−1)(U) is nonzero and a∣U m′=0. Let Z={y∈U:ay∈my}=V(a∣U), the residue-zero locus. It is a proper closed subset of the integral curve U because a∣U is nonzero [F11]; by [F11] it is finite and each point of Z is closed in X. Thus W:=X∖Z is open and U∪W=X. On U∩W=U∖Z, the residue of a is nonzero at each point, so a is a unit in every stalk and m′∣U∩W=0 by [F9]. The sections m′ over U and 0 over W agree on the overlap and glue to a nonzero global section of F(−b−1), contradicting step 2.1. Hence F(−b) is torsion-free.

4.1F2F4F5F7F8step 3.1

Local freeness. Fix a standard chart U=Spec⁡A, A=k[t] or k[u], and put M:=F(−b)(U). By [F4], F(−b) is coherent, hence quasi-coherent, so [F7] applies and F(−b)∣U≅M~, so F(−b)(D(f))≅Mf for every f∈A. By [F4] F(−b) is coherent, hence of finite type, so every point x∈U has an affine open Vx⊆X with F(−b)∣Vx≅Nx~ for a finitely generated module Nx; choosing fx∈A with x∈D(fx)⊆Vx∩U [F7], putting Bx:=Γ(Vx,OX), the affine restriction isomorphism in [F7] identifies Mfx with Afx⊗BxNx, a finitely generated Afx-module whose generators are the images of any finite generating set of Nx. Since U is affine, hence quasi-compact [F8], finitely many such D(f1),…,D(fk) cover U, so f1,…,fk generate the unit ideal of A and each Mfi is finitely generated. Choose finitely many elements of M whose images generate each Mfi and let N⊆M be the submodule they generate. For every z∈M/N, the vanishing (M/N)fi=0 and [F7] give, for each i, a power fini(z) that annihilates this element z; the powers may depend on z. Since (f1,…,fk)=A, also (f1n1(z),…,fknk(z))=A (their generated ideal has the same radical as the unit ideal). Thus z=0, and M/N=0: M is a finitely generated A-module. By step 3.1 the module M is torsion-free, and A=k[t] (respectively k[u]) is a principal ideal domain [F5], so M is free [F5]. As the two charts cover X, F(−b) is finite locally free; twisting back by OX(b), an equivalence by [F2], F is finite locally free as well.

5.1F6step 1.1step 4.1

The rank. At each point x∈X, the stalk sequence from step 1.1 is exact and all three stalks are free after step 4.1. The surjection Ex→Fx splits because Fx is free, so the ranks add: r=1+rk⁡Fx. Hence F is locally free of rank r−1 everywhere.

6.1F10step 4.1step 5.1∎

Conclusion. The module F is finite locally free of rank r−1 by steps 4.1 and 5.1. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F10].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

153 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources