Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A genus-zero curve need not be the projective line

Counterexample

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current smoothness, properness, plane-genus and rational-point suppliers.

Let k=R and let C=V+(x2+y2+z2)⊆PR2 be the real projective conic. Then:

  1. C is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over R. On each of the three standard affine charts, after permuting coordinates, the equation is 1+u2+v2=0. In its chart ring the Jacobian entries 2u,2v generate the unit ideal, since 1=(−u/2)(2u)+(−v/2)(2v); each prime therefore has a neighborhood on which one Jacobian minor is invertible, giving a standard smooth presentation. Thus all three charts are smooth over R. The conic is a closed subscheme of the proper R-scheme PR2, hence proper. Over C the form F is irreducible: a factorisation x2+y2+z2=L1L2 into linear forms would, after setting z=0, make x2+y2=(x+iy)(x−iy) the product of the restrictions of L1,L2, so by unique factorisation in C[x,y] the restrictions are units times x+iy and x−iy. After rescaling and, if necessary, interchanging the factors, write L1=x+iy+αz and L2=x−iy+γz. Expanding gives L1L2=x2+y2+(α+γ)xz+i(γ−α)yz+αγz2. Comparing with F gives α+γ=0, i(γ−α)=0, and αγ=1. The first two equations force γ=α and 2α=0, hence α=γ=0 in characteristic zero, contradicting αγ=1. Thus F is irreducible over C. The scheme CC=V+(F) is reduced and irreducible; it is nonempty since it contains [i:0:1]. The field C is an algebraic closure of R, so this is the geometric fibre used to establish geometric integrality over R; since C is algebraically closed, the same scheme is geometrically integral over C. Its chain dimension, and that of C over R, are one by the direct affine-chart calculation in [F4].
  2. g(C)=0. By Arithmetic genus of a plane curve applied to the curve C cut out by the degree-two form, the arithmetic genus is pa(C)=(2−1)(2−2)2=0, and for a smooth curve the arithmetic genus is the genus (Genus via the Euler characteristic), so g(C)=0.
  3. C has no R-rational point. If x,y,z∈R with x2+y2+z2=0, then x=y=z=0; since [0:0:0] is not a point of PR2, the conic has no R-point, C(R)=∅.
  4. The hypothesis of A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line is not satisfied. For every closed point p∈C, its residue field is a finite extension of R; it is separable and simple, so an irreducible real minimal polynomial for a generator has degree 1 or 2 (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field, Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect, Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable, A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple, The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis 1,a,…,an−1 and degree n, An irreducible polynomial in R[x] has degree 1 or 2). Degree 1 would make κ(p)=R and give an R-point by Field-valued points and local-ring points, contradicting item 3. Thus every closed point has degree 2. Every divisor, including a signed divisor D=∑pnp[p] with arbitrary integers np, has degree deg⁡RD=2∑pnp, which is even (Degree divisor proper curve). In particular, no divisor has degree one, so the theorem's degree-one-divisor hypothesis fails.
  5. Geometrically the conic is a projective line. Over C the point [i:0:1] satisfies i2+02+1=0, so CC has a C-rational point; CC is a smooth proper geometrically integral genus-zero curve over C by items 1 and 2 applied over C, and A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line therefore gives CC≅PC1. Thus the same curve becomes a projective line after base change to C.
  6. C≇PR1. The line PR1 has the R-rational point [1:0], and an R-isomorphism would induce a bijection on R-rational points; since C(R)=∅ by item 3, no such isomorphism exists.

Over a non-algebraically-closed field, genus zero therefore does not determine the curve: the real conic is a projective line geometrically and a form of P1 with no rational point arithmetically.

Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the examples-page items ex-base-change-real-conic-to-complex and ex-projective-conic-standard-charts; examples-page items are leaves and cannot carry a load, and both uses are replaced here by the explicit computations in items 1, 3, 5 and 6 (F and its partials, the sign of a sum of squares over R, the evaluation at [i:0:1], and the transport of rational points along an isomorphism).

The current Arithmetic genus of a plane curve supplies the genus computation, and the current A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line is used only to state the missing rational-point hypothesis. The explicit smoothness, geometric-integrality, residue-degree, and real-point arguments below establish the counterexample directly.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current smoothness, properness, plane-genus and rational-point suppliers; the field k=R, the form F=x2+y2+z2, the closed subscheme C=V+(F)⊆PR2, and its base change CC to C.

