How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normalization Finiteness for Affine Domains
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sequences and Limits
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
These examples and counterexamples exercise the Euler-characteristic form of Riemann–Roch on explicit curves and divisors, and record the failure modes that the page's deliberately one-sided statements leave open.
On the projective line the theorem is an identity between computed numbers. For the divisor spaces are with dimensions and , so for every integer , including the negative range where the left-hand side is the negative of the index of speciality. A negative right-hand side is therefore not a contradiction: for with the identity reads , and the negative lower bound cannot count or ensure nonzero sections. At both cohomology dimensions are zero: the equality and the count of zero independent sections are consistent, while the bound still ensures no nonzero section. On the same curve, principal divisors of degree zero are computed from rational functions: the divisor of is , its class is trivial by the classification of divisors on , and , on both sides of Riemann–Roch.
The genus-zero boundary cases separate the geometric and arithmetic behaviour. A smooth plane conic with a rational point has arithmetic genus zero and a divisor of degree one, so it is isomorphic to the projective line and the projection from the rational point computes its divisor spaces; the conic over has the same arithmetic genus and no rational point, so it carries no divisor of degree one and is not isomorphic to , although it becomes a projective line after base change to . The empty divisor exhibits the normalization at the heart of the definitions: and , so , the system is a single point in every genus, and the zero divisor is nonspecial exactly in genus zero.
The remaining examples test the point-addition and positivity statements. The jump satisfies ; both endpoints occur on the projective line, and intermediate values can occur: over , the point has residue degree two, while gives a jump of one; the zero divisor of a curve of positive genus, for instance a smooth plane quartic, shows that the Riemann inequality is strict for special divisors by exactly ; a pencil spanned by and a function with poles only at one point realizes the finite morphism to the projective line constructed on the main page, with the fibre over infinity equal to the pole divisor; and a sufficiently positive divisor in a fixed ample direction is nonspecial, so Riemann–Roch counts its sections exactly. The example keeps the fixed-direction threshold of the vanishing theorem and does not assert the universal bound above degree , which requires the duality pair that follows.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Riemann-Roch on the projective line for every degree
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current projective-line cohomology and divisor/Picard suppliers.
Let be a field, let have coordinate with point at infinity , and let for an integer . Since is isomorphic to — the class of the point at infinity generates with corresponding to (The Picard group of the projective line) — the explicit cohomology of the twists gives the values being read off from Global sections of projective twists and Top cohomology of projective twists. Hence with for every integer : on the projective line Riemann-Roch is an identity between explicit numbers, including the negative-degree range where and compensates. The divisors of degree at least are exactly the nonspecial ones here, and the complete linear system of Complete linear system is nonempty exactly for .
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement cited
the examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d for the
cohomology of the twists. That item is homed on the examples page
cohomology-of-quasi-coherent-sheaves-on-affine-and-projective-schemes-examples,
and an examples-page item may not depend on another examples-page item, so the
citation is replaced here by the published A-page corollaries
Global sections of projective twists and
Top cohomology of projective twists, which contain the same values for
; every promised claim is preserved. The example's negative-degree
compensation clause is also corrected to and with
, so that the displayed identity is true at every .
The current Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line give the divisor-to-twist identification used in the calculation. The dimension notation is supplied by The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D) and Special and nonspecial divisors, and the complete linear system by Complete linear system.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current projective-line cohomology and divisor/Picard suppliers; a field , the projective line with coordinate and point at infinity , and the divisor for an integer .
Projective-line data: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus ; the coordinate section of vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so and with ; every divisor is linearly equivalent to , and the degree homomorphism on divisor classes is an isomorphism, so linearly equivalent divisors have equal degree and (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, The Picard group of the projective line).
Global sections: for and one has for and for ; the monomials for form a -basis of , so for and for (Global sections of projective twists).
Top cohomology: for the group vanishes for and for it is free of rank over ; so for and for (Top cohomology of projective twists).
Degree: for a divisor the -degree is , sum over the finite support, and it is a group homomorphism on the divisor group (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve).
Riemann-Roch dimensions: and , so and for the attached sheaf (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D)).
Riemann-Roch: with , and exactly for the nonspecial divisors (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Special and nonspecial divisors).
Nonspeciality: is nonspecial exactly when , and special exactly when ; equivalently nonspeciality is the equality case (Special and nonspecial divisors).
The complete linear system is in bijection with the set of -lines in and is empty exactly when (Complete linear system).
The current Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line identify the divisor class and attached twist; The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D), Special and nonspecial divisors and Complete linear system supply the dimension and linear-system interpretations.
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers named above; the computations below evaluate explicit formulas and select nothing (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Degree and attached sheaf. By [F1] the residue degree of the point at infinity is and the degree homomorphism is defined on linear-equivalence classes, so for the degree is by [F4]. By [F1] the class of generates with , so by the current divisor/Picard route [F9] one has ; hence and by [F5], and by [F1].
The explicit values. By [F2] applied with and , the space has dimension for and vanishes for , because has dimension as the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree in two variables; hence . By [F3] applied with , for , that is for , while for its rank is ; hence . Combining with step 1.1, for every integer .
Riemann-Roch as an identity between explicit numbers. If then , so , while gives ; then . If instead then , so , while gives ; then . In both cases, by step 1.1, which is [F6] with and ; the two cases and exhaust and meet no other, and for the section space is compensated by , while at both dimensions and the right-hand side are zero, so the right-hand side stays correct even where it is negative.
Nonspecialty and the complete linear system. By [F7] the divisor is nonspecial exactly when , that is exactly when , i.e. : the divisors of degree at least are exactly the nonspecial ones, and by [F6] the same threshold is the equality case of the Riemann inequality, while for one has and is special. For the complete linear system, if then is an effective divisor and is linearly equivalent to itself, so and is nonempty; if and is effective with linearly equivalent to , then by the well-definedness of the degree homomorphism on classes [F1], while effectivity gives and hence by [F4] and , a contradiction; so is empty for . This agrees with [F8], under which is in bijection with the -lines in : by step 2.1, is at least exactly for .
Assembly and choice accounting. Step 2.1 computes and ; step 3.1 verifies for every integer by an exhaustive case check on versus ; step 3.2 identifies the nonspecial divisors with the degrees and shows nonempty exactly for , in agreement with the section dimension. The sheaf identification and the identity of step 1.1 use the current interfaces [F9]; the numerical values of steps 2.1 and 3.1 depend on them only through that identification, and the cohomology values themselves are the published A-page corollaries [F2] and [F3]. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F10]; every value above is computed from explicit formulas, and no family of objects is selected.
A smooth conic with a rational point is a projective line
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current plane-genus, rational-point and cohomology suppliers.
Let be a field of characteristic not two, let be a smooth plane conic that is a curve (integral of dimension one — the hypothesis under which Arithmetic genus of a plane curve applies), and let be a -rational point. Then:
- , so is a divisor of degree one (Degree divisor proper curve);
- A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line applies once : Arithmetic genus of a plane curve gives arithmetic genus , which for a smooth curve is the genus, and a degree-one divisor is present, so ;
- under such an isomorphism the degree-one divisor corresponds to a degree-one divisor of , and the projective-line computation gives and (Global sections of projective twists); dimensions of cohomology are invariant under isomorphism, so Riemann-Roch on reads , forcing , and the two-dimensional space is spanned by and a coordinate function with a single simple pole at , the coordinate of the isomorphism supplied by the rational-point theorem.
The classical form of this computation is the projection parametrisation: for
each line through the residual intersection pairs the
second point of with , giving the pencil and the
coordinate above; the reverse direction — that the quadratic Veronese image
of is such a conic — is the batch-6 examples-page item
ex-quadratic-veronese-conic, which is not consumable here because
examples-page items are leaves.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the
examples-page items ex-quadratic-veronese-conic and
ex-rational-parametrization-circle-conic. Both are leaves and cannot carry a
load; the citations are replaced by the A-page rational-point theorem
A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line, the published A-page
computation of
Global sections of projective twists, and the local
argument of items 1–3. Every promised numerical claim
(, , , , ,
, and the reading ) is preserved. The explicit
line-pencil description of is recorded as the classical geometric
picture rather than as a consumed claim, with its would-be supplier named
above.
The current Arithmetic genus of a plane curve gives the arithmetic genus; smoothness identifies it with the curve genus. The current A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line supplies the isomorphism, and the published projective-space cohomology result Global sections of projective twists supplies the section dimension. The proof transports cohomology through the isomorphism using the current cohomology and Riemann-Roch interfaces cited below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current plane-genus, rational-point and cohomology suppliers; a field of characteristic not two, a smooth plane conic curve with arithmetic genus computed by the plane-curve theorem, and a -rational point .
Divisors and degree: is a group homomorphism, and a -rational point has residue degree one, so (Degree divisor proper curve).
Plane conic arithmetic genus: a curve cut out by a nonzero homogeneous form of degree has and ; for this is , and for a smooth curve the arithmetic genus is the genus (Arithmetic genus of a plane curve, Curves over a field; the genus is the one of Genus via the Euler characteristic, where the agreement with the arithmetic genus in the smooth case is recorded).
Rational-point theorem: a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over that admits a divisor of degree one is isomorphic to (A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line).
Cohomology of the twists on the projective line: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; for a -rational point the degree-one divisor is linearly equivalent to , so with , while has dimension ; hence (Global sections of projective twists, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
Riemann-Roch and the index of speciality: with ; if and only if is nonspecial, equivalently if and only if the identity is an equality (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, The index of speciality i(D), Special and nonspecial divisors, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).
Invariance under isomorphism: and are dimensions of cohomology groups of the attached invertible sheaf, so an isomorphism of curves carrying to a divisor carries to and preserves and (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections, The index of speciality i(D)).
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the rational-point and Riemann-Roch suppliers above; the computation evaluates the given conic, point and isomorphism and selects nothing beyond them (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Degree one and genus zero. By [F1] the divisor has degree because is -rational. By [F2] the plane conic has , and since is smooth, .
The conic is a projective line. The curve is smooth proper and geometrically integral by hypothesis and has genus by step 1.1, and it carries the degree-one divisor of step 1.1; [F3] therefore gives a -isomorphism .
The two-dimensional space of the point. Under the isomorphism of step 2.1 the degree-one divisor corresponds to a degree-one divisor of , and by [F4] with and ; Riemann-Roch [F5] on at therefore reads , so . By the invariance [F6] of and under isomorphism, and . Equivalently, contains the constants and a coordinate function with a single simple pole at , so its dimension is at least two, while [F5] gives and the value forces .
Riemann-Roch on the conic and conclusion. Riemann-Roch on at the degree-one divisor reads , which with of step 3.1 is the identity ; by [F5] the divisor is nonspecial, and the equality case of the Riemann inequality holds at a rational point of a genus-zero conic. The classical projection parametrisation of from realizes the pencil and the coordinate of the isomorphism; the example therefore exhibits explicitly the rational-point hypothesis of the genus-zero theorem in the conic case. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F7]; nothing is selected beyond the given conic, point and isomorphism.
A genus-zero curve need not be the projective line
Counterexample
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current smoothness, properness, plane-genus and rational-point suppliers.
Let and let be the real projective conic. Then:
- is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over . On each of the three standard affine charts, after permuting coordinates, the equation is . In its chart ring the Jacobian entries generate the unit ideal, since ; each prime therefore has a neighborhood on which one Jacobian minor is invertible, giving a standard smooth presentation. Thus all three charts are smooth over . The conic is a closed subscheme of the proper -scheme , hence proper. Over the form is irreducible: a factorisation into linear forms would, after setting , make the product of the restrictions of , so by unique factorisation in the restrictions are units times and . After rescaling and, if necessary, interchanging the factors, write and . Expanding gives Comparing with gives , , and . The first two equations force and , hence in characteristic zero, contradicting . Thus is irreducible over . The scheme is reduced and irreducible; it is nonempty since it contains . The field is an algebraic closure of , so this is the geometric fibre used to establish geometric integrality over ; since is algebraically closed, the same scheme is geometrically integral over . Its chain dimension, and that of over , are one by the direct affine-chart calculation in [F4].
- . By Arithmetic genus of a plane curve applied to the curve cut out by the degree-two form, the arithmetic genus is , and for a smooth curve the arithmetic genus is the genus (Genus via the Euler characteristic), so .
- has no -rational point. If with , then ; since is not a point of , the conic has no -point, .
- The hypothesis of A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line is not satisfied. For every closed point , its residue field is a finite extension of ; it is separable and simple, so an irreducible real minimal polynomial for a generator has degree or (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field, Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect, Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable, A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple, The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis and degree , An irreducible polynomial in has degree or ). Degree would make and give an -point by Field-valued points and local-ring points, contradicting item 3. Thus every closed point has degree . Every divisor, including a signed divisor with arbitrary integers , has degree , which is even (Degree divisor proper curve). In particular, no divisor has degree one, so the theorem's degree-one-divisor hypothesis fails.
- Geometrically the conic is a projective line. Over the point satisfies , so has a -rational point; is a smooth proper geometrically integral genus-zero curve over by items 1 and 2 applied over , and A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line therefore gives . Thus the same curve becomes a projective line after base change to .
- . The line has the -rational point , and an -isomorphism would induce a bijection on -rational points; since by item 3, no such isomorphism exists.
Over a non-algebraically-closed field, genus zero therefore does not determine the curve: the real conic is a projective line geometrically and a form of with no rational point arithmetically.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the
examples-page items ex-base-change-real-conic-to-complex and
ex-projective-conic-standard-charts; examples-page items are leaves and
cannot carry a load, and both uses are replaced here by the explicit
computations in items 1, 3, 5 and 6 ( and its partials, the sign of a sum of
squares over , the evaluation at , and the transport of
rational points along an isomorphism).
The current Arithmetic genus of a plane curve supplies the genus computation, and the current A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line is used only to state the missing rational-point hypothesis. The explicit smoothness, geometric-integrality, residue-degree, and real-point arguments below establish the counterexample directly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current smoothness, properness, plane-genus and rational-point suppliers; the field , the form , the closed subscheme , and its base change to .
Smoothness: for either or , each of the three standard affine charts of is presented as . Its Jacobian row is , and in one has . Thus no prime contains both entries; around every prime one of them is invertible, so the one-equation presentation is standard smooth there by Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps. By [F2] the structure map is proper, hence of finite type by Proper morphisms, so the finite-type hypothesis in Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations holds. Therefore every chart, and hence , is smooth over .
Properness: for either or , is proper over ; the closed immersion is proper, and its composition with the structure morphism is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Closed immersions are proper, Properness survives composition, Proper morphisms).
Geometric integrality: over the form has no factorisation into linear forms. Any proper factorisation of a homogeneous quadratic over a field has two degree-one factors; writing each as its degree-one homogeneous part plus a constant, the degree-zero and degree-one parts of their product force both constants to vanish. Thus it suffices to test homogeneous linear factors. If , then restricting to and using unique factorisation in lets us rescale and order the factors as and . Their product has , , and coefficients , , and , respectively. Equality with requires , , and ; the first two force in characteristic zero, contradicting the third. Thus is irreducible in ; its principal ideal is prime by the finite-variable UFD lemma, so is reduced and irreducible. It is nonempty since . The extension is algebraic ( has power basis and degree ) and is algebraically closed (The complex numbers are algebraically closed), so is an algebraic closure of (An algebraic closure of a field). Hence is the geometric fibre defining geometric integrality of over ; for over , take the algebraic closure to be itself. The fibres are integral in the sense of Geometric properties of fibres, giving the geometric-integrality assertions in Curves over a field (Geometric fibres and geometric points, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes).
Scheme chain dimension: for , the three standard affine charts of have coordinate ring (Relative projective space from standard charts). By [F3], is irreducible over and therefore over ; for either field its homogeneous ideal is prime by the UFD property of (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes). Each chart ring is the degree-zero subring of the localization of this homogeneous domain at one coordinate, hence is a nonzero domain. The map is injective: if a nonzero lay in , then in it would equal for nonzero , contradicting additivity of degree in (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials). Thus is transcendental over , while is algebraic over by ; the transcendence-degree tower formula gives (Transcendence degree is additive in finite towers). The affine-domain dimension theorem gives Krull dimension (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree). The ring is Noetherian as a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial ring, so its spectrum is Noetherian (Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators, The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space). Every nonempty irreducible closed subset of this spectrum has a prime ideal as its unique generic point, and distinct primes have distinct closures; thus chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets have exactly the lengths of chains of prime ideals. The chart's chain dimension is therefore its Krull dimension, one (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Each of the three charts is Noetherian. A descending chain of closed subsets of stabilizes after restriction to each chart; since the cover is finite, the maximum of those three stabilization indices works on all of . Thus is Noetherian, and the open-cover dimension lemma gives its chain dimension as the supremum of the three chart dimensions, namely one (Dimension can be computed on an open cover).
Arithmetic genus: a curve cut out by a nonzero homogeneous form of degree has ; for this is , and for a smooth curve (Arithmetic genus of a plane curve, Genus via the Euler characteristic).
Residue-field degrees: if is a closed point, an affine neighborhood of is of finite type over , and remains closed there, so is finite over (Curves over a field, A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field). The field is perfect because it has characteristic zero (Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect), so the finite extension is separable (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable) and simple (A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple). If , the minimal polynomial of is irreducible and has degree (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis and degree ); every irreducible real polynomial has degree or (An irreducible polynomial in has degree or ). If this degree were , then and the residue-field point would give an -morphism (Field-valued points and local-ring points).
No real points and even divisor degrees: every real sum of squares vanishes only at the origin, so . Therefore [F6] excludes residue degree for every closed point, and every closed point has residue degree . A divisor is a finite signed combination of closed points and has degree (Degree divisor proper curve, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme); hence is even.
The rational-point theorem: a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over a field that admits a divisor of degree one (equivalently a -rational closed point) is isomorphic to (A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line); and an isomorphism of -schemes induces a bijection of -rational points, while has the -point .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the local-standard-smooth definition used in [F1], in the three properness results used in [F2], in the Noetherian-spectrum and irreducible-closed-subset correspondences used in [F4], and in the genus-zero rational-point theorem [F8]; the arithmetic-genus route in [F5] also inherits the properness suppliers. The factorisation, chart-dimension computations, and residue-field degree argument require no further choice principle, and the algebraic closure used here is the explicitly given (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The conic is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve. By [F1], for each , the Jacobian row on each of the three charts has a unit entry in a neighborhood of every prime; the standard smooth presentation criterion gives smoothness at every point. In particular is smooth over . By [F2], is proper over ; by [F3], the algebraic-closure fibre is integral, so is geometrically integral over ; and [F4] directly computes chain dimension one for both and . Therefore is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over .
No rational point, hence no degree-one divisor. Every real solution of is , which is not a point of , so . By [F6] every closed point has residue degree either or , and degree would give a real point; hence every closed point has degree . For any signed divisor , [F7] gives , an even integer. Thus no divisor has degree one and the hypothesis of [F8] fails.
Genus zero. Applying [F5] to the curve cut out by the degree-two form gives , and since is smooth the arithmetic genus equals the genus, so .
The complex picture. Over the point satisfies , so has a -rational point; by steps 1.1 and 2.1 applied over (with [F1]–[F5] read over the algebraically closed field of characteristic ), is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and [F8] gives .
The two curves are not isomorphic over . The line has the -rational point , while has none by step 1.2; an -isomorphism would induce a bijection on -rational points (an isomorphism of functors of points), so . Hence a genus-zero curve over a non-algebraically-closed field need not be a projective line, and the rational-point hypothesis of [F8] cannot be dropped; geometrically the conic is a projective line, so genus zero does not determine the curve arithmetically. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F9]; nothing is selected.
The jump l(D+p) - l(D) ranges from zero to the residue degree
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, residue-field and projective-line suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over (Curves over a field), let be a divisor and let be a closed point. By Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor the quotient embeds -linearly into the residue field , so the jump is bounded: and both extremes occur. The intermediate values occur as well: the jump need not be or , as case (iv) below shows in residue degree two.
On , with coordinate and point at infinity (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree):
- for and with and rational, both and have negative degree, so and the jump is ;
- for and with rational, while is the one-dimensional space spanned by , whose divisor is , so the jump is ;
- over , for and of residue degree two, is the constant field with , while is linearly equivalent to because , so and is three-dimensional: the jump is ;
- over , for and , one has and is the one-dimensional space spanned by , so the jump is inside residue degree .
The residue-degree case therefore really occurs, the bound is sharp in both extremes, and the jump is in general an intermediate integer of the interval .
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement claimed that "the jump is either or ". That strengthening is false: case (iv) exhibits a jump of with residue degree . The statement above keeps every promised instance (i)-(iii) with their computations, corrects the general claim to the true bound of Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor, and adds case (iv) as the disproof of the false reading. The scaffold's parenthetical in (ii), "a function with divisor ", is also corrected: the spanning function has divisor .
The current Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor supplies the general residue-field bound. The current Riemann-Roch-space, principal-divisor, Cartier-sheaf, and Cartier-to-Weil interfaces used for the displayed projective-line calculations are The space L(D), Principal weil divisor and class group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and The Picard group of the projective line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, residue-field and projective-line suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve , a divisor , a closed point , and the computations on listed in the statement.
On with coordinate : is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; for a monic irreducible of degree the closed point has and ; and with ; every divisor on is linearly equivalent to (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Twisting sheaf on Proj).
Every nonzero factors as a unit times a product of monic irreducibles (For every field , is a unique factorisation domain); for a monic irreducible the point is a closed point of with residue degree and , for every other closed point of , and (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Order codimension one rational function).
The order at a closed point is a group homomorphism with , ; exactly for , and exactly for units. The local ring is a discrete valuation ring with uniformizer and residue field , and (Order codimension one rational function, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme, Degree divisor proper curve).
The current The space L(D) gives the order description of and its global-section identification; Principal weil divisor and class group gives the additive divisor convention. The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and The Picard group of the projective line identify the attached sheaves, including in case (3).
The general bound is Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor: , the quotient embeds -linearly into , whence , and the spaces are finite-dimensional with (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Finite-dimensionality of the Riemann-Roch space, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers of [F1]-[F5], exactly those recorded there; the explicit computations below select only the normalized spanning functions exhibited (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Set-up. By [F5] one has and for every divisor and closed point on ; by [F4] a rational function lies in if and only if for every closed point , where is the coefficient of . On every nonzero rational function is a quotient of nonzero polynomials (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, For every field , is a unique factorisation domain), and by [F2] and [F3] its orders are at every closed point, with for in lowest terms.
Case (1): , , , . A rational function in lowest terms lies in exactly when and for every : the second condition says has no poles at all, so is constant and is a polynomial, while the first says the polynomial has a zero of order at least at ; the condition at infinity forces , and then . Hence . The same argument with the single change , applied to , says is in only if with and divisible by at , which is impossible for a nonzero polynomial of degree at most one; hence and the jump is .
Case (2): , , . Here requires and for : again is a polynomial with a zero at , and forces , contradicting the zero at ; so . For the conditions are , and for all other : writing with , the condition at infinity is , so , and the condition at is ; hence and is the one-dimensional span of , a nonzero function with , , all other orders zero, so . The jump is , and for the rational point one has .
Case (3): , , . By [F1] the polynomial is monic irreducible of degree two with closed point of residue degree and , so is linearly equivalent to . The space consists of the rational functions with at every closed point: these are the polynomials (since the denominator of a reduced fraction would give a pole) with , i.e. the constants, so . For : a reduced fraction with all orders at least except possibly has or , so with , and the condition at infinity is , i.e. . Hence , spanned by , , : these three are linearly independent because clearing the denominator turns a relation into a polynomial identity of degree at most two. Therefore and the jump is , realized over the non-algebraically-closed field .
Case (4): , , . Here requires and for every : as in step 1.2 this forces to be a polynomial with , impossible for a nonzero polynomial, so . In the conditions are , and for all other : a reduced fraction with no pole outside is of the form with , and forces ; hence is the one-dimensional span of , whose orders are at and at , so the jump is while . This is the intermediate value: the jump is neither nor the full residue degree.
Assembly and choice accounting. Steps 1.2-2.1 exhibit jumps , and on , and in particular the extreme value occurs for in case (2) and for in case (3), while case (4) gives the intermediate value in residue degree ; the general inequality is [F5]. The sheaf restatement of case (3), , follows from the current Cartier/Picard route [F4]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1]-[F5], as recorded in [F6]; no infinite selection is made above, since the spanning functions are exhibited by formulas.
The Riemann inequality is not an equality for special divisors
Counterexample
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the Riemann--Roch, curve-divisor, Jacobian, weighted-Bezout, and projective-properness suppliers. Let be any field and let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus (Genus via the Euler characteristic). The zero divisor satisfies whereas the Riemann inequality gives only Thus the inequality is strict, with excess More generally, Riemann--Roch gives for every divisor , so equality with the lower bound holds exactly when , that is, exactly when is nonspecial (Special and nonspecial divisors). In particular, every special divisor gives a strict inequality.
A concrete instance is the Fermat quartic over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Steps 1.2, 1.3, 2.3, and 3.1 verify scheme-theoretically that it is smooth, pure of dimension one, geometrically integral, and of genus three. Its zero divisor therefore has , , and the strict inequality .
Supplier status. The Fermat geometry is proved below without using the generic complete-intersection existence claim. The genus formula and the Riemann--Roch, degree, and divisor interfaces cited below are draft suppliers in this run; this repair does not certify their separate proofs.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Riemann--Roch, curve-divisor, Jacobian, weighted-Bezout, and projective-properness suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus , and the zero divisor on .
Riemann--Roch as minus the index of speciality gives, for every divisor , Thus equality in the Riemann inequality holds exactly when , which is the definition of nonspeciality. (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Special and nonspecial divisors)
The zero divisor has , since the global sections of the structure sheaf on a proper integral curve are canonically . (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Functions on a proper curve)
The index of speciality of the zero divisor is . (The index of speciality i(D), Genus via the Euler characteristic)
The zero divisor has degree zero, and divisor degree is the additive weighted sum of closed-point coefficients. (Degree divisor proper curve)
In an affine plane chart, the smoothness criterion for a scheme presented by the actual equation is given by an invertible Jacobian minor. At a rational closed point, regularity of its local ring is equivalent to Jacobian rank , even if the actual ideal is not radical. (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Jacobian rank detects regularity at closed points)
In the Fermat calculation, is algebraically closed. For a nonzero nonunit equation in a chart ring , all irreducible components of the hypersurface have dimension one: each minimal prime over has height one by the principal ideal theorem, and the affine-domain dimension formula gives quotient dimension one. At a closed point with maximal ideal , its residue field is finite over and hence equals ; the dimension formula gives . A minimal prime over in this local ring is nonzero and has height one by the principal ideal theorem. No prime can lie strictly between it and , since that would give a chain of length at least three in a ring of dimension two. Therefore the hypersurface local ring has dimension one. The polynomial ring is Noetherian. The same minimal-prime calculation gives dimension one for every nonempty affine chart component. Every projective irreducible component meets a standard chart, and its intersection is a chart component, so every projective component has dimension one; the open-cover dimension lemma gives scheme dimension one as well. (Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators, The dimension formula for affine domains, Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree, Krull's principal ideal theorem, Dimension can be computed on an open cover, A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field)
The scheme-theoretic projective Bezout formula gives a nonempty finite intersection for coprime positive-degree forms and computes its local lengths; over an algebraically closed field the residue-degree weights are all one. (Algebraic Bezout formula as a sum of local scheme lengths)
A smooth finite-type scheme over an algebraically closed field has regular local rings. (Classical and scheme smoothness over a perfect field)
The published arithmetic-genus theorem gives for an integral plane curve cut out by a homogeneous form of degree (Arithmetic genus of a plane curve). For the smooth proper geometrically integral curve established in steps 1.2, 1.3, and 2.3, the current genus definition identifies (Genus via the Euler characteristic).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Riemann--Roch, curve and divisor, dimension and Jacobian, weighted-Bezout, and projective-properness suppliers used here. (The Axiom of Choice)
A finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, so every irreducible polynomial in it is prime. (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes)
Projective space over a field is proper; closed immersions and compositions of proper morphisms are proper. Hence a closed subscheme of is proper over . (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Closed immersions are proper, Properness survives composition)
Proof
Proof technique: compute the zero-divisor terms, prove the general strictness statement by rearranging Riemann--Roch, and realize the genus-three case by an explicit Fermat quartic.
The zero divisor is special. By [F3], , so it is nonzero; hence [F1] says that is special. By [F2], . [F1, F2, F3] 1.2 (Smoothness of the Fermat quartic.) Let be algebraically closed of characteristic zero, set , and let . In the chart , set and write the other coordinates as ; the equation is . The opens and cover this affine hypersurface, since no prime containing both and can contain . On , the derivative is a unit; on , is a unit. Each is therefore a standard smooth presentation by [F5], so the three projective charts show that is smooth over . The scheme is nonempty: choose with ; then . [F5, given] 1.3 (Scheme dimension.) In each of the three standard charts, identified by projective hypersurface affine pieces, the coordinate ring is with , a nonzero nonunit. The polynomial ring is Noetherian. Every minimal prime over is nonzero and has height one by [F6] and the principal ideal theorem. The dimension formula gives , and affine-domain dimension equals this transcendence degree. Thus every irreducible component in every nonempty chart has dimension one. Since the standard charts cover , it is pure of dimension one; the same calculation at a closed point gives local dimension one. The scheme is proper because it is the closed subscheme : projective space is proper over , and the closed immersion and composite are proper by [F12]. [F6, F12, given] 2.1 The inequality at is strict. By [F1] and [F4], Using step 1.1 gives because , and the excess is [F1, F4, step 1.1] 2.2 For any divisor , rearranging [F1] gives Since , the Riemann inequality is strict exactly when , which is exactly when is special; equality holds exactly for nonspecial divisors. This proves the general claim independently of the concrete example. [F1, step 1.1] 2.3 (Integrality.) We show that is square-free and irreducible. Suppose an irreducible homogeneous factor occurs at least twice. Choose a line not containing ; [F7] gives a closed point . On a chart through , the actual equation of lies in the square of the maximal ideal, so its Jacobian row is zero. The local ring has dimension one by step 1.3, and [F5] says it is not regular, contradicting smoothness from step 1.2 and [F8]. Hence is square-free. If the square-free were reducible, choose a nonconstant irreducible factor and let be the product of the remaining factors. Then are coprime and have positive degree. By [F7], they meet at a closed point . There lies in the square of the maximal ideal, so the Jacobian row again vanishes. The local ring has dimension one, contradicting regularity exactly as above. Thus is irreducible. Since is a UFD by [F11], is prime, and is integral. As is algebraically closed, this proves geometric integrality. [F5, F6, F7, F8, step 1.2, step 1.3] 3.1 (Genus three.) Steps 1.2, 1.3, and 2.3 show that is a smooth proper geometrically integral plane curve cut out by a homogeneous quartic. The arithmetic-genus theorem in [F9] gives , and the genus definition in [F9] identifies for this smooth curve. Hence , as needed for the concrete instance in the Counterexample section. [F9, step 1.2, step 1.3, step 2.3] 4.1 (Conclusion and choice accounting.) Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that the zero divisor on any curve of genus at least one gives a strict Riemann inequality with excess exactly . Step 2.2 proves the stated criterion for all divisors. Steps 1.2, 1.3, 2.3, and 3.1 give the promised characteristic-zero genus-three example, where the inequality is . The Axiom of Choice [F10] is inherited through the Riemann--Roch, affine-dimension, Jacobian, and Bezout suppliers; no additional choice is made.
A principal divisor of degree zero on the projective line
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor and projective-line cohomology suppliers.
Let be a field and let have coordinate on the standard chart , with point at infinity (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree). Let be distinct -rational points of , so and the associated closed points are and . The rational function has divisor which is a principal divisor of degree . Its divisor class satisfies the degree shift and Riemann-Roch numerically: the attached invertible sheaf is isomorphic to , since the class of a principal divisor is trivial and since on forces the class to be trivial under the isomorphism (The Picard group of the projective line). Hence by the explicit cohomology of the structure sheaf (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists). Alternatively is the one-dimensional -space spanned by because for a nonzero is equivalent to , and a rational function on with no poles is constant. In particular : the divisor is not effective, so the nonzero elements of are the scalar multiples of and not those of . Hence with , and Riemann-Roch reads on both sides, the right-hand side being with (Riemann-Roch as l minus i). The same computation for a monic polynomial of degree gives where is the factorisation of into monic irreducibles of degree and ; this divisor has degree , showing that the individual zero and pole parts need not be trivial even though the class is principal.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement claimed that "alternatively consists of the scalar multiples of because forces to have no poles". That is false as written: the condition is equivalent to , hence to , so consists of the scalar multiples of , and itself is not in because is not effective. The statement above keeps every other promised claim and records the corrected spanning function; the general degree-zero claim is , computed directly below.
The current principal-divisor, Cartier/Picard, and line-bundle interfaces used below are Principal weil divisor and class group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve. The degree zero asserted for this example is computed explicitly from ; no general principal-divisor degree theorem is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor and projective-line cohomology suppliers; a field , the projective line with chart , coordinate and point at infinity ; distinct -rational points , with closed points and ; and the rational function .
Projective-line data: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus ; for every monic irreducible of degree the closed point of has and ; every divisor on is linearly equivalent to , and the degree homomorphism from to is an isomorphism (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
Divisors and orders: a divisor on a curve is a finite formal -linear combination of closed points, with effectiveness read coefficientwise; for a closed point of a smooth curve the order at is a homomorphism on , so , and exactly when is regular at (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Order codimension one rational function).
Degree: the -degree of a divisor is , a group homomorphism ; for a rational point one has (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
The Riemann-Roch space: for a divisor on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, is the -subspace of functions whose poles are no worse than , membership being read coefficientwise as at every closed point , and the divisor of a rational function is (The space L(D)).
The integer is the dimension of the Riemann-Roch space, with ; in particular for the zero divisor (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The space L(D)).
The polynomial ring over a field is a unique factorisation domain (For every field , is a unique factorisation domain).
Sections of the structure sheaf: for the twisting sheaf of , and , so (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Global sections of projective twists).
Top cohomology vanishes: , so (Top cohomology of projective twists).
Riemann-Roch: for every divisor on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus one has with (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).
Degree shift of the Euler characteristic: for every divisor , where (Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift).
The Picard group of the projective line is : the degree homomorphism induces an isomorphism , so an invertible sheaf of degree zero is isomorphic to (The Picard group of the projective line).
The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor attaches the sheaf to a Cartier divisor; Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves gives its tensor and dual identities; On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group identifies principal divisors with the trivial line-bundle class; Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve identifies Cartier and Weil divisors on this smooth curve; and Principal weil divisor and class group supplies the principal-divisor convention. These interfaces give and the displayed tensor expression. The degree zero in this example is computed directly from .
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers named above; the computations below select nothing beyond the given points and functions (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
The two rational points and the divisors of , . The polynomials and are monic of degree , hence irreducible in : a factorisation into non-units would give two factors of degree at least one, whose degrees add to . So both are monic irreducibles of degree , and by [F1] applied to and to , with . Since , the maximal ideals are distinct, so and .
The divisor of . The order at a closed point is additive in products and quotients [F2], so for every closed point , . Summing against as in [F4] and using step 1.1, This is a principal divisor by construction — it is the divisor of the nonzero rational function — and its degree is by [F3] and step 1.1. In particular the zero part and the pole part are individually nontrivial while the total degree vanishes.
A general monic polynomial. Let be monic of degree . By [F6] it factors as with pairwise distinct monic irreducibles of degree and exponents , where . Setting and , additivity [F2] and the divisor formula of [F1] give a principal divisor; its degree is by [F3] and the residue-degree formula of [F1]. For the zero part and the pole part are both nonzero, while because their difference is the principal divisor ; for the polynomial is and , which is the case and of the formula. Taking recovers of step 1.1.
The triviality of the class and the sheaf. Since is principal, its class in is zero, and the degree isomorphism of [F1] is injective, so the class of a degree-zero divisor is trivial: by step 2.1. By the current Cartier/Picard dictionary [F12], the principal-divisor case of the sheaf attachment gives , and the tensor identities give ; the same conclusion via degrees uses [F11], under which a degree-zero invertible sheaf on is isomorphic to .
The sections of , directly. Let . By [F4], if and only if at every closed point , which by the additivity of [F2] is the same as at every closed point , that is by [F4]. So if and only if , and the space is the constant field : a nonzero rational function factors by [F6] as with , pairwise distinct monic irreducibles of degree and exponents , so that by [F1] and the additivity of the orders [F2]; effectivity forces for every (from the coefficient at ) and (from the coefficient at ), and since while this gives for all and . Hence if and only if for some , i.e. , a one-dimensional space spanned by , and by [F5]. In particular : the function corresponds to , and directly has coefficient at , so it is not effective.
The cohomological reading. By step 3.1, ; by [F7] the structure sheaf has , and by [F8] it has . Therefore and , in agreement with the direct computation of step 3.2; here and are the dimensions attached to and its sheaf [F5], the sheaf-theoretic equality being the current dictionary [F12].
Riemann-Roch and the Euler characteristic. The Euler characteristics are and, by step 4.1, , so as the degree shift [F10] requires for the degree-zero divisor : by step 2.1. Riemann-Roch [F9] reads the genus of the projective line being by [F1] and the degree being computed in step 2.1.
Assembly and the current supplier route. Step 2.1 computes of degree zero, step 3.1 identifies the divisor class as trivial and the attached sheaf as , steps 3.2 and 4.1 compute and , step 5.1 reads the degree shift and Riemann-Roch as , and step 2.2 gives for every monic polynomial of degree . The sheaf identifications of steps 3.1 and 4.1 use the current interfaces [F12]; the degree-zero claim is computed explicitly in step 2.1, and the direct divisor calculations of steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.2 use the current order route. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F13]: the functions , and the factorisations are exhibited by formulas, and no family of objects is selected.
A pencil of functions with poles at one point defines a finite map to the projective line
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current bounded-pole, linear-system and finite-map suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over , and let be a nonconstant rational function whose poles all lie at a single closed point , of order ; thus is the pole divisor of , and for every — the case "all poles at , of order at most " of the scaffold. Write . Then:
- and are linearly independent elements of for every , hence also of .
- In the space the subspace is two-dimensional and base-point-free: the section of has unit coefficient in a local trivialization at , and has unit coefficient at every point away from . The morphism attached to by A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space is exactly the finite morphism of A nonconstant rational function defines a finite map to the projective line, of degree and with fibre over infinity equal to the pole divisor .
- For the same two elements in the larger space are not base-point-free: since and , the point lies in both divisors, so is a base point. Among the divisors the base-point-free hypothesis therefore holds exactly at the pole divisor ().
- On the projective line, with coordinate and , the pair inside is base-point-free and the attached morphism is , the identity of : it is finite of degree one with fibre over infinity the single point . For the same pair inside has base point (the two divisors and both contain ), so no morphism is attached there; the identity is attached to the pole divisor .
- The morphism attached to a base-point-free subspace of depends on the subspace and not only on : on with the pencils and are both base-point-free subspaces of the same , and the attached morphisms satisfy and ; no fractional linear transformation satisfies , so the two morphisms are not related by the projective-linear action of on the target and are genuinely different.
- By Rational functions with poles bounded at one point, for every closed point of residue degree and every with a nonconstant of exactly this kind exists, so the construction is nonempty. The simplest instance is with , whose only pole is at infinity and for which is the identity; this realizes the construction of Finite morphisms from a curve to the projective line in the case where the only pole is at infinity.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold claimed that and span a base-point-free subspace of for a pole order "at most ", and that "the same two sections, viewed inside the larger space , define the same morphism". Both clauses are false when the pole order at is strictly smaller than , and false on for : in both and contain , so is a base point and the hypothesis of the base-point-free morphism theorem fails. The repair keeps every promised object — the two sections, the two-dimensional subspace, the identification of its morphism with , the projective-line identity at , and the dependence of the morphism on the chosen subspace rather than on alone — and states base-point-freeness at the correct divisor, the pole divisor ; the enlarged divisors are handled as the base-point case in item 3.
The current Rational functions with poles bounded at one point supplies the nonconstant function in the existence clause. The Riemann-Roch-space and base-point-free interfaces are The space L(D), Base points and base-point-free linear systems and A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space. The finite map and its pole fibre are supplied by A nonconstant rational function defines a finite map to the projective line and Finite morphisms from a curve to the projective line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current bounded-pole, linear-system and finite-map suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over , a nonconstant whose poles all lie at a single closed point , of order , an integer , and .
Curve, orders and pole divisors: closed points of have order functions on ; a divisor is a finite formal integral combination of closed points; the positive and negative parts of are and , and (Curves over a field, Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Divisor support positive negative parts).
The Riemann-Roch space: is a -subspace of , characterized coefficientwise by ; the promised section dictionary identifies and attaches to the section with , so that the ratio of two sections of is the rational function (The space L(D)).
Base points: a closed point is a base point of a subspace when every nonzero has in the support of , and is base-point-free when it has no base point; the base-point-free condition is exactly the surjectivity of the evaluation morphism of any basis (Base points and base-point-free linear systems).
The base-point-free morphism: a base-point-free subspace of dimension carries a -morphism , well defined up to the projective-linear action of on the target, with under which the coordinate sections pull back to the sections of (in particular for a chosen basis when ); conversely, a morphism together with an isomorphism has base-point-free span , and the morphism attached to the data is (A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space).
The morphism of a nonconstant function: a nonconstant defines a finite locally free -morphism with , of degree , whose fibre over infinity is the pole divisor ; and with one has (A nonconstant rational function defines a finite map to the projective line, Finite morphisms from a curve to the projective line).
The projective line: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus with affine coordinate , origin and point at infinity ; the coordinate section of satisfies and with , while (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Relative projective space from standard charts).
Existence of functions with a bounded single pole: for every closed point of residue degree and every with there is a nonconstant , every pole of which lies at with order at most (Rational functions with poles bounded at one point).
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers of [F2], [F4], [F5] and [F7]; the example selects nothing beyond the given curve, point and function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The two sections and their divisors. Since is nonconstant, and are linearly independent in ; since and for by [F2] (as and ), they span a two-dimensional subspace of and of . By [F1] the pole divisor of is with , and the divisor attached to and in is and .
The same divisor with two different subspaces. On let . The two subspaces and of the single space are two-dimensional. Both are base-point-free: by [F2] and [F6], and , and (as ), so in each pair the constant is a unit away from infinity and the second section is a unit at infinity; by [F3] there is no base point. By [F4] each subspace attaches a morphism , and the pullback of the coordinate is the ratio of the two basis sections: and . If the two morphisms were related by the projective-linear action of on the target, some would satisfy ; clearing denominators, , so comparing coefficients gives , then , then , contradicting that is invertible. Hence and are not related by the target action: the morphism attached to a base-point-free subspace of depends on the subspace, not only on .
Base-point-freeness at the pole divisor. Take and . By step 1.1, , which does not contain , so the section does not vanish at ; and is supported at , so the constant section does not vanish at any other point. By [F3] no point of lies in both divisors, so is base-point-free of dimension two.
The attached morphism is . By [F5] there is a finite locally free morphism with , of degree , whose fibre over infinity is , and an isomorphism . Under the section dictionary [F2] the pullbacks and correspond to the rational functions and , whose span is ; the converse clause of [F4], applied with , and that isomorphism, gives that is base-point-free — recovering step 2.1 — and that the morphism attached to the data is . Hence , so is finite of degree with fibre over infinity equal to .
The enlarged divisors have the base point . Let . By step 1.1 both and contain , since and ; by [F3] the point is a base point of , so the hypothesis of [F4] fails and no morphism is attached. Together with step 2.1 this shows that among the divisors the pair is base-point-free exactly at the pole divisor ().
The projective-line identity. Let and , so that by [F6] (the coordinate section has divisor ). By step 3.1 the attached morphism is , finite of degree with fibre over infinity the single point ; and the converse clause of [F4], applied with , and the isomorphism of [F6] carrying and (matching divisors and by [F2]), shows that the morphism attached to the data is the identity . For , the same two elements of have and , both containing , so by [F3] is a base point of and no morphism is attached to the larger system.
Realization and conclusion. By [F7] the example is nonempty: for every closed point of residue degree and every with there is a nonconstant with all poles at of order at most , and the construction above attaches to the pole divisor the base-point-free pencil with morphism exactly ; on the case is the simplest instance, in which the only pole is at infinity and is the identity. This realizes the construction of Finite morphisms from a curve to the projective line in the single-pole case. The Axiom of Choice declared in [F8] is inherited only through the suppliers of [F2], [F4], [F5] and [F7], and nothing is selected beyond the given curve, point and function.
A sufficiently positive divisor is nonspecial and Riemann-Roch counts its sections
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus (Curves over a field, Genus via the Euler characteristic), let be a finite -morphism, and let be an effective divisor on with . Let be any divisor on and let be an integer supplied for and by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem. Then for every and every effective divisor the divisor is nonspecial, (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial), so Riemann-Roch computes its dimension exactly: (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).
The concrete instance is the projective line. Take , and , so that ; then and, for every , while . Consequently:
- for the divisor is nonspecial, , and Riemann-Roch reads — including the boundary case , where (the sheaf has no sections);
- for the divisor is special, with and , and Riemann-Roch reads ;
- so in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for , and the exact threshold is the boundary value ; the general statement only provides some threshold depending on and on the fixed morphism, which this instance computes exactly.
The "sufficiently positive" threshold of the general statement is the fixed-direction one of the vanishing theorem; the example does not assert the universal bound " implies ", which requires Serre duality and belongs to the next pair.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the
examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d (on another page)
and ex-riemann-roch-projective-line-divisor (on this page) for the
projective-line values and the nonspecial range. Both are
examples and cannot carry a load; the citations are replaced by the published
A-page suppliers
Global sections of projective twists,
Top cohomology of projective twists and
Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, together with
The Picard group of the projective line for the identification
of the attached sheaves. Every
promised numerical claim is preserved: for ,
nonspeciality exactly for , the boundary case with
, and the fixed-direction restriction.
The current Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial supplies the fixed-direction vanishing, and Riemann-Roch as l minus i supplies the dimension identity. The current projective-line divisor and Picard interfaces Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line identify the attached twists; the published cohomology corollaries supply their dimensions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus , a finite -morphism , an effective divisor with , a divisor and an integer supplied by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem for ; and the instance , , , .
Fixed-direction nonspeciality: for every and every effective , the divisor is nonspecial, that is, ; the threshold depends on and on and is not a bound in the degree (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial, Special and nonspecial divisors).
Riemann-Roch and the index of speciality: with , and is nonspecial exactly when , equivalently when ; here and (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Genus via the Euler characteristic, The index of speciality i(D), The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).
Projective-line data: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; the point at infinity has residue degree ; the coordinate section vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so and with (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
The current The Picard group of the projective line identifies the degree class of every invertible sheaf on with a unique twist. Together with the divisor-to-line-bundle interface in Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, this gives for every .
Degree of a multiple: is a group homomorphism on divisors with for a closed point, so with [F3] one has (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve).
Cohomology of the twists of the projective line: for , for and for , while for and has dimension for ; with [F4] these are and (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D)).
Fixed direction only: the nonspeciality theorem is stated for the fixed ample direction ; it is explicitly not claimed there that every divisor of degree greater than is nonspecial, which requires the duality pair following this page (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial).
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6]; the computation evaluates the given data and selects nothing (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The general statement. By [F1], for and the divisor satisfies .
The projective-line instance and its sheaves. Let , and . By [F3] one has , so this is an instance of the general data. By [F4] the attached invertible sheaves satisfy for every ; the identifications use the current divisor/Picard interfaces of [F3] and [F4].
The degree. By [F5] and [F3] the residue degree of infinity is , so .
Riemann-Roch for . By [F2] the identity holds with ; by step 1.1 and is nonspecial, so .
The dimensions of the twists. By [F6] and step 1.2, is for and for , while is for and for . In particular exactly when .
Nonspeciality and Riemann-Roch on the projective line. Combine steps 2.2 and 1.3. If , then , so is nonspecial by [F2], and the identity of [F2] reads since by [F3]; at this is . If , then , so is special by [F2], while ; the identity of [F2] reads . Hence in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for , with the exact threshold, whereas the general theorem supplies only the threshold along the fixed direction.
Fixed-direction restriction and choice accounting. The general statement is the fixed-direction form of [F1]: it is a bound along the one ample direction , depending on and , and [F7] records that no universal bound is asserted here; that bound belongs to the duality pair following this page. The Axiom of Choice of [F8] is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6] (the fixed-direction vanishing theorem, the divisor–tensor dictionary and the cohomology of projective space), and the computation selects nothing beyond the given curve, morphism, divisor and integer .
A negative right-hand side does not contradict Riemann-Roch
Counterexample
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, cohomology and Riemann-Roch suppliers.
Let be a field, let be an integer, let be the projective line over with point at infinity and coordinate , and put . Then so Riemann-Roch on () reads for this is the identity . The explicitly refuted readings are:
- " for every divisor ": at one has while , and a negative integer is not the dimension of any -vector space;
- "there exist independent sections": for every the number is negative, so it cannot count sections, and indeed ;
- "the Riemann inequality produces sections": the inequality is vacuous for , since its right-hand side is negative.
There is no contradiction with the vanishing for (No sections in negative degree): that corollary asserts exactly the value computed here and is proved without the Riemann inequality, because its nonpositive lower bound cannot ensure a nonzero section. The Euler characteristic is an integer that may be negative, and the compensation is supplied by , whose dimension is not zero as soon as ; the right-hand side of Riemann-Roch is therefore not itself the dimension of a space of sections. At the boundary , where and , the first two numerical readings are consistent. The third reading still fails: the bound does not ensure a nonzero section. Thus is the first failure of the first two readings and the first negative right-hand side; the third reading fails already at .
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement cited
the examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d for the
cohomology of the twists, and it also cited the same-page example
ex-riemann-roch-projective-line-divisor. Both are examples-page items: the
first is homed on the examples page
cohomology-of-quasi-coherent-sheaves-on-affine-and-projective-schemes-examples,
and an examples-page item may not be consumed by another item, while the
second is an example on this very page and likewise cannot carry the load. The
two citations are replaced here by the published A-page corollaries
Global sections of projective twists and
Top cohomology of projective twists (the same values at , with
the monomial count for and the rank for
) together with the A-page suppliers
Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and
The Picard group of the projective line; every promised claim is preserved.
The current divisor-to-line-bundle route uses Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line, while The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D) and The index of speciality i(D) identify the two cohomology dimensions. The published projective-line cohomology corollaries give their explicit values.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, cohomology and Riemann-Roch suppliers; a field , an integer , the projective line with point at infinity and coordinate , and the divisor .
Projective-line data: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over (Curves over a field) of genus ; the point at infinity has residue degree ; the coordinate section of vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so and with ; and every divisor on is linearly equivalent to , the degree homomorphism on divisor classes being an isomorphism (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
Picard group: the degree homomorphism induces an isomorphism under which the class of corresponds to , so every invertible sheaf on is isomorphic to for a unique integer (The Picard group of the projective line).
Divisors and degree: a divisor on a smooth proper curve is a finite formal -linear combination of closed points, and is a group homomorphism on the divisor group (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Degree divisor proper curve).
Dimensions: and are nonnegative integers, and a dimension over a field is nonnegative by definition (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D), Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
Riemann-Roch: for every divisor on the curve one has with and , with equality exactly when (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).
Negative degree: if then and , by the effective-divisor argument; the Riemann inequality is not used, since its right-hand side is nonpositive and cannot ensure a nonzero section (No sections in negative degree).
Explicit cohomology of the twists at : for , with monomial basis () of size , and for ; for and is free of rank for when (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists).
Riemann inequality: for every divisor (The Riemann inequality).
Riemann inequality vacuity and speciality: the inequality is an equality exactly when , so for the divisor is special and the inequality is strict (The index of speciality i(D)).
The current Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line identify the divisor class and attached twist, while The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D) and The index of speciality i(D) identify the cohomology dimensions. These interfaces give and the readings , used at steps 1.1 and 2.1.
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the cohomology, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers recorded above; the computation below evaluates explicit formulas at the given divisor and selects nothing (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The divisor and its degree; the attached sheaf. By [F1] the residue degree of infinity is , so by [F3] the degree of is . Still by [F1], , and by the current divisor/Picard route [F10] dualizing and tensoring give ; equivalently, both classes equal under the isomorphism of [F2] with .
Sections and index of speciality of . By [F7] with : the group vanishes because , and vanishes for (as ) while for it is free of rank ; thus and for every . By the isomorphism of step 1.1 and the definitions [F4] of and , Independently [F6] gives directly from of step 1.1, so the two computations of agree.
Riemann-Roch at . By [F5] applied to the divisor of step 1.1, with from [F1] and the values of step 2.1, an identity for every ; at it reads . The right-hand side is negative exactly when , and equals at the boundary .
The refuted readings and the role of . For every step 2.1 gives while ; since a dimension over is nonnegative ([F4]), the equality fails, and the negative number cannot be the number of independent sections in . The Riemann inequality [F8] reads , which is true for but vacuous: its right-hand side is negative, so it guarantees no nonzero section, in agreement with . The discrepancy is exactly the index of speciality: by step 2.1, for , so by [F9] is special, the Riemann inequality is strict, and the term supplies the negative compensation. For one has , and , so the first two numerical readings hold, but still ensures no nonzero section. The third reading therefore fails already at , while the first two fail first at , explicitly by with , and .
Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 1.1 computes and identifies the attached sheaf with ; step 2.1 computes and ; step 3.1 verifies the Riemann-Roch identity ; and step 3.2 exhibits the failure of the readings "" and "there exist sections" for every , first at where the right-hand side is , while the negative-degree vanishing of [F6] remains consistent because the term compensates. No contradiction with the Riemann inequality arises: the inequality gives no positive lower bound in this family: it is at and with negative right-hand side for . The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F11]; the computation selects nothing beyond the given field and integer .
The empty divisor, its Euler characteristic and the genus boundary cases
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current cohomology, dimension and Riemann-Roch suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus (Genus via the Euler characteristic), and let be the empty divisor. Then so the Euler characteristic of the structure sheaf is and Riemann-Roch on the empty divisor reads the normalization that makes the definition of the genus. The complete linear system consists of the single divisor in every genus, so . The two boundary genera: for one has with , so the empty divisor is nonspecial — for this reads , — while for one has with , the first and simplest case of a divisor of degree zero that is special, where the Riemann inequality for is the strict bound with gap . In genus zero the equality case holds at , and it fails at as soon as .
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the
examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d for the
projective-line values , . Examples-page
items are leaves and cannot carry a load; the citation is replaced by the
published A-page corollaries
Global sections of projective twists and
Top cohomology of projective twists together with
Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, which give the same
values at and . Every promised claim is preserved.
The current Riemann-Roch as l minus i supplies the Riemann-Roch identity, The dimension of a complete linear system supplies the dimension formula for , and Complete linear system identifies the linear system. The current structure-sheaf and cohomology suppliers give the empty divisor and genus boundary values.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current cohomology, dimension and Riemann-Roch suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus , and the empty divisor on .
The structure sheaf: the canonical map is an isomorphism, so ; in particular the zero divisor has a one-dimensional space of sections, spanned by the constant function (Functions on a proper curve, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).
The index of speciality and the genus: , the genus, which is the dimension of of the structure sheaf (The index of speciality i(D), Genus via the Euler characteristic, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).
Euler characteristic: , the Euler characteristic of the coherent sheaf (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Genus via the Euler characteristic).
Riemann-Roch: for every divisor one has , with and equality exactly when ; a divisor is nonspecial exactly when , and special exactly when (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Special and nonspecial divisors).
The complete linear system of the empty divisor: is a single point, and for every genus; generally is nonempty exactly when (The dimension of a complete linear system, Complete linear system, Divisors on a smooth proper curve).
The projective line: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; for its twists satisfy and (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists).
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the cohomology, degree and Riemann-Roch suppliers recorded above; the computation below evaluates the fixed divisor and selects nothing (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The dimensions at the empty divisor. By [F1] the space is one-dimensional, spanned by the constants, so ; by [F2] the index of speciality is .
Euler characteristic and Riemann-Roch at the empty divisor. By [F3] the Euler characteristic is , and the Riemann-Roch identity [F4] at , with because the empty divisor has empty support, reads , that is, : the genus is exactly the normalization constant that makes this identity hold.
The complete linear system of the empty divisor. By [F5] the complete linear system consists of the single divisor , so by step 1.1, in every genus.
The genus boundary cases. If , then step 1.1 gives , so by [F4] the empty divisor is nonspecial, by step 2.1, and the identity is an equality; the projective line realizes this with , by [F6]. If , then step 1.1 gives , so the empty divisor is special by [F4], by step 2.1, and the Riemann inequality for reads ; it is strict with gap exactly . In genus zero the equality case holds at , and for every it fails at by step 1.1 and [F4].
Conclusion and choice accounting. The empty divisor has , and Euler characteristic , Riemann-Roch at is the identity , and with ; the empty divisor is nonspecial exactly in genus zero and is the simplest special divisor in genus one. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F7]; nothing is selected.
Sources
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy), Chs. 8 and 6
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025), Ch. 18.5 and Ch. 21
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV)
- Michael Artin, MIT 18.721 Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (July 20, 2020 notes), Ch. 8
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025), Chs. 18.5 and 21