Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A principal divisor of degree zero on the projective line

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor and projective-line cohomology suppliers.

Let k be a field and let Pk1 have coordinate t=x1/x0 on the standard chart U0=Spec⁡k[t], with point at infinity ∞=[0:1]=V(x0) (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree). Let a≠b be distinct k-rational points of U0, so a,b∈k and the associated closed points are [a]=V(t−a) and [b]=V(t−b). The rational function f=t−at−b ∈ k(t)× has divisor div⁡(f)=[a]−[b], which is a principal divisor of degree deg⁡k([a]−[b])=1−1=0. Its divisor class satisfies the degree shift and Riemann-Roch numerically: the attached invertible sheaf O(div⁡f)=O([a])⊗O([b])−1 is isomorphic to OPk1, since the class of a principal divisor is trivial and since deg⁡kdiv⁡(f)=0 on Pk1 forces the class to be trivial under the isomorphism Pic⁡(Pk1)→Z (The Picard group of the projective line). Hence l(div⁡f)=h0(O)=1,i(div⁡f)=h1(O)=0, by the explicit cohomology of the structure sheaf (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists). Alternatively L(div⁡f) is the one-dimensional k-space spanned by 1/f=t−bt−a, because div⁡(g)+div⁡(f)≥0 for a nonzero g∈k(t) is equivalent to div⁡(gf)≥0, and a rational function on Pk1 with no poles is constant. In particular f∉L(div⁡f): the divisor div⁡(f)+div⁡(f)=2[a]−2[b] is not effective, so the nonzero elements of L(div⁡f) are the scalar multiples of 1/f and not those of f. Hence χ(O(div⁡f))=1=χ(O) with deg⁡kdiv⁡(f)=0, and Riemann-Roch reads 1−0=0+1−0 on both sides, the right-hand side being deg⁡kdiv⁡(f)+1−g with g=g(Pk1)=0 (Riemann-Roch as l minus i). The same computation for f=g(t) a monic polynomial of degree d gives div⁡(g)=Z(g)−d[∞],Z(g)=∑imi[pi], where g=∏igimi is the factorisation of g into monic irreducibles gi of degree di and pi=V(gi); this divisor has degree ∑imidi−d=0, showing that the individual zero and pole parts need not be trivial even though the class is principal.

Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement claimed that "alternatively L(div⁡f) consists of the scalar multiples of f because div⁡(g)+div⁡(f)≥0 forces g/f to have no poles". That is false as written: the condition is equivalent to div⁡(gf)≥0, hence to gf∈k, so L(div⁡f) consists of the scalar multiples of 1/f, and f itself is not in L(div⁡f) because 2[a]−2[b] is not effective. The statement above keeps every other promised claim and records the corrected spanning function; the general degree-zero claim is deg⁡k([a]−[b])=0, computed directly below.

The current principal-divisor, Cartier/Picard, and line-bundle interfaces used below are Principal weil divisor and class group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve. The degree zero asserted for this example is computed explicitly from [a]−[b]; no general principal-divisor degree theorem is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor and projective-line cohomology suppliers; a field k, the projective line Pk1 with chart U0=Spec⁡k[t], coordinate t and point at infinity ∞=[0:1]; distinct k-rational points a≠b, with closed points [a]=V(t−a) and [b]=V(t−b); and the rational function f=(t−a)/(t−b)∈k(t)×.

[F1]

Projective-line data: Pk1 is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k of genus 0; for every monic irreducible g∈k[t] of degree d the closed point p=V(g) of U0 has [κ(p):k]=d and div⁡(g)=[p]−d[∞]; every divisor D on Pk1 is linearly equivalent to deg⁡k(D)[∞], and the degree homomorphism deg⁡k from CaDiv⁡(Pk1)/Prin⁡(Pk1) to Z is an isomorphism (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).

[F2]

Divisors and orders: a divisor on a curve is a finite formal Z-linear combination of closed points, with effectiveness read coefficientwise; for a closed point x of a smooth curve the order ord⁡x at x is a homomorphism on k(C)×, so ord⁡x(gh)=ord⁡x(g)+ord⁡x(h), and ord⁡x(f)≥0 exactly when f is regular at x (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Order codimension one rational function).

[F3]

Degree: the k-degree of a divisor is deg⁡k(D)=∑xnx[κ(x):k], a group homomorphism Div⁡(C)→Z; for a rational point x one has [κ(x):k]=1 (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).

[F4]

The Riemann-Roch space: for a divisor D on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, L(D)={g∈k(C)×:div⁡(g)+D≥0}∪{0} is the k-subspace of functions whose poles are no worse than −D, membership being read coefficientwise as ord⁡x(g)+nx≥0 at every closed point x, and the divisor of a rational function is div⁡(g)=∑xord⁡x(g)[x] (The space L(D)).

[F5]

The integer l(D)=dim⁡kL(D)=h0(D)=dim⁡kH0(C,OC(D)) is the dimension of the Riemann-Roch space, with hi(D)=dim⁡kHi(C,OC(D)); in particular l(0)=1 for the zero divisor (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The space L(D)).

[F6]

The polynomial ring F[x] over a field is a unique factorisation domain (For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain).

[F7]

Sections of the structure sheaf: OX(0)=OX for the twisting sheaf of Proj⁡, and H0(Pk1,OPk1(0))≅k[x0,x1]0, so h0(OPk1)=1 (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Global sections of projective twists).

[F8]

Top cohomology vanishes: H1(Pk1,OPk1(0))=0, so h1(OPk1)=0 (Top cohomology of projective twists).

[F9]

Riemann-Roch: for every divisor D on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus g one has l(D)−i(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g with i(D)=h1(D)≥0 (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).

[F10]

Degree shift of the Euler characteristic: χ(C,OC(D))−χ(C,OC)=deg⁡k(D) for every divisor D, where χ=h0−h1 (Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift).

[F11]

The Picard group of the projective line is Z: the degree homomorphism induces an isomorphism Pic⁡(Pk1)→Z, so an invertible sheaf of degree zero is isomorphic to OPk1 (The Picard group of the projective line).

[F12]

The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor attaches the sheaf to a Cartier divisor; Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves gives its tensor and dual identities; On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group identifies principal divisors with the trivial line-bundle class; Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve identifies Cartier and Weil divisors on this smooth curve; and Principal weil divisor and class group supplies the principal-divisor convention. These interfaces give O(div⁡f)≅O and the displayed tensor expression. The degree zero in this example is computed directly from [a]−[b].

[F13]

The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers named above; the computations below select nothing beyond the given points and functions (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct computation of $\operatorname{div}(f)$ and of $L(\operatorname{div}f)$ on $\mathbb P^1_k$ from the order of vanishing at the closed points, compared with the explicit cohomology of $\mathcal O$ and the Riemann-Roch identity
1.1F1F3F6

The two rational points and the divisors of t−a, t−b. The polynomials t−a and t−b are monic of degree 1, hence irreducible in k[t]: a factorisation into non-units would give two factors of degree at least one, whose degrees add to 1. So both are monic irreducibles of degree d=1, and by [F1] applied to g=t−a and to g=t−b, div⁡(t−a)=[a]−[∞],div⁡(t−b)=[b]−[∞], with [κ(a):k]=1=[κ(b):k]. Since a≠b, the maximal ideals (t−a)≠(t−b) are distinct, so [a]≠[b] and [a]−[b]≠0.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

The divisor of f. The order at a closed point is additive in products and quotients [F2], so for every closed point x, ord⁡x(f)=ord⁡x(t−a)−ord⁡x(t−b). Summing against [x] as in [F4] and using step 1.1, div⁡(f)=div⁡(t−a)−div⁡(t−b)=[a]−[∞]−[b]+[∞]=[a]−[b]. This is a principal divisor by construction — it is the divisor of the nonzero rational function f — and its degree is deg⁡k([a]−[b])=[κ(a):k]−[κ(b):k]=1−1=0 by [F3] and step 1.1. In particular the zero part [a] and the pole part [b] are individually nontrivial while the total degree vanishes.

2.2F1F2F3F6step 1.1

A general monic polynomial. Let g∈k[t] be monic of degree d≥0. By [F6] it factors as g=∏igimi with pairwise distinct monic irreducibles gi of degree di and exponents mi≥1, where ∑imidi=d. Setting pi=V(gi) and Z(g)=∑imi[pi], additivity [F2] and the divisor formula of [F1] give div⁡(g)=∑imidiv⁡(gi)=∑imi([pi]−di[∞])=Z(g)−d[∞], a principal divisor; its degree is deg⁡kZ(g)−deg⁡k(d[∞])=∑imidi−d=0 by [F3] and the residue-degree formula [κ(pi):k]=di of [F1]. For d≥1 the zero part Z(g) and the pole part d[∞] are both nonzero, while Z(g)∼d[∞] because their difference is the principal divisor div⁡(g); for d=0 the polynomial is g=1 and div⁡(g)=0, which is the case Z(g)=0 and 0[∞]=0 of the formula. Taking g=t−a recovers div⁡(t−a)=[a]−[∞] of step 1.1.

3.1F1F11F12step 2.1

The triviality of the class and the sheaf. Since div⁡(f) is principal, its class in CaDiv⁡(Pk1)/Prin⁡(Pk1) is zero, and the degree isomorphism of [F1] is injective, so the class of a degree-zero divisor is trivial: div⁡(f)∼0 by step 2.1. By the current Cartier/Picard dictionary [F12], the principal-divisor case of the sheaf attachment gives O(div⁡f)≅OPk1(0)≅OPk1, and the tensor identities give O(div⁡f)≅O([a])⊗O([b])−1; the same conclusion via degrees uses [F11], under which a degree-zero invertible sheaf on Pk1 is isomorphic to OPk1.

3.2F1F2F4F5F6step 2.1

The sections of div⁡(f), directly. Let g∈k(t)×. By [F4], g∈L(div⁡f) if and only if ord⁡x(g)+ord⁡x(f)≥0 at every closed point x, which by the additivity of [F2] is the same as ord⁡x(gf)≥0 at every closed point x, that is div⁡(gf)≥0 by [F4]. So g∈L(div⁡f) if and only if gf∈L(0), and the space L(0) is the constant field k: a nonzero rational function h∈k(t)× factors by [F6] as h=c∏igini with c∈k×, pairwise distinct monic irreducibles gi of degree di and exponents ni∈Z, so that div⁡(h)=∑ini([pi]−di[∞]) by [F1] and the additivity of the orders [F2]; effectivity forces ni≥0 for every i (from the coefficient at pi) and −∑inidi≥0 (from the coefficient at ∞), and since di≥1 while ni≥0 this gives ni=0 for all i and h=c. Hence g∈L(div⁡f) if and only if gf=c for some c∈k, i.e. L(div⁡f)=k⋅(1/f), a one-dimensional space spanned by 1/f=(t−b)/(t−a), and l(div⁡f)=1 by [F5]. In particular f∉L(div⁡f): the function f corresponds to c=gf=f2∉k, and directly div⁡(f)+div⁡(f)=2[a]−2[b] has coefficient −2<0 at [b], so it is not effective.

4.1F5F7F8F12step 3.1step 3.2

The cohomological reading. By step 3.1, O(div⁡f)≅OPk1; by [F7] the structure sheaf has h0(OPk1)=1, and by [F8] it has h1(OPk1)=0. Therefore l(div⁡f)=h0(div⁡f)=1 and i(div⁡f)=h1(div⁡f)=0, in agreement with the direct computation of step 3.2; here l(D)=h0(D) and i(D)=h1(D) are the dimensions attached to D and its sheaf [F5], the sheaf-theoretic equality being the current dictionary [F12].

5.1F1F9F10step 2.1step 4.1

Riemann-Roch and the Euler characteristic. The Euler characteristics are χ(OPk1)=h0(O)−h1(O)=1−0=1 and, by step 4.1, χ(O(div⁡f))=h0(div⁡f)−h1(div⁡f)=1−0=1, so χ(O(div⁡f))=χ(O) as the degree shift [F10] requires for the degree-zero divisor div⁡(f): χ(O(div⁡f))−χ(O)=0=deg⁡kdiv⁡(f) by step 2.1. Riemann-Roch [F9] reads l(div⁡f)−i(div⁡f)=1−0=1=deg⁡kdiv⁡(f)+1−g=0+1−0, the genus of the projective line being g=g(Pk1)=0 by [F1] and the degree being computed in step 2.1.

6.1F10F12F13step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1∎

Assembly and the current supplier route. Step 2.1 computes div⁡(f)=[a]−[b] of degree zero, step 3.1 identifies the divisor class as trivial and the attached sheaf as OPk1, steps 3.2 and 4.1 compute L(div⁡f)=k⋅(1/f) and (l,i)=(1,0), step 5.1 reads the degree shift and Riemann-Roch as 1−0=0+1−0, and step 2.2 gives div⁡(g)=Z(g)−d[∞] for every monic polynomial of degree d. The sheaf identifications of steps 3.1 and 4.1 use the current interfaces [F12]; the degree-zero claim is computed explicitly in step 2.1, and the direct divisor calculations of steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.2 use the current order route. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F13]: the functions f, 1/f and the factorisations are exhibited by formulas, and no family of objects is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

122 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources