Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every basis of a finite field over a subfield is a normal basis

Statement

False claim. For every extension E/Fq of finite fields, every Fq-basis of E is a normal basis (Normal bases of a finite Galois extension).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The ring L:=F2[t]/(t2+t+1) with α the class of t, so that α2=α+1 because α2+α+1=0 and 1=1 in characteristic two.

[L1]

A polynomial of degree 2 or 3 over a field is irreducible if and only if it has no root in that field (A polynomial of degree two or three over a field is irreducible exactly when it has no root in the field); and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible (For a nonconstant p in F[x], the ideal (p) is maximal and F[x]/(p) is a field exactly when p is irreducible).

[L4]

A normal basis of K/F is an ordered F-basis of the form (σ1γ,,σnγ) for a single γK, indexed by Gal(K/F) (Normal bases of a finite Galois extension).

[L5]

Every finite Galois extension has a normal basis (Every finite Galois extension has a normal basis).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

t2+t+1 has no root in F2, its values at 0 and 1 both being 1, so it is irreducible and L is a field by [L1]; it is the minimal polynomial of α, so [L:F2]=2 with ordered basis (1,α) by [L2], and L has four elements 0,1,α,α+1.

L1L2given
2.1

By [L3] the extension L/F2 is Galois with Gal(L/F2)={id,σ}, where σ(x)=x2.

step 1.1L3
3.1

The conjugate lists of the four elements are (0,0), (1,1), (α,α+1) and (α+1,α), using α2=α+1 and (α+1)2=α2+1=α. Their underlying sets are {0}, {1} and {α,α+1}.

step 1.1step 2.1given
4.1

The list (1,α) is an F2-basis of L by step 1.1, but its underlying set {1,α} is none of the three sets in step 3.1, so it is not the conjugate list of any element and hence is not a normal basis by [L4]. The false claim therefore fails already for L/F2.

step 1.1step 3.1L4
5.1

What is true is the existential statement: some element of L generates a normal basis, and α does, since (α,α+1) is a list of two distinct elements whose only vanishing F2-combinations are trivial, as α0, α+10 and α+(α+1)=10. That is the content of [L5], which asserts existence and never universality.

step 3.1step 4.1L4L5

Remarks

  • Where the false claim comes from. The normal basis theorem is an existence statement, and its proofs single out an element by a nonvanishing condition — a determinant in the infinite case, a cyclic vector in the finite case. Both conditions genuinely exclude some elements, as A normal basis of F8 over F2 shows over F8.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources