Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polynomial rings are flat and smooth

Statement

Let A be a commutative ring and n≥0 an integer. The polynomial algebra P=A[T1,…,Tn] is a free A-module with the monomials as a basis, hence flat over A, and the structure morphism AAn=Spec⁡P⟶Spec⁡A (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base) is flat, locally of finite presentation and smooth of relative dimension n (Smooth morphism of schemes, Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point). Its fibres are affine n-spaces over the residue fields, and for n=0 the morphism is the identity of Spec⁡A, which is étale (Étale morphism of schemes).

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the smoothness conclusion, since the Jacobian criterion used below assumes it; the flatness statement is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses displayed in the Statement, with the conventions fixed there.

[F1]

A free module over a commutative ring is flat without a choice assumption (Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat), and for affine charts f(U)⊆V with U=Spec⁡B, V=Spec⁡A flatness of B over A implies flatness at every point of U without choice (the converse assumes AC) (Affine-local flatness); the pointwise definition of flatness is in Flat morphism of schemes.

[F2]

A standard smooth presentation of an R-algebra S is a presentation S≅(R[x1,…,xm]/(f1,…,fr))g with an invertible r×r Jacobian minor; the case r=0 is allowed and is exactly a localisation of a polynomial ring, and the relative dimension is m−r (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps). In particular R[x1,…,xm] itself is standard smooth over R of relative dimension m, by the empty equation list with g=1.

[F3]

Assume AC. For f locally of finite presentation at x, f is smooth at x if and only if some affine chart has a presentation with an invertible Jacobian minor; moreover such a chart is flat with geometrically regular fibres and exhibits relative dimension m−r at x (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis).

[F4]

A morphism is smooth at x when it is locally of finite presentation at x, flat at x and the fibre is geometrically regular at x (Smooth morphism of schemes), and its relative dimension is the common local dimension of the geometric fibres over x (Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point).

[F5]

A polynomial algebra over a ring is a finitely presented algebra, so the corresponding affine morphism is locally of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms).

[F6]

On S=Spec⁡A one has ASn=Spec⁡A[T1,…,Tn] with its structure morphism, and these definitions agree under localisation of A (Affine n-space over an arbitrary base).

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F6

Flatness. The monomials T1a1⋯Tnan form a basis of P as an A-module, so P is free, hence flat over A by [F1]. The morphism AAn→Spec⁡A is the affine morphism Spec⁡P→Spec⁡A by [F6], so it is flat at every point by the affine-local criterion [F1].

1.2F2F5

Finite presentation and the standard smooth chart. The A-algebra P=A[T1,…,Tn] is a polynomial algebra, hence finitely presented, so the structure morphism is locally of finite presentation by [F5]. The empty equation list exhibits P as (A[T1,…,Tn]/(∅))1; by [F2] this is a standard smooth presentation of relative dimension n−0=n with the empty Jacobian having invertible 0×0 minor, in the convention of [F2] in which the case r=0 is the localisation of a polynomial ring.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.2

Smoothness of relative dimension n. The chart of step 1.2 is an affine chart of the morphism with an invertible Jacobian minor and with r=0, m=n; since the morphism is locally of finite presentation by step 1.2, the smoothness direction of the Jacobian criterion [F3] applies at every point and exhibits relative dimension n. By [F4] the morphism is smooth with relative dimension n at every point, i.e. pure relative dimension n; its fibres are An over the residue fields.

3.1

The case n=0 and accounting. For n=0 the polynomial algebra is P=A, the morphism is the identity of Spec⁡A, and the same argument gives smoothness of relative dimension 0, i.e. étaleness, by [F4]. The Axiom of Choice [F7] is assumed in the Statement and is used exactly through the Jacobian criterion [F3] in step 2.1; steps 1.1 and 1.2 are choice-free. [F3, F4, F6, F7, step 1.1] □

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources