How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the sheaf and Proj suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian scheme (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and let be an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves). Then is ample (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) if and only if for every coherent -module (Coherent module sheaves) the twist is globally generated (Global generation by the evaluation map) for all sufficiently large integers ; the bound may depend on . On the locally Noetherian scheme the coherent sheaves are exactly the quasi-coherent sheaves of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves), so the condition may equivalently be tested on quasi-coherent sheaves of finite type. The empty scheme and the zero sheaf are allowed: if then is ample by the vacuous definition and the zero sheaf, the only coherent sheaf, is globally generated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian scheme , an invertible -module , and the Axiom of Choice as inherited.
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
An invertible is ample when is quasi-compact and for every there are and with and affine, where is the nonvanishing locus of ; the empty scheme is allowed. (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)
is globally generated when its evaluation map is surjective, equivalently when for every the images of the global sections generate the stalk as an -module; for an invertible sheaf this holds as soon as at each point some global section has nonzero value there. (Global generation by the evaluation map)
An invertible -module is locally free of rank exactly one: for every , and the fibre is a one-dimensional -vector space, so the value of a germ is nonzero exactly when is a unit, i.e. . (Invertible sheaves)
Let be quasi-compact and quasi-separated, quasi-coherent, invertible and with . Then every section of over extends after multiplying by a power of : there are and whose image under the canonical map to is the given section. (Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power)
A scheme is locally Noetherian if it has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and Noetherian if it is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact; equivalently, a Noetherian scheme has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings. (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes)
On a locally Noetherian scheme, coherent sheaves are exactly the finite-type quasi-coherent sheaves, and kernels, cokernels and extensions of coherent sheaves are coherent. (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme)
An -module is quasi-coherent if and only if its restriction to every member of one affine open cover is associated to a module; then it is associated on every affine open, with canonical restriction compatibility. (Checking quasi-coherence on an affine cover)
For a commutative ring , a multiplicative subset and an ideal one has as ideals of . (Radicals commute with localization)
Every Zariski-closed subset of a spectrum has a unique radical defining ideal , and vanishes at every point of exactly when ; for the empty family the intersection is the whole ring. (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal)
If is affine open and is a global section of an invertible sheaf, then is an affine open subscheme. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme)
is ample if and only if its -th tensor power is ample, for every . (Ampleness is invariant under positive powers)
The spectrum of a Noetherian commutative ring is a Noetherian topological space, so every descending chain of closed subsets stabilizes. (The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space)
Assume AC [A1]. Every open subset of a Noetherian topological space is compact. If an open cover of had no finite subcover, recursively choose and a member containing . Since is open in , every is open in , and the finite unions form a strictly ascending chain of open subsets, contradicting Noetherianity.
A quasi-coherent sheaf is of finite type exactly when can be covered by affine opens over which it is generated by finitely many sections, i.e. admits an epimorphism . (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves)
A scheme is quasi-compact when is quasi-compact, and quasi-separated when the intersection of every two affine open subschemes is quasi-compact. (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes)
Distinguished-open data of an -module extend uniquely to an associated sheaf whose sections on are the localizations ; in particular two -modules whose sections and restrictions agree on all distinguished opens coincide. (The associated module sheaf exists)
An ideal sheaf on a scheme is a subsheaf whose sections over every open form an ideal, compatibly with restriction. (Ideal sheaves)
Proof
Assume first that is ample. By [F1] every point has an and with and affine; since is quasi-compact by [F5], finitely many points have , where and is affine.
The underlying space of is Noetherian: by [F5] choose a finite affine open cover with and Noetherian; each is a Noetherian topological space by [F12], and a descending chain of closed subsets of has traces in the finitely many which stabilize by some index, whence the chain itself stabilizes because a closed subset of is determined by its traces on a finite open cover. Consequently is quasi-compact, and every open subset of is compact by [F13], so in particular the intersection of two affine opens is quasi-compact and is quasi-separated in the sense of [F15].
For an invertible -module , the sheaf is globally generated if and only if for every some global section has : by [F2] global generation means that the images of the global sections generate , and by [F3] is free of rank one over , so a family generates exactly when one member is a unit; a germ in is a unit exactly when its value in the fibre is nonzero.
Conversely, assume that for every coherent sheaf there is a bound beyond which all its twists by are globally generated. Let and let be an affine open subscheme containing ; put , a closed subset of . Define by ; this is an ideal sheaf [F17], its sections vanish at every point of , and its restriction to is the unit ideal: for an affine chart one has and the defining condition is vacuous, so .
Choose the finite affine open cover with and Noetherian from [F5]. For each the ideal is, by [F9], the radical defining ideal of the closed subset (with value when ), hence is finitely generated because is Noetherian. For , both and are the radical defining ideal of in : the first by definition, the second by [F8]. Thus is the sheaf associated to the module by [F16], so is quasi-coherent by the affine-cover criterion [F7] and of finite type because a finite generating set of each generates on ; since is locally Noetherian, [F6] makes coherent.
With , where , each power has ; these loci cover , so step 1.3 applies and is globally generated.
Let be an ample invertible sheaf on and let be a quasi-coherent -module. For let be the image of the canonical map . Then . Indeed, applying step 1.1 to gives finitely many , , with and each affine. For a section the extension lemma [F4] applied on the quasi-compact quasi-separated scheme of step 1.2 to yields and whose image after division by is . If , this places in . If , multiply by to obtain a global section of whose image after division by is still , placing in . Thus every local section of lies locally in , and a subsheaf whose sections surject onto those of over a cover equals .
Let be such that is globally generated. By step 1.4 the stalk is , so is free of rank one [F3]; global generation produces a global section whose germ at is not in , and viewing as a section through this identification, . For the stalk of at is contained in by the description in step 1.5 and [F9], so vanishes at every point of and therefore . As is affine, is affine by [F10].
For every and every there are and with . Indeed, is ample by [F11], so step 2.2 applied to and gives ; the stalk is free of rank one by [F3], so if every global section of every vanished at , then every summand would vanish at — its value at is spanned by products of values — contradicting that the sum equals .
Let be quasi-coherent of finite type, and define as in step 2.2 for ; put . Then , and there is with . To see this, use [F14] and quasi-compactness of to choose a finite cover of by opens on which is generated by finitely many sections ; since is increasing in with union , each germ lies in some , and because only finitely many pairs occur at , a single works. A germ means that lies in over some open neighbourhood of ; over such a neighbourhood contained in all relevant the sections lie in and generate , so over it. These neighbourhoods cover the quasi-compact space , so finitely many suffice and is their maximum.
Fix . By step 3.1 the loci , for , , cover ; quasi-compactness of [F5] gives finitely many with degrees such that . Put . Then is globally generated: at any point choose with and, by step 2.1 and step 1.3, a section with ; then has nonzero value at , so step 1.3 applies.
Put . For every the sheaf is globally generated: write with ; then and is a tensor product of two globally generated invertible sheaves, which is globally generated because the tensor product of sections nonzero at a point is nonzero at that point, so step 1.3 applies.
For the sheaf is globally generated: by step 3.2 and right exactness of tensoring with the invertible sheaf , one has ; each summand is isomorphic to , where is globally generated by construction of as the image of an evaluation map, and is globally generated by step 5.1 because . A tensor product of globally generated sheaves is globally generated, and a finite sum of globally generated subsheaves is globally generated because the evaluation map of the ambient sheaf maps onto each summand.
If is ample, then every coherent is quasi-coherent of finite type by [F6], so steps 5.1 and 6.1 provide a bound, depending on , beyond which all twists are globally generated. This proves the forward implication.
Steps 1.4, 1.5 and 2.3 show that the global-generation hypothesis provides, for every , an and with and affine; since is quasi-compact by [F5], the definition [F1] makes ample. Together with step 7.1 this proves both implications. If , then is ample by [F1] vacuously, and the zero sheaf is globally generated, so the empty case contributes no exception. The recursive open-cover selection in [F13] uses [A1]; the other uses of choice are inherited from the cited sheaf, Proj and closed-subset interfaces, and the proof selects nothing beyond the choices recorded there. [A1, F1, F5, F13, step 1.4, step 1.5, step 2.3, step 7.1, cases: empty] \qed
Depends on
- Absolute ampleness by affine section opens
- Global generation by the evaluation map
- Invertible sheaves
- Ideal sheaves
- Affine open subschemes
- Coherent module sheaves
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves
- The Axiom of Choice
- Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power
- A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme
- Ampleness is invariant under positive powers
- Radicals commute with localization
- Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal
- Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme
- Checking quasi-coherence on an affine cover
- The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space
- The associated module sheaf exists
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Properties of Schemes, Proposition 28.27.13 (Tag 01Q3) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Modules, Lemma 17.9.7 (Tag 01BB) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, August 2022 draft, Sections 17.4, 17.6 (standard reference, not scraped)