Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cohomology, DVR/normality, degree and Cartier-divisor suppliers. It supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the curve Cartier-to-Weil route through AC implies DC implies countable choice. Let k be a field and let Pk1 be the projective line over k with standard affine chart U0=Spec⁡k[t], coordinate t=x1/x0, and point at infinity ∞=[0:1]=V(x0), the pole of t; the origin is the point [1:0]=V(x1) of U0, where t=0. Then:

  1. Pk1 is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k of genus 0;
  2. for every monic irreducible polynomial g∈k[t] of degree d, the closed point p=V(g) of U0 has [κ(p):k]=d and div⁡(g)=[p]−d[∞] for the divisor of the rational function g, so [p] is linearly equivalent to d[∞];
  3. the coordinate section x0 of O(1) vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so div⁡(x0)=[∞] and O(1)≅O(∞) with deg⁡kO(1)=1, while the other coordinate section x1 vanishes exactly at the origin, with div⁡(x1)=[ [1:0] ]=[V(x1)];
  4. every divisor D on Pk1 is linearly equivalent to deg⁡k(D)[∞]; consequently the degree homomorphism deg⁡k ⁣:CaDiv⁡(Pk1)/Prin⁡(Pk1)→Z is an isomorphism.

Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement wrote t=x1/x0 together with ∞=[1:0]=V(x1) and "the coordinate section x1". Those clauses are not simultaneously satisfiable: for g=t clause 2 would then read div⁡(t)=[p]−[∞]=0 at p=∞, and t is not constant. The statement above keeps every promised claim with the labels corrected to the running convention ∞=[0:1]=V(x0) of this page, and keeps the true statement about x1 as the final clause of (3).

Clauses 3 and 4 use the current interfaces Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve and Principal weil divisor and class group. Their roles are recorded in [F14].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cohomology, DVR/normality, degree and Cartier-divisor suppliers, with Dependent Choice supplied by AC implies DC implies countable choice; a field k, the projective line Pk1=P1 with its two standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[t] and U1=Spec⁡k[u], related on the overlap by t=u−1, and a monic irreducible polynomial g∈k[t] of degree d.

[F1]

A curve over k is a k-scheme that is geometrically integral, separated, of finite type and of chain dimension one; a smooth curve is a curve whose structure morphism is smooth in the local-standard-smooth convention, and a proper curve is one whose structure morphism is proper (Curves over a field, Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).

[F2]

The projective line Pk1 is the relative projective space Pk1 of Relative projective space from standard charts with standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[x1(0)] and U1=Spec⁡k[x0(1)] glued along D(x1(0)) and D(x0(1)) by x1(0)↦1/x0(1), and the charts and transitions are stable under base change; it is canonically Proj⁡k[x0,x1] (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). The two-affine model of Two-affine projective line and its twists is the gluing of the same two affine schemes along the same open subschemes by the same transition isomorphism and is therefore canonically isomorphic to Pk1 by the uniqueness clause of Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms; on the overlap the twists are glued with frames e0 on U0 and e∞ on U1 related by e∞=tne0 (Two-affine projective line and its twists, The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant, Twisting sheaf on Proj). In the identification with Proj⁡k[x0,x1], the origin [1:0]=V(x1) is the point t=0 of U0, and the point at infinity ∞=[0:1]=V(x0) is the point u=0 of U1, outside U0.

[F3]

PSn→S is proper and of finite type for every scheme S and every n≥0, and a proper morphism is separated (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Projective space is of finite type over its base, Proper morphisms). So Pk1→Spec⁡k is proper, separated and of finite type.

[F4]

A polynomial ring R[x1,…,xn] is a standard smooth R-algebra through the presentation with c=0 variables and g=1, and a morphism of finite-type k-schemes is smooth in the local-standard-smooth convention when every source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at the corresponding prime (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).

[F5]

dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(A) for a finite-type k-domain A (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree), in particular dim⁡k[t]=1 (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring); on a finite affine cover of a Noetherian space the chain dimension is the supremum of the chart dimensions (Dimension can be computed on an open cover, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Strict chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of Spec⁡A correspond to strict chains of prime ideals, since an irreducible closed Z is V(p) for its prime defining ideal and Z⊆Z′ matches the reverse inclusion of the ideals (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point).

[F6]

An affine scheme is integral when its coordinate ring is a nonzero domain; such a scheme is nonempty, reduced and irreducible, and a finite-type algebra over a field is Noetherian (Integral affine schemes, Reduced affine schemes). A space is irreducible exactly when it is nonempty and every two nonempty open subsets meet, equivalently when every nonempty open subset is dense; a nonempty open subspace of an irreducible space is irreducible (Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces). Geometric integrality means integrality of the algebraic-closure fibre (Curves over a field).

[F7]

For a point x of a scheme, κ(x)=OX,x/mx, and for p∈Spec⁡A one has κ(p)≅Frac⁡(A/p) (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme); a point of Spec⁡R is closed exactly when it is a maximal ideal (The closed points of the prime spectrum are exactly the maximal ideals); F[x] is a principal ideal domain and (p) is maximal exactly when the nonconstant p is irreducible (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain, For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible, and the quotient of F[x] by a maximal ideal is identified with the residue field by The residue field at a point of an affine scheme). For an algebraic element with minimal polynomial of degree n, the simple extension has degree n and power basis 1,a,…,an−1; the degree [K:F] is dim⁡FK (A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis 1,a,…,an−1 and degree n, The degree [K:F]=dim⁡FK of a finite field extension).

[F8]

A divisor on a curve is a finite formal Z-linear combination of closed points, its support is the finite set of points with nonzero coefficient, D=D+−D− for the positive and negative parts, D≥0 means D effective, and deg⁡kD=∑xnx[κ(x):k] is a group homomorphism (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Divisor support positive negative parts).

[F9]

For a closed point x of a smooth curve C over k the local ring OC,x is a discrete valuation ring with a uniformizer tx; every nonzero rational function f∈k(C)× has a well-defined order ord⁡x(f)∈Z, every nonzero element of OC,x is a unit times a power of tx, and the order is a group homomorphism, so it is additive in products and vanishes on units (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations).

[F10]

For an integral finite-type k-scheme X the stalk at the generic point is the function field and is canonically Frac⁡Γ(U,OX) for every nonempty affine open U, so k(P1)=k(t)=Frac⁡k[t] here (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme); k[t] is a unique factorisation domain, so every nonzero element of k(t) is a unit of k times a finite product of powers of monic irreducible polynomials (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain, Every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain).

[F11]

H0(Pk1,O(d)) is the degree-d part k[x0,x1]d of the polynomial ring for d≥0 and vanishes for d<0; the coordinate forms x0,x1 are global sections of O(1) (Global sections of projective twists, Twisting sheaf on Proj); and H1(Pk1,O(d))=0 for every d≥−1, in particular H1(Pk1,O)=0 (Top cohomology of projective twists). The genus of a smooth proper geometrically integral curve is g(C)=h1(C,OC)=dim⁡kH1(C,OC) (Genus via the Euler characteristic).

[F12]

A rational section of an invertible sheaf L on an integral scheme is a nonzero element of the one-dimensional K(X)-vector space Lη: a nonzero global section whose stalk at the generic point is nonzero qualifies (Rational section line bundle). On U0 the twist O(1) is free with frame x0 and on U1 with frame x1, since x1=tx0 on the overlap; under the identification of the two models with the two-affine frames e0,e∞ of [F2], these frames correspond as x0↔e0 and x1↔e∞, so x1=tx0 is the relation e∞=te0 [F2].

[F13]

Cartier divisors form a group CaDiv⁡(X) whose elements have local meromorphic equations, and the principal Cartier divisors — the images of global meromorphic units — form a subgroup Prin⁡(X); the quotient CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡(X) is the group of linear equivalence classes (Cartier divisor).

[F14]

Cartier, Weil, and Picard interfaces. The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor constructs OX(D) by local equations, gives OX(0)≅OX, and uses the sign convention positive for zeros. The current Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors associates to a nonzero rational section s its Cartier divisor div⁡(s) and an isomorphism O(div⁡(s))≅L carrying the canonical section to s. The current Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve identifies Cartier divisors and Weil divisors on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve and preserves principal divisors. The degree of an invertible sheaf is the homomorphism supplied by The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve, with deg⁡kOC(D)=deg⁡kD; the principal Weil divisor subgroup is defined in Principal weil divisor and class group. Regular local domains are integrally closed by regular local rings are normal, as used in [F9] to establish normality before applying the degree homomorphism. AC supplies the DC premise in the Cartier-to-Weil source through AC implies DC implies countable choice.

Proof

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cohomology, DVR/normality, degree and Cartier-divisor suppliers, with Dependent Choice supplied by AC implies DC implies countable choice; a field k, the projective line Pk1=P1 with its two standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[t] and U1=Spec⁡k[u], related on the overlap by t=u−1, and a monic irreducible polynomial g∈k[t] of degree d.

[F1] A curve over k is a k-scheme that is geometrically integral, separated, of finite type and of chain dimension one; a smooth curve is a curve whose structure morphism is smooth in the local-standard-smooth convention, and a proper curve is one whose structure morphism is proper (Curves over a field, Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).

[F2] The projective line Pk1 is the relative projective space Pk1 of Relative projective space from standard charts with standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[x1(0)] and U1=Spec⁡k[x0(1)] glued along D(x1(0)) and D(x0(1)) by x1(0)↦1/x0(1), and the charts and transitions are stable under base change; it is canonically Proj⁡k[x0,x1] (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). The two-affine model of Two-affine projective line and its twists is the gluing of the same two affine schemes along the same open subschemes by the same transition isomorphism and is therefore canonically isomorphic to Pk1 by the uniqueness clause of Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms; on the overlap the twists are glued with frames e0 on U0 and e∞ on U1 related by e∞=tne0 (Two-affine projective line and its twists, The twist index on the projective line is an isomorphism invariant, Twisting sheaf on Proj). In the identification with Proj⁡k[x0,x1], the origin [1:0]=V(x1) is the point t=0 of U0, and the point at infinity ∞=[0:1]=V(x0) is the point u=0 of U1, outside U0.

[F3] PSn→S is proper and of finite type for every scheme S and every n≥0, and a proper morphism is separated (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Projective space is of finite type over its base, Proper morphisms). So Pk1→Spec⁡k is proper, separated and of finite type.

[F4] A polynomial ring R[x1,…,xn] is a standard smooth R-algebra through the presentation with c=0 variables and g=1, and a morphism of finite-type k-schemes is smooth in the local-standard-smooth convention when every source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at the corresponding prime (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).

[F5] dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(A) for a finite-type k-domain A (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree), in particular dim⁡k[t]=1 (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring); on a finite affine cover of a Noetherian space the chain dimension is the supremum of the chart dimensions (Dimension can be computed on an open cover, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Strict chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets of Spec⁡A correspond to strict chains of prime ideals, since an irreducible closed Z is V(p) for its prime defining ideal and Z⊆Z′ matches the reverse inclusion of the ideals (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point).

[F6] An affine scheme is integral when its coordinate ring is a nonzero domain; such a scheme is nonempty, reduced and irreducible, and a finite-type algebra over a field is Noetherian (Integral affine schemes, Reduced affine schemes). A space is irreducible exactly when it is nonempty and every two nonempty open subsets meet, equivalently when every nonempty open subset is dense; a nonempty open subspace of an irreducible space is irreducible (Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces). Geometric integrality means integrality of the algebraic-closure fibre (Curves over a field).

[F7] For a point x of a scheme, κ(x)=OX,x/mx, and for p∈Spec⁡A one has κ(p)≅Frac⁡(A/p) (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme); a point of Spec⁡R is closed exactly when it is a maximal ideal (The closed points of the prime spectrum are exactly the maximal ideals); F[x] is a principal ideal domain and (p) is maximal exactly when the nonconstant p is irreducible (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain, For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible, and the quotient of F[x] by a maximal ideal is identified with the residue field by The residue field at a point of an affine scheme). For an algebraic element with minimal polynomial of degree n, the simple extension has degree n and power basis 1,a,…,an−1; the degree [K:F] is dim⁡FK (A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis 1,a,…,an−1 and degree n, The degree [K:F]=dim⁡FK of a finite field extension).

[F8] A divisor on a curve is a finite formal Z-linear combination of closed points, its support is the finite set of points with nonzero coefficient, D=D+−D− for the positive and negative parts, D≥0 means D effective, and deg⁡kD=∑xnx[κ(x):k] is a group homomorphism (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Divisor support positive negative parts).

[F9] For a closed point x of a smooth curve C over k the local ring OC,x is a discrete valuation ring with a uniformizer tx; every nonzero rational function f∈k(C)× has a well-defined order ord⁡x(f)∈Z, every nonzero element of OC,x is a unit times a power of tx, and the order is a group homomorphism, so it is additive in products and vanishes on units (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations).

[F10] For an integral finite-type k-scheme X the stalk at the generic point is the function field and is canonically Frac⁡Γ(U,OX) for every nonempty affine open U, so k(P1)=k(t)=Frac⁡k[t] here (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme); k[t] is a unique factorisation domain, so every nonzero element of k(t) is a unit of k times a finite product of powers of monic irreducible polynomials (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain, Every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain).

[F11] H0(Pk1,O(d)) is the degree-d part k[x0,x1]d of the polynomial ring for d≥0 and vanishes for d<0; the coordinate forms x0,x1 are global sections of O(1) (Global sections of projective twists, Twisting sheaf on Proj); and H1(Pk1,O(d))=0 for every d≥−1, in particular H1(Pk1,O)=0 (Top cohomology of projective twists). The genus of a smooth proper geometrically integral curve is g(C)=h1(C,OC)=dim⁡kH1(C,OC) (Genus via the Euler characteristic).

[F12] A rational section of an invertible sheaf L on an integral scheme is a nonzero element of the one-dimensional K(X)-vector space Lη: a nonzero global section whose stalk at the generic point is nonzero qualifies (Rational section line bundle). On U0 the twist O(1) is free with frame x0 and on U1 with frame x1, since x1=tx0 on the overlap; under the identification of the two models with the two-affine frames e0,e∞ of [F2], these frames correspond as x0↔e0 and x1↔e∞, so x1=tx0 is the relation e∞=te0 [F2].

[F13] Cartier divisors form a group CaDiv⁡(X) whose elements have local meromorphic equations, and the principal Cartier divisors — the images of global meromorphic units — form a subgroup Prin⁡(X); the quotient CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡(X) is the group of linear equivalence classes (Cartier divisor).

[F14] Cartier, Weil, and Picard interfaces. The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor constructs OX(D) by local equations, gives OX(0)≅OX, and uses the sign convention positive for zeros. The current Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors associates to a nonzero rational section s its Cartier divisor div⁡(s) and an isomorphism O(div⁡(s))≅L carrying the canonical section to s. The current Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve identifies Cartier divisors and Weil divisors on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve and preserves principal divisors. The degree of an invertible sheaf is the homomorphism supplied by The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve, with deg⁡kOC(D)=deg⁡kD; the principal Weil divisor subgroup is defined in Principal weil divisor and class group. Regular local domains are integrally closed by regular local rings are normal, as used in [F9] to establish normality before applying the degree homomorphism. AC supplies the DC premise in the Cartier-to-Weil source through AC implies DC implies countable choice.

Proof technique: establish the projective-line curve hypotheses first; then compute the closed-point orders, the coordinate divisors and their degrees, and finally reduce every divisor to a multiple of infinity.

1.1F2

Chart data and the two special points. By [F2] the charts U0 and U1 cover Pk1, with overlap Spec⁡k[t,t−1]=Spec⁡k[u,u−1] and t=u−1. The complement of U0 is the point u=0 in U1, namely ∞=[0:1]=V(x0); the origin [1:0]=V(x1) is the point t=0 in U0.

1.2F2F7

Closed points. The closed points of U0=Spec⁡k[t] are the maximal ideals (g) generated by monic irreducible polynomials g∈k[t], by [F7]. For such a g of degree d, its homogenization x0dg(x1/x0) defines a closed point in U0 and does not vanish at ∞, since its value at [0:1] is 1. The only point outside U0 is ∞, which is closed on U1. Thus the closed points of Pk1 are the points p=V(g) for monic irreducible g, together with ∞. Every nonempty open subset meets U0, since {∞} is not open.

1.3F3

Properness and finite type. By [F3] the structure morphism Pk1→Spec⁡k is proper and of finite type; a proper morphism is separated, so Pk1 is separated over k.

1.4F2F5F6

Chain dimension one. The two charts are spectra of the Noetherian rings k[t] and k[u], each of dimension one by [F5]. The finite affine cover makes Pk1 Noetherian, and [F5] computes its chain dimension as the supremum of the chart dimensions, namely one.

1.5F1F2F3F4

Smoothness. Each chart ring k[t] or k[u] is standard smooth over k through the presentation with no equations and one free variable, by [F4]. The charts cover the source, so the structure morphism is smooth in the convention of [F1].

2.1F2F6step 1.2

Integrality and geometric integrality. Any two nonempty open subsets of Pk1 meet U0 by step 1.2, and their intersections with U0 meet because k[t] is a domain. Hence Pk1 is irreducible. Its local rings are localizations of k[t] or k[u], so they are domains and the scheme is reduced; it is therefore integral. After base change to an algebraic closure kˉ, [F2] gives the same two-chart description with kˉ[t] and kˉ[u], so the same irreducibility and reducedness proof shows that the base change is integral. Thus Pk1 is geometrically integral.

2.2F7step 1.2

Residue degrees of finite points. Let g∈k[t] be monic irreducible of degree d and let p=V(g). Its residue field is k[t]/(g), a simple extension generated by the class of t with minimal polynomial g; by [F7], [κ(p):k]=d. At infinity the residue field is k, since ∞ is the maximal ideal (u) of k[u].

3.1F11step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 2.1

Genus zero. Steps 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 2.1 show that Pk1 is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve. By [F11], H1(Pk1,OPk1)=H1(Pk1,OPk1(0))=0; the genus definition in [F11] therefore gives g(Pk1)=0.

3.2F9F10F14step 1.3step 2.1

Normality. For each closed point the local ring is a DVR by [F9], and the generic local ring is the function field k(t), a field by [F10]. These local rings are regular; by the regular-local normality theorem in [F14] they are integrally closed. Hence Pk1 is normal as well as proper, so the degree homomorphism on its Picard group in [F14] applies.

3.3F7F9F10step 1.1step 1.5step 2.1

Local orders of g. For p=V(g), the local ring is k[t](g); the maximal ideal is generated by the uniformizer g, so ord⁡p(g)=1. At every other finite point V(g′), with g′ a distinct monic irreducible, g is a unit and its order is zero. At infinity put u=t−1. Writing g(t)=td+cd−1td−1+⋯+c0=u−dh(u), where h(0)=1, shows that h is a unit in k[u](u) and ord⁡∞(g)=−d. These are the DVR orders of [F9], applicable now that the curve hypotheses have been established.

3.4F2F11F12F14step 1.1step 2.1

Coordinate sections and their divisors. By [F11] the global sections x0,x1 lie in H0(Pk1,O(1)). The sheaf O(1) has frame x0 on U0 and frame x1 on U1, with x1=tx0. Therefore x0 has local coefficients 1 on U0 and u on U1, while x1 has coefficients t on U0 and 1 on U1; these nonzero global sections qualify as rational sections by [F12]. By the rational-section dictionary of [F14], div⁡(x0)=[∞] and div⁡(x1)=[1:0]=[V(x1)], with the latter the origin. The same dictionary identifies O(div⁡(x0)) with O(1).

3.5F8F9F14step 1.5step 2.1

Additivity of the divisor map. For f1,f2∈k(t)×, additivity of each DVR order in [F9] gives div⁡(f1f2)=div⁡(f1)+div⁡(f2); constants in k× are units at every point and have zero divisor.

4.1F8F14step 3.2step 2.2step 3.4

Degree of O(1). By step 3.2 the proper curve Pk1 is normal, so [F14] gives deg⁡kO(1)=deg⁡kdiv⁡(x0)=deg⁡k[∞]. Since [κ(∞):k]=1 by step 2.2, this degree is 1. Thus O(1)≅O(∞) and has degree one, as in clause 3.

4.2F8F13F14step 2.2step 3.3

The divisor of a monic irreducible. By step 3.3 the only nonzero orders of g occur at p=V(g) and ∞, with orders 1 and −d. Thus div⁡(g)=[p]−d[∞]. Its degree is deg⁡k([p]−d[∞])=[κ(p):k]−d[κ(∞):k]=d−d=0, using [κ(p):k]=d and [κ(∞):k]=1 from step 2.2. The divisor is principal by [F14], so [p] is linearly equivalent to d[∞]. This proves clause 2.

5.1F8F10step 2.2step 4.2step 3.5

Principal divisors have degree zero. By [F10], every nonzero f∈k(t) has a finite factorization c∏igini with c∈k×, distinct monic irreducibles gi, and integers ni. By step 3.5 and step 4.2, div⁡(f)=∑ini([pi]−di[∞]). Each summand has degree [κ(pi):k]−di[κ(∞):k]=di−di=0, so additivity of divisor degree gives deg⁡kdiv⁡(f)=0.

5.2F8F13step 1.2step 4.2step 3.5

Every divisor is linearly equivalent to its degree times infinity. Let D=∑xnx[x] be any divisor on Pk1. By step 1.2, its finite support consists of points pi=V(gi) for monic irreducibles gi of degrees di, together with a possible term m[∞]. Thus D=∑ini[pi]+m[∞], where each ni∈Z, and deg⁡kD=∑inidi+m by [F8]. Using step 4.2 for each gi and the finite product ∏igini∈k(t)×, including negative exponents, gives D−deg⁡k(D)[∞]=∑ini([pi]−di[∞])=div⁡ ⁣(∏igini). Hence D∼deg⁡k(D)[∞], proving the first assertion of clause 4.

6.1F8F14step 4.1step 5.1step 5.2

The degree isomorphism on Weil divisor classes. Degree is surjective because deg⁡k(m[∞])=m for every m∈Z. It vanishes on principal divisors by step 5.1, so it descends to Div⁡(Pk1)/Prin⁡(Pk1)→Z. If a divisor has degree zero, step 5.2 makes it principal; thus the descended map is injective and is an isomorphism.

7.1F13F14step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 2.1step 6.1

The Cartier divisor-class statement. By the Cartier-to-Weil isomorphism in [F14], established for the smooth proper geometrically integral curve in steps 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 2.1, the map CaDiv⁡(Pk1)→Div⁡(Pk1) is an isomorphism compatible with principal divisors. It therefore induces an isomorphism of the corresponding divisor-class groups. Transporting the degree isomorphism of step 6.1 proves deg⁡k:CaDiv⁡(Pk1)/Prin⁡(Pk1)⟶Z is an isomorphism.

8.1F5F9F10F11F14step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 2.1step 3.1step 3.4step 4.1step 4.2step 7.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 2.1 and 3.1 prove clause 1, step 4.2 proves clause 2, steps 3.4 and 4.1 prove clause 3, and step 7.1 proves clause 4. The Axiom of Choice enters through the cohomology, local DVR, UFD and Cartier/Picard suppliers; AC supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the curve Cartier-to-Weil and degree routes by AC implies DC implies countable choice. All other listings and products are finite and all fields k and polynomial degrees d≥1 are allowed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

215 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources