Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Etale neighbourhoods and elementary etale neighbourhoods of a point

Definition

Let S be a scheme (Schemes) and let s∈S be a point, with residue field κ(s) (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme).

An 'etale neighbourhood of (S,s) is a pair (U,u) consisting of a scheme U, a morphism of schemes φ:U→S that is 'etale (Étale morphism of schemes) and a point u∈U with φ(u)=s. One writes φ:(U,u)→(S,s). A morphism of 'etale neighbourhoods f:(V,v)→(U,u) of (S,s) is a morphism of S-schemes (Schemes and morphisms over a base) f:V→U with f(v)=u.

The 'etale neighbourhood (U,u)→(S,s) is elementary if the canonical map of residue fields κ(s)→κ(u) is an isomorphism, that is, if κ(u)=κ(s).

Three conventions belong to the definition. First, no affineness is required of U; in the arguments on this page the neighbourhoods produced are affine when this is useful, and the definition above is the general one of Stacks Definition 37.35.1. Second, the point u need not be closed in U, and the morphism U→S is required to be 'etale as a morphism, not merely 'etale at the point u; a morphism that is 'etale only on an open neighbourhood of u gives an 'etale neighbourhood after replacing U by that neighbourhood. Third, if U⊆S is an open neighbourhood of s, then (U,s)→(S,s) is an 'etale neighbourhood, and it is elementary since the residue field at s is unchanged; the composition of two 'etale neighbourhoods of (S,s) is again one, and the composition of elementary ones is elementary because both residue field maps are isomorphisms.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources