How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polynomial rings are flat and smooth
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and an integer. The polynomial algebra is a free -module with the monomials as a basis, hence flat over , and the structure morphism (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base) is flat, locally of finite presentation and smooth of relative dimension (Smooth morphism of schemes, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point). Its fibres are affine -spaces over the residue fields, and for the morphism is the identity of , which is étale (Étale morphism of schemes).
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the smoothness conclusion, since the Jacobian criterion used below assumes it; the flatness statement is choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.
A free module over a commutative ring is flat without a choice assumption (Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat), and for affine charts with , flatness of over implies flatness at every point of without choice (the converse assumes AC) (Affine-local flatness); the pointwise definition of flatness is in Flat morphism of schemes.
A standard smooth presentation of an -algebra is a presentation with an invertible Jacobian minor; the case is allowed and is exactly a localisation of a polynomial ring, and the relative dimension is (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps). In particular itself is standard smooth over of relative dimension , by the empty equation list with .
Assume AC. For locally of finite presentation at , is smooth at if and only if some affine chart has a presentation with an invertible Jacobian minor; moreover such a chart is flat with geometrically regular fibres and exhibits relative dimension at (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis).
A morphism is smooth at when it is locally of finite presentation at , flat at and the fibre is geometrically regular at (Smooth morphism of schemes), and its relative dimension is the common local dimension of the geometric fibres over (Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).
A polynomial algebra over a ring is a finitely presented algebra, so the corresponding affine morphism is locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms).
On one has with its structure morphism, and these definitions agree under localisation of (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base).
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Flatness. The monomials form a basis of as an -module, so is free, hence flat over by [F1]. The morphism is the affine morphism by [F6], so it is flat at every point by the affine-local criterion [F1].
Finite presentation and the standard smooth chart. The -algebra is a polynomial algebra, hence finitely presented, so the structure morphism is locally of finite presentation by [F5]. The empty equation list exhibits as ; by [F2] this is a standard smooth presentation of relative dimension with the empty Jacobian having invertible minor, in the convention of [F2] in which the case is the localisation of a polynomial ring.
Smoothness of relative dimension n. The chart of step 1.2 is an affine chart of the morphism with an invertible Jacobian minor and with , ; since the morphism is locally of finite presentation by step 1.2, the smoothness direction of the Jacobian criterion [F3] applies at every point and exhibits relative dimension . By [F4] the morphism is smooth with relative dimension at every point, i.e. pure relative dimension ; its fibres are over the residue fields.
The case and accounting. For the polynomial algebra is , the morphism is the identity of , and the same argument gives smoothness of relative dimension , i.e. étaleness, by [F4]. The Axiom of Choice [F7] is assumed in the Statement and is used exactly through the Jacobian criterion [F3] in step 2.1; steps 1.1 and 1.2 are choice-free. [F3, F4, F6, F7, step 1.1]
Depends on
- Étale morphism of schemes
- Flat morphism of schemes
- Affine-local flatness
- Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat
- Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps
- Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point
- Affine n-space over an arbitrary base
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- The affine line is smooth but not etale Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Sections 29.25 and 29.34-29.35 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022 public draft, Chapters 25-26 (standard reference, not scraped)