[F1]

Smoothness: for either K=R or K=C, each of the three standard affine charts of CK is presented as AK=K[u,v]/(1+u2+v2). Its Jacobian row is (2u,2v), and in AK one has 1=(−u/2)(2u)+(−v/2)(2v). Thus no prime contains both entries; around every prime one of them is invertible, so the one-equation presentation is standard smooth there by Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps. By [F2] the structure map CK→Spec⁡K is proper, hence of finite type by Proper morphisms, so the finite-type hypothesis in Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations holds. Therefore every chart, and hence CK, is smooth over K.

[F2]

Properness: for either K=R or K=C, PK2 is proper over K; the closed immersion CK↪PK2 is proper, and its composition with the structure morphism is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Closed immersions are proper, Properness survives composition, Proper morphisms).

[F3]

Geometric integrality: over C the form F has no factorisation into linear forms. Any proper factorisation of a homogeneous quadratic over a field has two degree-one factors; writing each as its degree-one homogeneous part plus a constant, the degree-zero and degree-one parts of their product force both constants to vanish. Thus it suffices to test homogeneous linear factors. If F=L1L2, then restricting to z=0 and using unique factorisation in C[x,y] lets us rescale and order the factors as L1=x+iy+αz and L2=x−iy+γz. Their product has xz, yz, and z2 coefficients α+γ, i(γ−α), and αγ, respectively. Equality with F requires α+γ=0, i(γ−α)=0, and αγ=1; the first two force α=γ=0 in characteristic zero, contradicting the third. Thus F is irreducible in C[x,y,z]; its principal ideal is prime by the finite-variable UFD lemma, so CC is reduced and irreducible. It is nonempty since [i:0:1]∈CC. The extension C/R is algebraic (C/R has power basis 1,i and degree 2) and C is algebraically closed (The complex numbers are algebraically closed), so C is an algebraic closure of R (An algebraic closure of a field). Hence CC is the geometric fibre defining geometric integrality of C over R; for CC over C, take the algebraic closure to be C itself. The fibres are integral in the sense of Geometric properties of fibres, giving the geometric-integrality assertions in Curves over a field (Geometric fibres and geometric points, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes).

[F4]

Scheme chain dimension: for K∈{R,C}, the three standard affine charts of CK have coordinate ring AK=K[u,v]/(1+u2+v2) (Relative projective space from standard charts). By [F3], F is irreducible over C and therefore over R; for either field K its homogeneous ideal is prime by the UFD property of K[x,y,z] (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes). Each chart ring is the degree-zero subring of the localization of this homogeneous domain at one coordinate, hence is a nonzero domain. The map K[u]→AK is injective: if a nonzero q(u) lay in (1+u2+v2), then in K[u][v] it would equal (1+u2+v2)h for nonzero h, contradicting additivity of degree in v (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials). Thus u is transcendental over K, while v is algebraic over K(u) by v2+u2+1=0; the transcendence-degree tower formula gives trdeg⁡KFrac⁡(AK)=1 (Transcendence degree is additive in finite towers). The affine-domain dimension theorem gives Krull dimension dim⁡AK=1 (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree). The ring AK is Noetherian as a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial ring, so its spectrum is Noetherian (Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are Noetherian by finite generators, The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space). Every nonempty irreducible closed subset of this spectrum has a prime ideal as its unique generic point, and distinct primes have distinct closures; thus chains of nonempty irreducible closed subsets have exactly the lengths of chains of prime ideals. The chart's chain dimension is therefore its Krull dimension, one (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Each of the three charts is Noetherian. A descending chain of closed subsets of CK stabilizes after restriction to each chart; since the cover is finite, the maximum of those three stabilization indices works on all of CK. Thus CK is Noetherian, and the open-cover dimension lemma gives its chain dimension as the supremum of the three chart dimensions, namely one (Dimension can be computed on an open cover).

[F5]

Arithmetic genus: a curve X=V+(G) cut out by a nonzero homogeneous form of degree d≥1 has pa(X)=(d−1)(d−2)2; for d=2 this is 0, and for a smooth curve pa=g (Arithmetic genus of a plane curve, Genus via the Euler characteristic).

[F6]

Residue-field degrees: if p is a closed point, an affine neighborhood Spec⁡A of p is of finite type over R, and p remains closed there, so κ(p)=A/mp is finite over R (Curves over a field, A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field). The field R is perfect because it has characteristic zero (Fields of characteristic zero, finite fields, and algebraically closed fields are perfect), so the finite extension κ(p)/R is separable (Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable) and simple (A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple). If κ(p)=R(α), the minimal polynomial of α is irreducible and has degree [κ(p):R] (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis 1,a,…,an−1 and degree n); every irreducible real polynomial has degree 1 or 2 (An irreducible polynomial in R[x] has degree 1 or 2). If this degree were 1, then κ(p)=R and the residue-field point would give an R-morphism Spec⁡R→C (Field-valued points and local-ring points).

[F7]

No real points and even divisor degrees: every real sum of squares x2+y2+z2 vanishes only at the origin, so C(R)=∅. Therefore [F6] excludes residue degree 1 for every closed point, and every closed point has residue degree 2. A divisor is a finite signed combination D=∑pnp[p] of closed points and has degree deg⁡RD=∑pnp[κ(p):R] (Degree divisor proper curve, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme); hence deg⁡RD=2∑pnp is even.

[F8]

The rational-point theorem: a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus 0 over a field K that admits a divisor of degree one (equivalently a K-rational closed point) is isomorphic to PK1 (A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line); and an isomorphism of K-schemes induces a bijection of K-rational points, while PK1 has the K-point [1:0].

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the local-standard-smooth definition used in [F1], in the three properness results used in [F2], in the Noetherian-spectrum and irreducible-closed-subset correspondences used in [F4], and in the genus-zero rational-point theorem [F8]; the arithmetic-genus route in [F5] also inherits the properness suppliers. The factorisation, chart-dimension computations, and residue-field degree argument require no further choice principle, and the algebraic closure used here is the explicitly given C (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · verify by explicit computation that the real conic is a smooth proper geometrically integral genus-zero curve with no real point, acquire a complex point after base change, and compare $\mathbb R$-points to separate it from $\mathbb P^1_{\mathbb R}$
1.1F1F2F3F4

The conic is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve. By [F1], for each K=R,C, the Jacobian row on each of the three charts has a unit entry in a neighborhood of every prime; the standard smooth presentation criterion gives smoothness at every point. In particular C is smooth over R. By [F2], C is proper over R; by [F3], the algebraic-closure fibre CC is integral, so C is geometrically integral over R; and [F4] directly computes chain dimension one for both C and CC. Therefore C is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over R.

1.2F6F7

No rational point, hence no degree-one divisor. Every real solution of x2+y2+z2=0 is (0,0,0), which is not a point of PR2, so C(R)=∅. By [F6] every closed point has residue degree either 1 or 2, and degree 1 would give a real point; hence every closed point has degree 2. For any signed divisor D=∑pnp[p], [F7] gives deg⁡RD=2∑pnp, an even integer. Thus no divisor has degree one and the hypothesis of [F8] fails.

2.1F5step 1.1

Genus zero. Applying [F5] to the curve C cut out by the degree-two form gives pa(C)=(2−1)(2−2)/2=0, and since C is smooth the arithmetic genus equals the genus, so g(C)=0.

3.1F1F2F3F4F5F8step 1.1step 2.1

The complex picture. Over C the point [i:0:1] satisfies i2+02+1=0, so CC has a C-rational point; by steps 1.1 and 2.1 applied over C (with [F1]–[F5] read over the algebraically closed field C of characteristic 0), CC is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus 0, and [F8] gives CC≅PC1.

4.1F8F9step 1.2step 3.1∎

The two curves are not isomorphic over R. The line PR1 has the R-rational point [1:0], while C has none by step 1.2; an R-isomorphism would induce a bijection on R-rational points (an isomorphism of functors of points), so C≇PR1. Hence a genus-zero curve over a non-algebraically-closed field need not be a projective line, and the rational-point hypothesis of [F8] cannot be dropped; geometrically the conic is a projective line, so genus zero does not determine the curve arithmetically. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the suppliers of [F9]; nothing is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

184 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources