How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global generation by the evaluation map
Definition
Let be a scheme and let be an -module, for instance a quasi-coherent sheaf (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). The evaluation map of is the morphism of -modules where the tensor product is taken over because the global sections are only an abelian group in general and the sheaf carries the -module structure. Concretely, on an open the map sends a finite sum with , to . The sheaf is globally generated when is surjective. Equivalently, for every point the images of the global sections generate the stalk as an -module: passing to stalks, is the map , and a morphism of sheaves is surjective exactly when it is surjective on every stalk. For an invertible sheaf the condition takes the following form (Invertible sheaves): if there are finitely many global sections such that the induced morphism is surjective, then is globally generated, since this morphism factors the evaluation map. The converse holds when is quasi-compact: see the Remarks.
Remarks
- Finiteness on a quasi-compact scheme. Let be invertible on a quasi-compact scheme and suppose is globally generated. Then there exist finitely many global sections of with surjective. For each global section , let be the locus where its germ generates . In a local frame, has coefficient , and this locus is where is a unit. A germ inverse extends to a neighbourhood and its product with equals after shrinking, so is open. These opens, indexed by all global sections, cover : if every section had coefficient in the maximal ideal at some , their germs could not generate the free rank-one stalk . Quasi-compactness gives a finite subcover , and the corresponding sections generate at every stalk. This proves the asserted surjectivity. If is empty, take the single zero section. The argument uses the local freeness of , not a general openness assertion for surjectivity loci.
- Terminology. The phrase generated by global sections is used interchangeably with globally generated.
- Relation to ampleness. Ampleness, defined at Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, is not the same condition as global generation, in either direction. The interaction is a theorem, not a convention: under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), on a Noetherian scheme an invertible sheaf is ample exactly when every coherent sheaf twisted by a sufficiently high power is globally generated, so in particular high powers of an ample invertible sheaf are globally generated; the precise statement is Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness.
Depends on
Used by
- Global generation does not imply very ampleness Counterexample
- O(-1) has no global generator Counterexample
- The conic map from O(2) Example
- Eventual generation of coherent projective twists Lemma
- High-degree section module is finite graded Lemma
- Projective coherent finiteness and large twist vanishing Lemma
- Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial Theorem
- Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space Theorem
- High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme Theorem
- Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data Theorem
- Projective bundle represents line quotients Theorem
- Serre duality for coherent sheaves on projective space Theorem
- Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness Theorem
- Veronese embedding pulls O(1) back to O(d) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Properties of Schemes, Section 28.27 (Tag 01PS) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, August 2022 draft, Section 17.4 (standard reference, not scraped)