How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
with complete addition and multiplication tables
Example
Let be the residue class of in . Then , and the field has elements with tables
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient and the residue class of .
For a field , the quotient is a field exactly when the nonconstant polynomial is irreducible (For a nonconstant in , the ideal is maximal and is a field exactly when is irreducible).
The ring is a field (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic (The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic).
Verification
The polynomial has value at both and , so it has no root in and is irreducible. By [L1] and [L2], is a field.
Every residue has the unique form with , and the relation is , hence .
Applying characteristic-two addition and the reduction in step 2.1 gives every entry in the two displayed tables. In particular and , so the three nonzero elements form the cyclic group predicted by [L3].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 73 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Finite Fields, Examples 1.2-1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)