How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let be smooth at with relative dimension (Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point). Then there are affine open subschemes containing and containing with , an element and affine open subschemes containing , such that factors as where is the relative affine space over the base (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base) and the first arrow is étale at and is an -morphism. The target is only shrunk Zariski locally: the factorisation is asserted over the chosen affine .
Equivalently, a smooth morphism of relative dimension is locally, on the source, étale over relative affine -space over the base.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
Assume AC. For locally of finite presentation at with , is smooth at if and only if there are affine opens of and of with and a presentation of , for some , as in which some minor of the Jacobian matrix is a unit of ; such a chart is flat with geometrically regular fibres and exhibits relative dimension at (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).
A standard smooth presentation of an -algebra is a presentation with an invertible Jacobian minor; the integer is its relative dimension, the permutation of variables replaces a given invertible minor by one in the first columns without changing the relative dimension, and (a localisation of a polynomial ring) is allowed (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).
is étale at when it is smooth at and ; the chart of [F1] is smooth with relative dimension , so a chart with and invertible Jacobian minor is étale at the corresponding point (Étale morphism of schemes, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).
A morphism with affine charts on which the ring map is a finitely presented algebra is locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms), and a standard smooth presentation is a finitely presented algebra (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).
On one defines with its structure morphism, and these definitions agree under localisation of , so is for the affine open and equals (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base).
An open subset of a scheme is given the open subscheme structure; a principal open of an affine is the affine open subscheme (Affine open subschemes).
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The smooth chart. By [F1] there are affine opens containing and containing with , an element not in the prime of , and a presentation whose Jacobian has an invertible minor; this chart exhibits relative dimension at . Since is smooth at by hypothesis and [F1] is an iff, such a chart exists; set , a nonnegative integer.
Regrouping the variables. By [F2] we may permute so that the invertible minor involves the first columns, and we write with . Then , and the presentation of step 1.1 becomes ; the matrix is invertible in by construction. This is a standard smooth presentation of over with variables and equations, hence of relative dimension , by [F2].
The étale arrow. The map has an affine chart with a finitely presented algebra (step 2.1), so it is locally of finite presentation by [F4] and the presentation of step 2.1 is a chart with invertible Jacobian minor in the sense of [F1]; by the two-way criterion of [F1] it is smooth at the prime of , and its relative dimension there is . By [F3] the morphism is étale at .
The factorisation. By [F5] the affine scheme is , the relative affine space over the affine open . The composite is the morphism induced by , which is the restriction of the structure map of the chart; hence it is the restriction of to the principal open , which contains by [F6] and lies over by step 1.1. This gives the asserted factorisation of through , with first arrow étale at by step 3.1.
Conclusion and accounting. Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 produce, for a smooth of relative dimension at , the affine opens and together with the étale -morphism , whose composite with the projection to is the restriction of . The Axiom of Choice [F7] is assumed in the Statement and is used exactly through the Jacobian criterion [F1] in steps 1.1 and 3.1; the regrouped presentation is built from the same data and makes no further choice. [F1, F3, F7, step 4.1]
Depends on
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point
- Étale morphism of schemes
- Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis
- Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Affine n-space over an arbitrary base
- Affine open subschemes
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Section 29.34 (smooth morphisms are locally affine space over the base, tags 01V4-01V9) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022 public draft, Section 25.3 (standard reference, not scraped)