Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Function field of an integral finite-type scheme

Statement

Let k be a field, let X be an integral finite-type k-scheme, and let η be its generic point. For every nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X, the stalk K=OX,η is canonically isomorphic to Frac⁡Γ(U,OX). The extension K/k is finitely generated, and restriction embeds Γ(X,OX) into K. For the last assertion assume AC: if X is geometrically integral for the chosen algebraic closure kˉ/k, then K⊗kkˉ is a domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The structure morphism X→Spec⁡k, the integral finite-type scheme X, its generic point η, and a chosen algebraic closure kˉ/k for the geometric-integrality clause. AC is assumed only for that final clause.

[F1]

An integral scheme is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. (Integral schemes)

[F2]

A morphism is locally of finite type when each point has an affine neighbourhood over an affine base with a finite-type ring map; finite type also requires quasi-compactness. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms)

[F3]

For affine schemes, global sections recover the coordinate ring and morphisms correspond contravariantly to ring maps. (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)

[F4]

A generic point η of X satisfies {η}‾=X. (Generic points of irreducible closed subsets)

[F5]

The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime p is Ap. (The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p)

[F6]

For a prime p, Ap is the localization at A∖p. (Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R)

[F7]

For a domain A, Frac⁡(A) is the localization of A at A∖{0}. (The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain)

[F8]

The canonical map from a domain to its fraction field is injective. (Frac⁡(D) is a field and d↦d/1 embeds the integral domain D)

[F9]

A field extension is finitely generated when it is generated as a field by a finite list. (Finitely generated field extensions F(a1,…,ar))

[F10]

Geometric integrality means integrality of the chosen algebraic-closure fibre. (Geometric properties of fibres)

[F11]

After extending the ground field to kˉ, the inverse image of an affine open U=Spec⁡A is Spec⁡(A⊗kkˉ). (Affine charts after extension of the ground field)

[F12]

A module is flat if the multiplication maps I⊗RM→M are injective for all finitely generated ideals I⊆R. (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests)

[F13]

AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F14]

Under AC, every proper ideal of a nonzero commutative ring is contained in a maximal ideal. (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

[F15]

A ring map that sends a multiplicative set to units factors uniquely through its localization. (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S−1R)

[F16]

Points of Spec⁡A are prime ideals, and V(I)={p:I⊆p}. (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets)

[F17]

D(a)={p:a∉p} is open in Spec⁡A. (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)

AC use: Only the geometric-integrality clause uses AC: after showing A⊗kkˉ≠0, F14 supplies a maximal ideal, so the affine chart Spec⁡(A⊗kkˉ) is nonempty and the integral-scheme criterion F1 applies. The other claims and the tensor-localization argument are choice-free.

Proof

1.1F1F4F16F17given

Fix a nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A. Since η is generic, a nonempty open cannot omit η: its closed complement would contain {η}‾=X. Thus η∈U, and let p be its corresponding prime. By F1, A is a nonzero domain, so (0) is a prime. If p≠(0), choose a∈p with a≠0. Then D(a) is a nonempty open by F16--F17, since it contains (0), but it does not contain η. This contradicts genericity as above, so p=(0).

2.1F3F5F6F7step 1.1

Restricting the structure sheaf from X to its open subscheme U does not change the stalk at η. By F5 it is A(0), and F6--F7 identify this localization canonically with Frac⁡A. By F3, Γ(U,OX)≅A. These identifications all pass through the same stalk K=OX,η, so for every such U they give the canonical isomorphism K≅Frac⁡Γ(U,OX).

3.1F1F2F9step 2.1algebra

Apply F2 at η to obtain an affine neighbourhood W=Spec⁡B for which k→B is of finite type. By F1, B is a domain, and step 2.1 identifies K with Frac⁡B. Choose finite algebra generators b1,…,br for B over k. Then Frac⁡B=k(b1,…,br), so F9 gives that K/k is finitely generated. The list may be empty, in which case B=k and K=k.

3.2F1F3F8step 2.1given

Restriction to the generic stalk is a ring map Γ(X,OX)→K. If a global section maps to zero, then on every nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A its restriction maps to zero in Frac⁡A under step 2.1. F8 makes A→Frac⁡A injective, so the section vanishes on each such U. Affine opens cover X; the sheaf uniqueness axiom therefore makes the global section zero. Hence the restriction map is injective.

3.3F1F10F11F12F13F14F15step 2.1algebra

Assume the geometric-integrality clause and fix a nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A. By F12, the k-module A is flat: the only finitely generated ideals of the field k are (0) and k, and the corresponding multiplication maps are injective. Tensoring the injection k↪kˉ with A gives an injection A≅A⊗kk↪A⊗kkˉ. Thus R=A⊗kkˉ is nonzero. By AC and F14, R has a maximal ideal, so Spec⁡R=Ukˉ is nonempty. By F11 it is an affine open in the chosen geometric fibre Xkˉ; F10 makes that fibre integral, so F1 implies R is a domain. Let S=A∖{0}. The injection just proved shows that its image S′={a⊗1:a∈S} avoids zero in R. There is a canonical ring isomorphism K⊗kkˉ≅(S−1A)⊗kkˉ≅(S′)−1R: the forward map sends (a/s)⊗λ to (a⊗λ)/(s⊗1), and its inverse sends (a⊗λ)/(s⊗1) to (a/s)⊗λ; F15 verifies these maps extend through the indicated localizations and are inverse on the generators. Since a localization of a domain at a multiplicative set avoiding zero is a domain, K⊗kkˉ is a domain.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3

Steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2 prove the canonical function-field identification, finite generation and injectivity for every nonempty affine chart; step 3.3 proves the geometric-integrality implication under its stated AC assumption. The zero-generator case is included in step 3.1, and if kˉ=k the tensor claim reduces to the field property of K. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources