Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global generation by the evaluation map

Definition

Let X be a scheme and let F be an OX-module, for instance a quasi-coherent sheaf (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). The evaluation map of F is the morphism of OX-modules ev⁡F:Γ(X,F)⊗ZOX⟶F,f⊗g⟼g⋅f∣U  on U⊆X, where the tensor product is taken over Z because the global sections Γ(X,F) are only an abelian group in general and the sheaf OX carries the OX-module structure. Concretely, on an open U the map sends a finite sum ∑ifi⊗gi with fi∈Γ(X,F), gi∈Γ(U,OX) to ∑igi⋅fi∣U. The sheaf F is globally generated when ev⁡F is surjective. Equivalently, for every point x∈X the images of the global sections generate the stalk Fx as an OX,x-module: passing to stalks, (ev⁡F)x is the map Γ(X,F)⊗ZOX,x→Fx, and a morphism of sheaves is surjective exactly when it is surjective on every stalk. For an invertible sheaf L the condition takes the following form (Invertible sheaves): if there are finitely many global sections s0,…,sn∈Γ(X,L) such that the induced morphism OX n+1⟶L,(g0,…,gn)⟼∑igisi, is surjective, then L is globally generated, since this morphism factors the evaluation map. The converse holds when X is quasi-compact: see the Remarks.

Remarks

  • Finiteness on a quasi-compact scheme. Let L be invertible on a quasi-compact scheme X and suppose L is globally generated. Then there exist finitely many global sections s0,…,sn of L with OXn+1→L surjective. For each global section t, let Xt be the locus where its germ generates L. In a local frame, t has coefficient f, and this locus is where fx is a unit. A germ inverse extends to a neighbourhood and its product with f equals 1 after shrinking, so Xt is open. These opens, indexed by all global sections, cover X: if every section had coefficient in the maximal ideal at some x, their germs could not generate the free rank-one stalk Lx. Quasi-compactness gives a finite subcover Xs0,…,Xsn, and the corresponding sections generate at every stalk. This proves the asserted surjectivity. If X is empty, take the single zero section. The argument uses the local freeness of L, not a general openness assertion for surjectivity loci.
  • Terminology. The phrase generated by global sections is used interchangeably with globally generated.
  • Relation to ampleness. Ampleness, defined at Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, is not the same condition as global generation, in either direction. The interaction is a theorem, not a convention: under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), on a Noetherian scheme an invertible sheaf is ample exactly when every coherent sheaf twisted by a sufficiently high power is globally generated, so in particular high powers of an ample invertible sheaf are globally generated; the precise statement is Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources