Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let f:X→S be smooth at x∈X with relative dimension n=reldim⁡f(x) (Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point). Then there are affine open subschemes V=Spec⁡A⊆S containing s=f(x) and U0=Spec⁡C⊆X containing x with f(U0)⊆V, an element h∈C and affine open subschemes U=Spec⁡Ch⊆U0 containing x, such that U→f(U)⊆V factors as U→ eˊtale An×SV⟶V, where ASn is the relative affine space over the base (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base) and the first arrow is étale at x and is an S-morphism. The target is only shrunk Zariski locally: the factorisation is asserted over the chosen affine V⊆S.

Equivalently, a smooth morphism of relative dimension n is locally, on the source, étale over relative affine n-space over the base.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.

[F1]

Assume AC. For f locally of finite presentation at x with s=f(x), f is smooth at x if and only if there are affine opens U0=Spec⁡C of x and V=Spec⁡A of s with f(U0)⊆V and a presentation of Ch, for some h∈C∖q, as Ch≅(A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr))g in which some r×r minor of the Jacobian matrix is a unit of Ch; such a chart is flat with geometrically regular fibres and exhibits relative dimension m−r at x (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).

[F2]

A standard smooth presentation of an R-algebra S is a presentation S≅(R[x1,…,xm]/(f1,…,fr))g with an invertible r×r Jacobian minor; the integer m−r≥0 is its relative dimension, the permutation of variables replaces a given invertible minor by one in the first r columns without changing the relative dimension, and c=0 (a localisation of a polynomial ring) is allowed (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).

[F3]

f is étale at x when it is smooth at x and reldim⁡f(x)=0; the chart of [F1] is smooth with relative dimension m−r, so a chart with m=r and invertible Jacobian minor is étale at the corresponding point (Étale morphism of schemes, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).

[F4]

A morphism with affine charts on which the ring map is a finitely presented algebra is locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms), and a standard smooth presentation is a finitely presented algebra (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).

[F5]

On S=Spec⁡A one defines ASn=Spec⁡A[t1,…,tn] with its structure morphism, and these definitions agree under localisation of A, so An×SV is Spec⁡A[t1,…,tn] for the affine open V=Spec⁡A⊆S and equals ASn×SV (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base).

[F6]

An open subset of a scheme is given the open subscheme structure; a principal open D(h) of an affine Spec⁡C is the affine open subscheme Spec⁡Ch (Affine open subschemes).

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

The smooth chart. By [F1] there are affine opens U0=Spec⁡C containing x and V=Spec⁡A containing s with f(U0)⊆V, an element h∈C not in the prime q of x, and a presentation Ch≅(A[t1,…,tm]/(f1,…,fr))g whose Jacobian has an invertible r×r minor; this chart exhibits relative dimension m−r at x. Since f is smooth at x by hypothesis and [F1] is an iff, such a chart exists; set n:=reldim⁡f(x)=m−r, a nonnegative integer.

2.1F2step 1.1

Regrouping the variables. By [F2] we may permute t1,…,tm so that the invertible minor involves the first r columns, and we write A′:=A[tr+1,…,tm]=A[y1,…,yn] with yi=tr+i. Then A[t1,…,tm]=A′[t1,…,tr], and the presentation of step 1.1 becomes Ch≅(A′[t1,…,tr]/(f1,…,fr))g; the r×r matrix (∂fj/∂ti)i,j≤r is invertible in Ch by construction. This is a standard smooth presentation of Ch over A′ with m′=r variables and c=r equations, hence of relative dimension m′−c=0, by [F2].

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1

The étale arrow. The map Spec⁡Ch→Spec⁡A′ has an affine chart with a finitely presented algebra A′→Ch (step 2.1), so it is locally of finite presentation by [F4] and the presentation of step 2.1 is a chart with invertible Jacobian minor in the sense of [F1]; by the two-way criterion of [F1] it is smooth at the prime of x, and its relative dimension there is r−r=0. By [F3] the morphism Spec⁡Ch→Spec⁡A′ is étale at x.

4.1F5F6step 1.1step 3.1

The factorisation. By [F5] the affine scheme Spec⁡A′=Spec⁡A[y1,…,yn] is An×SV⊆ASn, the relative affine space over the affine open V⊆S. The composite Spec⁡Ch→Spec⁡A′→V=Spec⁡A is the morphism induced by A→A′→Ch, which is the restriction of the structure map A→C of the chart; hence it is the restriction of f to the principal open U=Spec⁡Ch⊆U0, which contains x by [F6] and lies over V by step 1.1. This gives the asserted factorisation of f∣U through An×SV→V⊆S, with first arrow étale at x by step 3.1.

5.1

Conclusion and accounting. Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 produce, for a smooth f of relative dimension n at x, the affine opens V⊆S and U=Spec⁡Ch⊆X together with the étale S-morphism U→An×SV, whose composite with the projection to S is the restriction of f. The Axiom of Choice [F7] is assumed in the Statement and is used exactly through the Jacobian criterion [F1] in steps 1.1 and 3.1; the regrouped presentation is built from the same data and makes no further choice. [F1, F3, F7, step 4.1] □

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources