How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The smooth locus is open
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let be a morphism locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms) and let be its smooth locus (The smooth locus of a morphism). Then is an open subset of , and the restriction of to this open subset is a smooth morphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
For locally of finite presentation the smooth locus is a subset of ; is smooth exactly when , gives , and smoothness at a point is a germ condition, so it is preserved by restricting the source to an open neighbourhood of the point (The smooth locus of a morphism).
Assume AC. For locally of finite presentation and with , smoothness of at is equivalent to the following: there are affine opens of and of with and, writing for the prime of , a presentation of for some as in which some minor of the Jacobian matrix has image a unit of (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis).
A morphism is locally of finite presentation at when there are affine opens and with , and a finitely presented ring map (Locally finite presentation morphisms).
For a ring the distinguished opens are the basic opens of (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum), and an open subset of a scheme carries its open subscheme structure (Affine open subschemes).
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Fix , write for the prime of corresponding to in an affine chart, and put . By [F2] there are affine opens of and of with and, for some , a presentation in which an Jacobian minor has image a unit of .
Let and let be the corresponding prime; then . The same neighbourhoods and and the same element with the same presentation satisfy the criterion of [F2] at , since the displayed presentation of has its Jacobian minor invertible in and ; hence is smooth at . As was arbitrary, .
The set is open in by [F4] and contains by [F2]. Thus every point has an open neighbourhood contained in , so is open in .
The restriction is smooth: at each the morphism is smooth at by the definition of the locus, and smoothness at a point is preserved by restricting the source to an open neighbourhood of that point, so the restriction is smooth at every point of , hence smooth.
If then is open and the empty restriction is smooth by [F1]; otherwise the argument of steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 applies at every point of the locus. The Axiom of Choice [F5] is assumed in the Statement and used exactly through the criterion [F2], invoked in steps 1.1 and 2.1. [F1, F2, F5, step 4.1]
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Section 29.34 (smooth morphisms, tags 01V4-01V9) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022 public draft, Section 25.3 (standard reference, not scraped)