Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the sheaf and Proj suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian scheme (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves). Then L is ample (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) if and only if for every coherent OX-module F (Coherent module sheaves) the twist F⊗OXL⊗n is globally generated (Global generation by the evaluation map) for all sufficiently large integers n; the bound may depend on F. On the locally Noetherian scheme X the coherent sheaves are exactly the quasi-coherent sheaves of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves), so the condition may equivalently be tested on quasi-coherent sheaves of finite type. The empty scheme and the zero sheaf are allowed: if X=∅ then L is ample by the vacuous definition and the zero sheaf, the only coherent sheaf, is globally generated.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian scheme X, an invertible OX-module L, and the Axiom of Choice as inherited.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

An invertible L is ample when X is quasi-compact and for every x∈X there are n≥1 and s∈Γ(X,Ln) with x∈Xs and Xs affine, where Xs is the nonvanishing locus of s; the empty scheme is allowed. (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)

[F2]

F is globally generated when its evaluation map Γ(X,F)⊗ZOX→F is surjective, equivalently when for every x∈X the images of the global sections generate the stalk Fx as an OX,x-module; for an invertible sheaf M this holds as soon as at each point some global section has nonzero value there. (Global generation by the evaluation map)

[F3]

An invertible OX-module M is locally free of rank exactly one: Mx≅OX,x for every x∈X, and the fibre κ(x)⊗OX,xMx is a one-dimensional κ(x)-vector space, so the value s(x) of a germ sx is nonzero exactly when sx is a unit, i.e. sx∉mxMx. (Invertible sheaves)

[F4]

Let X be quasi-compact and quasi-separated, F quasi-coherent, L invertible and s∈Γ(X,Ld) with d>0. Then every section of F over Xs extends after multiplying by a power of s: there are r≥0 and a∈Γ(X,F⊗Ldr) whose image under the canonical map to Γ(Xs,F) is the given section. (Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power)

[F5]

A scheme is locally Noetherian if it has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and Noetherian if it is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact; equivalently, a Noetherian scheme has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings. (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes)

[F6]

On a locally Noetherian scheme, coherent sheaves are exactly the finite-type quasi-coherent sheaves, and kernels, cokernels and extensions of coherent sheaves are coherent. (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme)

[F7]

An OX-module is quasi-coherent if and only if its restriction to every member of one affine open cover is associated to a module; then it is associated on every affine open, with canonical restriction compatibility. (Checking quasi-coherence on an affine cover)

[F8]

For a commutative ring R, a multiplicative subset S and an ideal I one has S−1I=S−1I as ideals of S−1R. (Radicals commute with localization)

[F9]

Every Zariski-closed subset Z of a spectrum has a unique radical defining ideal I(Z)=⋂p∈Zp, and f vanishes at every point of Z exactly when f∈I(Z); for the empty family the intersection is the whole ring. (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal)

[F10]

If U⊆X is affine open and s is a global section of an invertible sheaf, then U∩Xs is an affine open subscheme. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme)

[F11]

L is ample if and only if its m-th tensor power Lm is ample, for every m≥1. (Ampleness is invariant under positive powers)

[F12]

The spectrum of a Noetherian commutative ring is a Noetherian topological space, so every descending chain of closed subsets stabilizes. (The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space)

[F13]

Assume AC [A1]. Every open subset U of a Noetherian topological space X is compact. If an open cover (Pa)a∈A of U had no finite subcover, recursively choose xn∈U∖(Pa1∪⋯∪Pan) and a member Pan+1 containing xn. Since U is open in X, every Pa is open in X, and the finite unions Pa1∪⋯∪Pan form a strictly ascending chain of open subsets, contradicting Noetherianity.

[F14]

A quasi-coherent sheaf is of finite type exactly when X can be covered by affine opens U=Spec⁡A over which it is generated by finitely many sections, i.e. admits an epimorphism OU r→F∣U. (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves)

[F15]

A scheme X is quasi-compact when ∣X∣ is quasi-compact, and quasi-separated when the intersection of every two affine open subschemes is quasi-compact. (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes)

[F16]

Distinguished-open data of an A-module extend uniquely to an associated sheaf whose sections on D(f) are the localizations Mf; in particular two OSpec⁡A-modules whose sections and restrictions agree on all distinguished opens coincide. (The associated module sheaf exists)

[F17]

An ideal sheaf on a scheme is a subsheaf I⊆OX whose sections over every open form an ideal, compatibly with restriction. (Ideal sheaves)

Proof

technique · direct: show that ampleness gives global generation of all large twists of any finite-type module by extending finitely many generators over an affine nonvanishing cover, and conversely construct the ideal sheaf of the complement of an affine open, apply global generation to it, and read off an affine nonvanishing locus through every point
1.1F1F5

Assume first that L is ample. By [F1] every point x has an nx≥1 and sx∈Γ(X,Lnx) with x∈Xsx and Xsx affine; since X is quasi-compact by [F5], finitely many points x1,…,xk have X=⋃iXsi, where si=sxi and Xsi is affine.

1.2A1F5F12F13F15algebra

The underlying space of X is Noetherian: by [F5] choose a finite affine open cover X=U1∪⋯∪Ur with Ui=Spec⁡Ai and Ai Noetherian; each Ui is a Noetherian topological space by [F12], and a descending chain of closed subsets of X has traces in the finitely many Ui which stabilize by some index, whence the chain itself stabilizes because a closed subset of X is determined by its traces on a finite open cover. Consequently X is quasi-compact, and every open subset of X is compact by [F13], so in particular the intersection of two affine opens is quasi-compact and X is quasi-separated in the sense of [F15].

1.3F2F3algebra

For an invertible OX-module M, the sheaf M is globally generated if and only if for every x∈X some global section s∈Γ(X,M) has s(x)≠0: by [F2] global generation means that the images of the global sections generate Mx, and by [F3] Mx is free of rank one over OX,x, so a family generates Mx exactly when one member is a unit; a germ in Mx≅OX,x is a unit exactly when its value in the fibre is nonzero.

1.4F17algebra

Conversely, assume that for every coherent sheaf there is a bound beyond which all its twists by L are globally generated. Let x∈X and let U be an affine open subscheme containing x; put Z=X∖U, a closed subset of X. Define I⊆OX by Γ(W,I)={f∈Γ(W,OX):fz∈mzOX,z for every z∈Z∩W}; this is an ideal sheaf [F17], its sections vanish at every point of Z, and its restriction to U is the unit ideal: for an affine chart V⊆U one has Z∩V=∅ and the defining condition is vacuous, so Γ(V,I)=Γ(V,OX).

1.5F5F6F7F8F9F16algebra

Choose the finite affine open cover X=U1∪⋯∪Ur with Ui=Spec⁡Ai and Ai Noetherian from [F5]. For each i the ideal Γ(Ui,I)={f∈Ai:f∈p for every p∈Z∩Ui} is, by [F9], the radical defining ideal of the closed subset Z∩Ui (with value Ai when Z∩Ui=∅), hence is finitely generated because Ai is Noetherian. For D(f)⊆Ui, both Γ(D(f),I) and (Γ(Ui,I))f are the radical defining ideal of Z∩D(f) in Af: the first by definition, the second by [F8]. Thus I∣Ui is the sheaf associated to the module Γ(Ui,I) by [F16], so I is quasi-coherent by the affine-cover criterion [F7] and of finite type because a finite generating set of each Γ(Ui,I) generates I on Ui; since X is locally Noetherian, [F6] makes I coherent.

2.1step 1.1step 1.3algebra

With d=d1⋯dk, where di=deg⁡si, each power sid/di∈Γ(X,Ld) has Xsid/di=Xsi; these loci cover X, so step 1.3 applies and Ld is globally generated.

2.2F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Let M be an ample invertible sheaf on X and let G be a quasi-coherent OX-module. For m≥1 let Gm⊆G be the image of the canonical map Γ(X,G⊗Mm)⊗ZM−m→G. Then G=∑m≥1Gm. Indeed, applying step 1.1 to M gives finitely many tj∈Γ(X,Mej), ej≥1, with X=⋃jXtj and each Xtj affine. For a section u∈Γ(Xtj,G) the extension lemma [F4] applied on the quasi-compact quasi-separated scheme X of step 1.2 to s=tj yields r≥0 and a∈Γ(X,G⊗Mejr) whose image after division by tjr is u. If r≥1, this places u in Gejr∣Xtj. If r=0, multiply a by tj to obtain a global section of G⊗Mej whose image after division by tj is still u, placing u in Gej∣Xtj. Thus every local section of G lies locally in ∑m≥1Gm, and a subsheaf whose sections surject onto those of G over a cover equals G.

2.3F3F9F10step 1.4step 1.5algebra

Let n≥max⁡(n0(I),1) be such that I⊗Ln is globally generated. By step 1.4 the stalk Ix is OX,x, so (I⊗Ln)x≅(Ln)x is free of rank one [F3]; global generation produces a global section t whose germ at x is not in mx(I⊗Ln)x, and viewing t as a section s∈Γ(X,Ln) through this identification, s(x)≠0. For z∈Z the stalk of I at z is contained in mz by the description in step 1.5 and [F9], so s vanishes at every point of Z and therefore Xs⊆X∖Z=U. As U is affine, Xs=U∩Xs is affine by [F10].

3.1F3F11step 2.2algebra

For every j≥0 and every x∈X there are m≥1 and a∈Γ(X,Lj+dm) with a(x)≠0. Indeed, Ld is ample by [F11], so step 2.2 applied to M=Ld and G=Lj gives Lj=∑mGm; the stalk (Lj)x is free of rank one by [F3], so if every global section of every Lj+dm vanished at x, then every summand Gm would vanish at x — its value at x is spanned by products of values g(x)a(x) — contradicting that the sum equals Lj.

3.2F5F14step 2.2algebra

Let F be quasi-coherent of finite type, and define Fm as in step 2.2 for M=L; put JN=∑m≤NFm. Then F=∑mFm=⋃NJN, and there is N with F=JN. To see this, use [F14] and quasi-compactness of X to choose a finite cover of X by opens Vi on which F is generated by finitely many sections gil∈F(Vi); since (JN)x is increasing in N with union Fx, each germ (gil)x lies in some (JNil(x))x, and because only finitely many pairs occur at x, a single N(x) works. A germ (gil)x∈(JN(x))x means that gil lies in JN(x) over some open neighbourhood of x; over such a neighbourhood contained in all relevant Vi the sections gil lie in JN(x) and generate F, so JN(x)=F over it. These neighbourhoods cover the quasi-compact space X, so finitely many suffice and N is their maximum.

4.1F5step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Fix j≥0. By step 3.1 the loci Xa, for a∈Γ(X,Lj+dm), m≥1, cover X; quasi-compactness of X [F5] gives finitely many a1,…,ar with degrees j+dm1,…,j+dmr such that X=⋃lXal. Put nj=max⁡lml. Then Lj+dnj is globally generated: at any point x choose l with al(x)≠0 and, by step 2.1 and step 1.3, a section u∈Γ(X,Ld) with u(x)≠0; then al⊗unj−ml∈Γ(X,Lj+dnj) has nonzero value at x, so step 1.3 applies.

5.1step 1.3step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Put n0(L)=d⋅max⁡0≤j<dnj+(d−1). For every n≥n0(L) the sheaf Ln is globally generated: write n=j+dn′ with 0≤j<d; then n′≥max⁡ini≥nj and Ln=Lj+dnj⊗(Ld)n′−nj is a tensor product of two globally generated invertible sheaves, which is globally generated because the tensor product of sections nonzero at a point is nonzero at that point, so step 1.3 applies.

6.1F2step 5.1step 3.2algebra

For m≥N+n0(L) the sheaf F⊗Lm is globally generated: by step 3.2 and right exactness of tensoring with the invertible sheaf Lm, one has F⊗Lm=∑m′≤N(Fm′⊗Lm); each summand is isomorphic to (Fm′⊗Lm′)⊗Lm−m′, where Fm′⊗Lm′ is globally generated by construction of Fm′ as the image of an evaluation map, and Lm−m′ is globally generated by step 5.1 because m−m′≥n0(L). A tensor product of globally generated sheaves is globally generated, and a finite sum of globally generated subsheaves is globally generated because the evaluation map of the ambient sheaf maps onto each summand.

7.1F6step 5.1step 6.1

If L is ample, then every coherent F is quasi-coherent of finite type by [F6], so steps 5.1 and 6.1 provide a bound, depending on F, beyond which all twists F⊗Ln are globally generated. This proves the forward implication.

8.1

Steps 1.4, 1.5 and 2.3 show that the global-generation hypothesis provides, for every x∈X, an n≥1 and s∈Γ(X,Ln) with x∈Xs and Xs affine; since X is quasi-compact by [F5], the definition [F1] makes L ample. Together with step 7.1 this proves both implications. If X=∅, then L is ample by [F1] vacuously, and the zero sheaf is globally generated, so the empty case contributes no exception. The recursive open-cover selection in [F13] uses [A1]; the other uses of choice are inherited from the cited sheaf, Proj and closed-subset interfaces, and the proof selects nothing beyond the choices recorded there. [A1, F1, F5, F13, step 1.4, step 1.5, step 2.3, step 7.1, cases: empty] \qed

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources