How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The jump l(D+p) - l(D) ranges from zero to the residue degree
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, residue-field and projective-line suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over (Curves over a field), let be a divisor and let be a closed point. By Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor the quotient embeds -linearly into the residue field , so the jump is bounded: and both extremes occur. The intermediate values occur as well: the jump need not be or , as case (iv) below shows in residue degree two.
On , with coordinate and point at infinity (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree):
- for and with and rational, both and have negative degree, so and the jump is ;
- for and with rational, while is the one-dimensional space spanned by , whose divisor is , so the jump is ;
- over , for and of residue degree two, is the constant field with , while is linearly equivalent to because , so and is three-dimensional: the jump is ;
- over , for and , one has and is the one-dimensional space spanned by , so the jump is inside residue degree .
The residue-degree case therefore really occurs, the bound is sharp in both extremes, and the jump is in general an intermediate integer of the interval .
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold statement claimed that "the jump is either or ". That strengthening is false: case (iv) exhibits a jump of with residue degree . The statement above keeps every promised instance (i)-(iii) with their computations, corrects the general claim to the true bound of Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor, and adds case (iv) as the disproof of the false reading. The scaffold's parenthetical in (ii), "a function with divisor ", is also corrected: the spanning function has divisor .
The current Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor supplies the general residue-field bound. The current Riemann-Roch-space, principal-divisor, Cartier-sheaf, and Cartier-to-Weil interfaces used for the displayed projective-line calculations are The space L(D), Principal weil divisor and class group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and The Picard group of the projective line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current divisor, residue-field and projective-line suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve , a divisor , a closed point , and the computations on listed in the statement.
On with coordinate : is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; for a monic irreducible of degree the closed point has and ; and with ; every divisor on is linearly equivalent to (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Twisting sheaf on Proj).
Every nonzero factors as a unit times a product of monic irreducibles (For every field , is a unique factorisation domain); for a monic irreducible the point is a closed point of with residue degree and , for every other closed point of , and (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Order codimension one rational function).
The order at a closed point is a group homomorphism with , ; exactly for , and exactly for units. The local ring is a discrete valuation ring with uniformizer and residue field , and (Order codimension one rational function, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme, Degree divisor proper curve).
The current The space L(D) gives the order description of and its global-section identification; Principal weil divisor and class group gives the additive divisor convention. The current Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group and The Picard group of the projective line identify the attached sheaves, including in case (3).
The general bound is Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor: , the quotient embeds -linearly into , whence , and the spaces are finite-dimensional with (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Finite-dimensionality of the Riemann-Roch space, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).
The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers of [F1]-[F5], exactly those recorded there; the explicit computations below select only the normalized spanning functions exhibited (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Set-up. By [F5] one has and for every divisor and closed point on ; by [F4] a rational function lies in if and only if for every closed point , where is the coefficient of . On every nonzero rational function is a quotient of nonzero polynomials (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, For every field , is a unique factorisation domain), and by [F2] and [F3] its orders are at every closed point, with for in lowest terms.
Case (1): , , , . A rational function in lowest terms lies in exactly when and for every : the second condition says has no poles at all, so is constant and is a polynomial, while the first says the polynomial has a zero of order at least at ; the condition at infinity forces , and then . Hence . The same argument with the single change , applied to , says is in only if with and divisible by at , which is impossible for a nonzero polynomial of degree at most one; hence and the jump is .
Case (2): , , . Here requires and for : again is a polynomial with a zero at , and forces , contradicting the zero at ; so . For the conditions are , and for all other : writing with , the condition at infinity is , so , and the condition at is ; hence and is the one-dimensional span of , a nonzero function with , , all other orders zero, so . The jump is , and for the rational point one has .
Case (3): , , . By [F1] the polynomial is monic irreducible of degree two with closed point of residue degree and , so is linearly equivalent to . The space consists of the rational functions with at every closed point: these are the polynomials (since the denominator of a reduced fraction would give a pole) with , i.e. the constants, so . For : a reduced fraction with all orders at least except possibly has or , so with , and the condition at infinity is , i.e. . Hence , spanned by , , : these three are linearly independent because clearing the denominator turns a relation into a polynomial identity of degree at most two. Therefore and the jump is , realized over the non-algebraically-closed field .
Case (4): , , . Here requires and for every : as in step 1.2 this forces to be a polynomial with , impossible for a nonzero polynomial, so . In the conditions are , and for all other : a reduced fraction with no pole outside is of the form with , and forces ; hence is the one-dimensional span of , whose orders are at and at , so the jump is while . This is the intermediate value: the jump is neither nor the full residue degree.
Assembly and choice accounting. Steps 1.2-2.1 exhibit jumps , and on , and in particular the extreme value occurs for in case (2) and for in case (3), while case (4) gives the intermediate value in residue degree ; the general inequality is [F5]. The sheaf restatement of case (3), , follows from the current Cartier/Picard route [F4]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1]-[F5], as recorded in [F6]; no infinite selection is made above, since the spanning functions are exhibited by formulas.
Depends on
- The Picard group of the projective line
- Curves over a field
- The Axiom of Choice
- Degree divisor proper curve
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Divisors on a smooth proper curve
- Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
- The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)
- Order codimension one rational function
- Principal weil divisor and class group
- The residue field at a point of an affine scheme
- The space L(D)
- Twisting sheaf on Proj
- Monotonicity of L(D) in the divisor
- Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree
- Finite-dimensionality of the Riemann-Roch space
- On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group
- Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve
- Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a unique factorisation domain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
140 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy), Chs. 8 and 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Artin, MIT 18.721 Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (July 20, 2020 notes), Ch. 8 (standard reference, not scraped)