Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme

Statement

Let X be a scheme, let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves), let s∈Γ(X,L) be a global section, and let U⊆X be an affine open subscheme (Affine open subschemes). With Xs={ x∈X:the image of s in L⊗OXκ(x) is nonzero }, the intersection U∩Xs is an affine open subscheme of X. The statement includes a nowhere-vanishing section, for which U∩Xs=U, and the zero section, for which U∩Xs=∅.

Moreover, if M is a second invertible OX-module and t∈Γ(X,M), then Xs∩Xt=Xs⊗t inside X, where s⊗t∈Γ(X,L⊗M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A scheme X, an invertible sheaf L on X, a section s∈Γ(X,L), and an affine open U⊆X; in the second part also an invertible sheaf M and a section t∈Γ(X,M).

[F1]

An invertible OX-module is a locally free sheaf of rank exactly one; over an affine scheme Spec⁡R it corresponds to an R-module N whose localisation Np at every prime is free of rank one over Rp. (Invertible sheaves)

[F2]

An affine open subscheme of X is an open subscheme which, with its restricted structure sheaf, is an affine scheme Spec⁡R; the empty scheme is affine, being the spectrum of the zero ring. (Affine open subschemes, The underlying space of an affine spectrum)

[F3]

(algebra) For an R-module N, the tensor algebra TR(N)=⨁n≥0N⊗Rn has TR(N)⊗RR′≅TR′(N⊗RR′) for every ring map R→R′, because tensor products commute with direct sums; and for any ideal J⊆TR(N) with image J′⊆TR′(N⊗RR′), the base change of the quotient is the quotient by the image, (TR(N)/J)⊗RR′≅TR′(N⊗RR′)/J′, because −⊗RR′ is right exact. These identifications are compatible with a further base change R′→R′′.

[F4]

(algebra) Let R be a local ring with maximal ideal m, let N be a free R-module of rank one, and let s∈N with s∉mN. Then s generates N: the class of s generates the one-dimensional vector space N/mN, so Nakayama's lemma applies to the finitely generated module N/⟨s⟩, whose localisation N/⟨s⟩⊗Rκ vanishes; and a free module of rank one generated by one element is free on that element.

[F5]

(algebra) Let R→R′ be a ring map and let N′ be an R′-module. If the images of an element s∈N′ generate Np′ for every prime p⊆R′, then s generates N′, because the quotient N′/⟨s⟩ has all localisations at primes zero.

[F6]

(schemes) A morphism f:Y→Z of schemes is an isomorphism if and only if there is an open cover Z=⋃iZi with f−1(Zi)→Zi an isomorphism for every i; consequently a morphism whose image lies in an open subscheme V⊆Z factors through V, and if it becomes an isomorphism over an open cover of V, then Y→V is an isomorphism.

Proof

technique · direct: reduce to the affine algebra problem $R$, $N$, $s\in N$, build the quotient $B$ of the tensor algebra by $s-1$, and identify $\operatorname{Spec}B$ with the locus where $s$ generates $N$ chartwise
1.1F1F2given

Reduction. Write U=Spec⁡R by [F2] and put N=Γ(U,L∣U). By [F1] the R-module N is locally free of rank one, so Np≅Rp for every prime p; as the fibre of L at the point p is N⊗Rκ(p), the point lies in U∩Xs exactly when the image of s in N⊗Rκ(p) is nonzero. Hence it suffices to prove that for a commutative ring R, a locally free rank-one R-module N and an element s∈N, the set V={p∈Spec⁡R:s∉pNp} is an affine open subscheme of Spec⁡R.

1.2F3algebra

The algebra B. Let T=TR(N)=⨁n≥0N⊗Rn be the tensor algebra, and let J⊆T be the two-sided ideal generated by all elements m⊗n−n⊗m with m,n∈N and by the element s−1∈T, where s∈N=T1. Put B=T/J. Then B is a commutative R-algebra, because the degree-one generators of T commute modulo J and every element of T is a sum of products of degree-one elements; it is generated as an R-algebra by the image of N. The relation s=1 need not preserve the tensor grading, and no grading on B is used.

1.3F1algebra

The tensor identity. Let M be a second invertible sheaf and let t∈Γ(X,M); then L⊗M is invertible, and at every point x the fibre of L⊗M is (L⊗κ(x))⊗κ(x)(M⊗κ(x)), a tensor product of one-dimensional vector spaces, in which the image of s⊗t is the product of the images of s and of t. Hence the image of s⊗t is nonzero exactly when both are, so Xs⊗t=Xs∩Xt.

2.1F3step 1.2

Base change of B. For every ring map R→R′ the identifications of [F3] give a canonical isomorphism B⊗RR′≅TR′(N⊗RR′) modulo the ideal generated by the images of the generators of J, namely by the commutators and by the image of s−1; these identifications are compatible with a further base change. In the special case that N=R′ is free on the basis element s one has TR′(N)=R′[s] and B⊗RR′=R′[s]/(s−1)≅R′.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Empty fibre where s vanishes. Let p⊆R be a prime with s∈pNp, and put κ=κ(p), N′=N⊗Rκ. Then N′ is one-dimensional over κ by [F1], the image s′ of s in N′ is zero, and step 2.1 gives B⊗Rκ=κ[u]/(0−1)=0, the quotient of the polynomial algebra κ[u] by the unit relation s′−1=−1. Hence the fibre Spec⁡(B⊗Rκ(p)) of Spec⁡B→Spec⁡R over p is empty.

3.2F4step 2.1

Nonempty fibre where s generates. Let p⊆R be a prime with s∉pNp. Since Np is free of rank one over the local ring Rp, [F4] shows that s is a basis of Np; localising the isomorphism of step 2.1 at p gives Bp≅Rp[s]/(s−1)≅Rp, so Bp≠0 and B⊗Rκ(p)≅κ(p)≠0.

4.1F6step 3.1step 3.2

The morphism factors through V. By steps 3.1 and 3.2 the fibre of Spec⁡B→Spec⁡R is empty exactly over the primes outside V; in particular the set-theoretic image is contained in V, so by [F6] the affine morphism factors as a morphism Spec⁡B→V⊆Spec⁡R into the open subscheme V.

5.1F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1

It is an isomorphism onto V. Let Spec⁡R′⊆V be an affine open, and let N′=N⊗RR′. For every prime p⊆R′ the image of s in Np generates, so s generates N′ by [F5]; since N′ is locally free of rank one, N′ is free on the basis element s. Step 2.1 then gives B⊗RR′≅R′[s]/(s−1)≅R′, that is, the base change of the morphism Spec⁡B→V of step 4.1 over the affine open Spec⁡R′ is an isomorphism. The affine opens Spec⁡R′⊆V cover V, so by the local criterion of [F6] the morphism Spec⁡B→V is an isomorphism; in particular V is affine, with coordinate ring B, and step 1.1 identifies U∩Xs with V.

6.1

Boundaries. If s is nowhere vanishing then Xs=X and U∩Xs=U is affine by hypothesis. If s=0 then s∈pNp for every prime, so V=∅ by step 3.1, which is affine because it is the spectrum of the zero ring by [F2], while step 1.3 gives X0∩Xt=∅=X0⊗t. Together with steps 1.1-5.1 this proves both claims of the Statement. [F2, step 1.1, step 1.3, step 5.1] \qed

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources