How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sufficiently positive divisor is nonspecial and Riemann-Roch counts its sections
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers.
Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus (Curves over a field, Genus via the Euler characteristic), let be a finite -morphism, and let be an effective divisor on with . Let be any divisor on and let be an integer supplied for and by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem. Then for every and every effective divisor the divisor is nonspecial, (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial), so Riemann-Roch computes its dimension exactly: (Riemann-Roch as l minus i).
The concrete instance is the projective line. Take , and , so that ; then and, for every , while . Consequently:
- for the divisor is nonspecial, , and Riemann-Roch reads — including the boundary case , where (the sheaf has no sections);
- for the divisor is special, with and , and Riemann-Roch reads ;
- so in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for , and the exact threshold is the boundary value ; the general statement only provides some threshold depending on and on the fixed morphism, which this instance computes exactly.
The "sufficiently positive" threshold of the general statement is the fixed-direction one of the vanishing theorem; the example does not assert the universal bound " implies ", which requires Serre duality and belongs to the next pair.
Scaffold repair, recorded for the owner. The frozen scaffold cited the
examples-page item ex-cohomology-o-d-projective-line-all-d (on another page)
and ex-riemann-roch-projective-line-divisor (on this page) for the
projective-line values and the nonspecial range. Both are
examples and cannot carry a load; the citations are replaced by the published
A-page suppliers
Global sections of projective twists,
Top cohomology of projective twists and
Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, together with
The Picard group of the projective line for the identification
of the attached sheaves. Every
promised numerical claim is preserved: for ,
nonspeciality exactly for , the boundary case with
, and the fixed-direction restriction.
The current Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial supplies the fixed-direction vanishing, and Riemann-Roch as l minus i supplies the dimension identity. The current projective-line divisor and Picard interfaces Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree and The Picard group of the projective line identify the attached twists; the published cohomology corollaries supply their dimensions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice inherited from the current fixed-direction vanishing, divisor and Riemann-Roch suppliers; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus , a finite -morphism , an effective divisor with , a divisor and an integer supplied by the fixed-direction vanishing theorem for ; and the instance , , , .
Fixed-direction nonspeciality: for every and every effective , the divisor is nonspecial, that is, ; the threshold depends on and on and is not a bound in the degree (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial, Special and nonspecial divisors).
Riemann-Roch and the index of speciality: with , and is nonspecial exactly when , equivalently when ; here and (Riemann-Roch as l minus i, Genus via the Euler characteristic, The index of speciality i(D), The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)).
Projective-line data: is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus ; the point at infinity has residue degree ; the coordinate section vanishes exactly at infinity with multiplicity one, so and with (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree).
The current The Picard group of the projective line identifies the degree class of every invertible sheaf on with a unique twist. Together with the divisor-to-line-bundle interface in Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, this gives for every .
Degree of a multiple: is a group homomorphism on divisors with for a closed point, so with [F3] one has (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve).
Cohomology of the twists of the projective line: for , for and for , while for and has dimension for ; with [F4] these are and (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), The index of speciality i(D)).
Fixed direction only: the nonspeciality theorem is stated for the fixed ample direction ; it is explicitly not claimed there that every divisor of degree greater than is nonspecial, which requires the duality pair following this page (Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial).
The Axiom of Choice is available and is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6]; the computation evaluates the given data and selects nothing (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
The general statement. By [F1], for and the divisor satisfies .
The projective-line instance and its sheaves. Let , and . By [F3] one has , so this is an instance of the general data. By [F4] the attached invertible sheaves satisfy for every ; the identifications use the current divisor/Picard interfaces of [F3] and [F4].
The degree. By [F5] and [F3] the residue degree of infinity is , so .
Riemann-Roch for . By [F2] the identity holds with ; by step 1.1 and is nonspecial, so .
The dimensions of the twists. By [F6] and step 1.2, is for and for , while is for and for . In particular exactly when .
Nonspeciality and Riemann-Roch on the projective line. Combine steps 2.2 and 1.3. If , then , so is nonspecial by [F2], and the identity of [F2] reads since by [F3]; at this is . If , then , so is special by [F2], while ; the identity of [F2] reads . Hence in this family nonspeciality holds exactly for , with the exact threshold, whereas the general theorem supplies only the threshold along the fixed direction.
Fixed-direction restriction and choice accounting. The general statement is the fixed-direction form of [F1]: it is a bound along the one ample direction , depending on and , and [F7] records that no universal bound is asserted here; that bound belongs to the duality pair following this page. The Axiom of Choice of [F8] is inherited only through the suppliers of [F1], [F2], [F3], [F4] and [F6] (the fixed-direction vanishing theorem, the divisor–tensor dictionary and the cohomology of projective space), and the computation selects nothing beyond the given curve, morphism, divisor and integer .
Depends on
- Global sections of projective twists
- The Picard group of the projective line
- Top cohomology of projective twists
- Curves over a field
- The Axiom of Choice
- Degree divisor proper curve
- Divisors on a smooth proper curve
- Genus via the Euler characteristic
- The index of speciality i(D)
- The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D)
- Special and nonspecial divisors
- Sufficiently positive divisors in a fixed direction are nonspecial
- Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree
- Riemann-Roch as l minus i
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy), Chs. 8 and 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025), Ch. 18.5 and Ch. 21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV) (standard reference, not scraped)