Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A sufficiently positive divisor is nonspecial and Riemann-Roch counts its sections

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers.

Let k be a field, let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k of genus g=g(C) (Curves over a field, Genus via the Euler characteristic), let φ:C→Pk1 be a finite k-morphism, and let A be an effective divisor on C with OC(A)≅φ∗OPk1(1). Let D0 be any divisor on C and let n0=n0(D0,φ) be an integer supplied for D0 and φ by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem. Then for every n≥n0 and every effective divisor E the divisor D=D0+nA+E is nonspecial, H1(C,OC(D))=0 (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial), so Riemann-Roch computes its dimension exactly: l(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).

The concrete instance is the projective line. Take C=Pk1, φ=id and A=[∞], so that φ∗O(1)=O(1)≅O([∞]); then g=0 and, for every d∈Z, l(d[∞])=h0(Pk1,O(d))={d+1,d≥0,0,d<0,i(d[∞])=h1(Pk1,O(d))={0,d≥−1,−d−1,d≤−2, while deg⁡k(d[∞])=d⋅[κ(∞):k]=d. Consequently:

  1. for d≥−1 the divisor d[∞] is nonspecial, i(d[∞])=0, and Riemann-Roch reads l(d[∞])=d+1=deg⁡k(d[∞])+1−g — including the boundary case d=−1, where l=i=0 (the sheaf O(−1) has no sections);
  2. for d≤−2 the divisor is special, with l(d[∞])=0 and i(d[∞])=−d−1≥1, and Riemann-Roch reads 0−(−d−1)=d+1;
  3. so in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for d≥−1, and the exact threshold is the boundary value d=−1; the general statement only provides some threshold n0(D0,φ) depending on D0 and on the fixed morphism, which this instance computes exactly.

The "sufficiently positive" threshold of the general statement is the fixed-direction one of the vanishing theorem; the example does not assert the universal bound "deg⁡k(D)>2g−2 implies i(D)=0", which requires Serre duality and belongs to the next pair.

Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d (on another page) and ex-riemann-roch-projective-line-divisor (on this page) for the projective-line values l(d[∞])=d+1 and the nonspecial range. Both are examples and cannot carry a load; the citations are replaced by the published A-page suppliers Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists and Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, together with The Picard group of the projective line for the identification O(d[∞])≅O(d) of the attached sheaves. Every promised numerical claim is preserved: l(d[∞])=d+1 for d≥0, nonspeciality exactly for d≥−1, the boundary case d=−1 with l=i=0, and the fixed-direction restriction.

The current Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial supplies the fixed-direction vanishing, and Riemann-Roch as l minus i supplies the dimension identity. The current projective-line divisor and Picard interfaces Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line identify the attached twists; the published cohomology corollaries supply their dimensions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers; a field k, a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k of genus g, a finite k-morphism φ:C→Pk1, an effective divisor A with OC(A)≅φ∗O(1), a divisor D0 and an integer n0=n0(D0,φ) supplied by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem for D0; and the instance C=Pk1, φ=id, A=[∞], d∈Z.

[F1]

Fixed-direction nonspeciality: for every n≥n0 and every effective E, the divisor D0+nA+E is nonspecial, that is, H1(C,OC(D0+nA+E))=0; the threshold depends on D0 and on φ and is not a bound in the degree (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial, Special and nonspecial divisors).

[F2]

Riemann-Roch and the index of speciality: l(D)−i(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g with i(D)=h1(D)≥0, and D is nonspecial exactly when i(D)=0, equivalently when l(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g; here l(D)=h0(D) and i(D)=h1(D) (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Genus via the Euler characteristic, The index of speciality i(D), The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).

[F3]

Projective-line data: Pk1 is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus 0; the point at infinity has residue degree [κ(∞):k]=1; the coordinate section x0 vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so div⁡(x0)=[∞] and O(1)≅O([∞]) with deg⁡kO(1)=1 (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).

[F4]

The current The Picard group of the projective line identifies the degree class of every invertible sheaf on Pk1 with a unique twist. Together with the divisor-to-line-bundle interface in Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, this gives O(d[∞])≅O(d) for every d∈Z.

[F5]

Degree of a multiple: deg⁡k is a group homomorphism on divisors with deg⁡k[x]=[κ(x):k] for a closed point, so with [F3] one has deg⁡k(d[∞])=d (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve).

[F6]

Cohomology of the twists of the projective line: for n=1, H0(Pk1,O(d))≅k[x0,x1]d for d≥0 and 0 for d<0, while H1(Pk1,O(d))=0 for d≥−1 and has dimension (−d−11)=−d−1 for d≤−2; with [F4] these are l(d[∞]) and i(d[∞]) (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D)).

[F7]

Fixed direction only: the nonspeciality theorem is stated for the fixed ample direction A; it is explicitly not claimed there that every divisor of degree greater than 2g−2 is nonspecial, which requires the duality pair following this page (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6]; the computation evaluates the given data and selects nothing (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · apply the fixed-direction nonspeciality theorem and Riemann-Roch to the general divisor $D_0+nA+E$, then compute both sides explicitly on the projective line with the coordinate divisor $d[\infty]$
1.1F1

The general statement. By [F1], for n≥n0 and E≥0 the divisor D=D0+nA+E satisfies H1(C,OC(D))=0.

1.2F3F4

The projective-line instance and its sheaves. Let C=Pk1, φ=id and A=[∞]. By [F3] one has O(1)≅O([∞])=O(A)=φ∗O(1), so this is an instance of the general data. By [F4] the attached invertible sheaves satisfy O(d[∞])≅O(d) for every d∈Z; the identifications use the current divisor/Picard interfaces of [F3] and [F4].

1.3F3F5

The degree. By [F5] and [F3] the residue degree of infinity is 1, so deg⁡k(d[∞])=d⋅[κ(∞):k]=d.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Riemann-Roch for D. By [F2] the identity l(D)−i(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g holds with i(D)=h1(D); by step 1.1 i(D)=0 and D is nonspecial, so l(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g.

2.2F6step 1.2

The dimensions of the twists. By [F6] and step 1.2, l(d[∞])=h0(O(d)) is d+1 for d≥0 and 0 for d<0, while i(d[∞])=h1(O(d)) is 0 for d≥−1 and −d−1 for d≤−2. In particular i(d[∞])=0 exactly when d≥−1.

3.1F2F3F6step 2.2step 1.3

Nonspeciality and Riemann-Roch on the projective line. Combine steps 2.2 and 1.3. If d≥−1, then i(d[∞])=0, so d[∞] is nonspecial by [F2], and the identity of [F2] reads l(d[∞])=d+1=deg⁡k(d[∞])+1−g since g=0 by [F3]; at d=−1 this is l=i=0. If d≤−2, then i(d[∞])=−d−1≥1, so d[∞] is special by [F2], while l(d[∞])=0; the identity of [F2] reads 0−(−d−1)=d+1=deg⁡k(d[∞])+1−g. Hence in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for d≥−1, with d=−1 the exact threshold, whereas the general theorem supplies only the threshold n0(D0,φ) along the fixed direction.

4.1F1F7F8step 2.1step 3.1∎

Fixed-direction restriction and choice accounting. The general statement is the fixed-direction form of [F1]: it is a bound along the one ample direction A, depending on D0 and φ, and [F7] records that no universal bound deg⁡k(D)>2g−2 is asserted here; that bound belongs to the duality pair following this page. The Axiom of Choice of [F8] is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6] (the fixed-direction vanishing theorem, the divisor–tensor dictionary and the cohomology of projective space), and the computation selects nothing beyond the given curve, morphism, divisor and integer d.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources