Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:X→S be a morphism locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms) and let x∈X with s=f(x). Then f is smooth at x (Smooth morphism of schemes) if and only if there are affine open neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡C of x and V=Spec⁡A of s with f(U)⊆V and a presentation of Ch, for some h∈C∖q with q the prime of x, as Ch  ≅  (A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr))g, in which some r×r minor of the Jacobian matrix (∂fj/∂ti) has image a unit of Ch. Such a chart is flat over A with geometrically regular fibres whose components have dimension m−r; in the local-dimension convention of Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point it exhibits relative dimension m−r at x.

The criterion demands that some presentation have an invertible r×r minor; it does not demand this of an arbitrary redundant equation list, and r>m makes an invertible r×r minor impossible by definition of the matrix shape.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.

[F1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice; in this item it is used only through the cited algebra results; the selections of affine charts, primes and generators are finite (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

f is smooth at x if and only if f is locally of finite presentation at x, flat at x, and the fibre Xf(x) is geometrically regular at x (Smooth morphism of schemes).

[F3]

A standard smooth presentation of an A-algebra is an isomorphism with (A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr))g in which an r×r Jacobian minor has image a unit; a finitely presented A-algebra is standard smooth at a prime q if such a presentation exists after inverting some h∉q (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).

[F4]

Assume AC. For a ring map A→C of finite presentation and a prime q with p=A∩q, the map is standard smooth at q if and only if Ap→Cq is flat and the fibre C⊗Aκ(p) is geometrically regular at q (Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, clause 1).

[F5]

Assume AC. A standard smooth A-algebra is a finitely presented and flat A-algebra (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat).

[F6]

Assume AC. For a standard smooth presentation with m variables and r equations, every local ring of every geometric fibre is regular, every irreducible component of every geometric fibre has dimension m−r, and the local ring at a prime Q of the fibre is regular of dimension ht⁡(Q′)−r, where Q′ is the corresponding prime in the polynomial ring over the fibre field (Fibres of standard smooth algebras are regular of relative dimension).

[F7]

For C=A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr) the module ΩC/A is the cokernel of the Jacobian map Cr→Cm; this presentation carries no flatness or fibre hypothesis by itself (Jacobian presentation of Ω).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3F4

Fix x∈X with s=f(x) and choose affine open neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡C⊆X of x and V=Spec⁡A⊆S of s with f(U)⊆V; let q⊆C be the prime defining x. Since f is locally of finite presentation, A→C is a ring map of finite presentation.

1.2F2F4

Suppose first that f is smooth at x. By [F2] the map A→C is flat at q and its fibre at q is geometrically regular. By the pointwise criterion [F4] applied to the finitely presented map A→C at q, the map is standard smooth at q: there is h∈C∖q with Ch≅(A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr))g and an r×r Jacobian minor whose image in Ch is a unit. Thus the required chart exists and the 'only if' direction of the theorem holds.

1.3F2F3F5F6

Conversely, suppose such data U, V, h, m, r, fj, g and an invertible minor are given at x. Then A→Ch is a standard smooth A-algebra in the sense of [F3], so by [F5] it is flat and finitely presented over A; by [F6] its geometric fibres are regular, with every irreducible component of dimension m−r. Since f is moreover locally of finite presentation, the pointwise criterion [F2] applies at x and shows that f is smooth at x. This proves the 'if' direction and identifies the chart as flat with geometrically regular fibres.

1.4F6

Dimension clause. By [F6], every irreducible component of the fibre of the chart over any field extension of κ(p) has dimension m−r, so for a point y of the geometric fibre lying over the image of x, every open neighbourhood of y in that fibre has dimension m−r and the local dimension of Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point equals m−r; this is independent of the field extension. Hence the chart has relative dimension m−r at x in the convention fixed on this page, and the same computation is what makes the integer attached to a smooth point well defined there.

2.1F3F7

Presentation warning. The presentation produced in step 1.2 is existential, and the criterion must not be applied to an arbitrary equation list: over a field k, the algebra k=k[t]/(t) is smooth of relative dimension 0 and has the presentation k[t]/(t), whose 1×1 Jacobian matrix has entry 1, an invertible minor; but the redundant list (t,t2) writes the same quotient with r=2 and m=1, so the Jacobian matrix is 2×1 and has no 2×2 minor at all. By [F7] the module of differentials is unchanged by the redundant presentation; only the existence of one good presentation is asserted.

2.2F1step 1.1step 1.2

Choice audit. The Axiom of Choice is used as declared in [F1], through [F4], [F5] and [F6]. The affine chart, prime and generator selections of steps 1.1 and 1.2 are finite. No other choice principle and no incompatible-axiom branch is invoked.

□

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources