Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a nonconstant pp in F[x]F[x], the ideal (p)(p) is maximal and F[x]/(p)F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when pp is irreducible

Statement

Let FF be a field and let pF[x]p\in F[x] be nonconstant. The following are equivalent:

  1. pp is irreducible;
  2. the principal ideal (p)(p) is maximal;
  3. the quotient ring F[x]/(p)F[x]/(p) is a field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field FF and a nonconstant polynomial pF[x]p\in F[x].

[L1]

The monic gcd of two polynomials is a polynomial linear combination of them (Bézout identity and the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials over a field).

[L2]

The principal ideal (p)(p) is the smallest ideal containing pp (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).

[L3]

A maximal ideal is a proper ideal with no proper ideal strictly between it and the whole ring (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

[L4]

In the quotient ring R/IR/I, multiplication is (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I (The quotient ring R/IR/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I).

[L5]

For a commutative ring RR, the quotient R/MR/M is a field if and only if MM is maximal (R/MR/M is a field if and only if MM is a maximal ideal).

[L6]

An irreducible element is a nonzero nonunit with no factorization into two nonunits (Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

In a commutative ring the multiples of pp form an ideal containing pp and lie in every ideal containing pp, so [L2] identifies (p)(p) with the set of multiples of pp. Suppose pp is irreducible and f+(p)f+(p) is a nonzero residue class; then pfp\nmid f. If a common divisor dd of p,fp,f were a nonunit, a factorization p=dep=de and [L6] would make ee a unit, so dd would be associate to pp and dfd\mid f would imply pfp\mid f, a contradiction. Thus every common divisor is a unit, and [L1] gives Ap+Bf=1A p+B f=1, whence [L4] gives (B+(p))(f+(p))=1+(p)(B+(p))(f+(p))=1+(p); every nonzero class is invertible, so the quotient is a field.

givenL1L2L4L6algebra
2.1

Conversely, suppose the quotient is a field and p=abp=ab. By [L4], the two residue classes have product zero, so one is zero; say a(p)a\in(p). The characterization established in step 1.1 gives a=pca=pc, and hence p=ab=pcbp=ab=pcb. A direct leading-coefficient argument shows that F[x]F[x] has no zero divisors, because FF is a field, so cancellation of the nonzero polynomial pp gives cb=1cb=1 and makes bb a unit. The other case similarly makes aa a unit, and [L6] makes pp irreducible.

step 1.1givenL2L4L6algebra
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove that irreducibility is equivalent to quotient fieldness, and [L5] identifies quotient fieldness with maximality of (p)(p) in the sense of [L3].

step 1.1step 2.1L3L5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 43 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources