How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Birational morphisms restrict to isomorphisms between principal affine opens
Statement
Let be a field, let and be integral -schemes of finite type, and let be a birational morphism that is locally of finite type. Then there exist nonempty affine open subschemes and with , the induced ring map of finite type, and an element , such that the localised map sending to , is an isomorphism, where denotes the localisation of at the image of . Consequently restricts to an isomorphism of the principal open subschemes determined by : there is a nonempty open subscheme such that is an isomorphism and is affine, namely .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , integral finite-type -schemes and , and a birational morphism that is locally of finite type.
The morphism is birational: and the stalk map is an isomorphism. (Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes)
Let be an integral finite-type -scheme with generic point . For every nonempty affine open the stalk is canonically isomorphic to ; here . (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)
A morphism is locally of finite type when every point of has an affine open neighbourhood and lies in an affine open of such that and is of finite type. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms)
A commutative -algebra is of finite type when for some and elements . (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)
For a domain , the field of fractions consists of fractions with , . (The field of fractions of an integral domain)
For every integral domain the localisation is a field and the canonical map , , is an injective unital ring homomorphism. ( is a field and embeds the integral domain )
An integral scheme is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. (Integral schemes)
For commutative unital rings the assignment is a natural bijection , so is a contravariant equivalence with quasi-inverse global sections. (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)
For , the morphism induced by identifies with the open locally ringed subspace of . (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open)
For , the principal distinguished subset is . (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)
If is a unital homomorphism of commutative rings such that is a unit for every , then there is a unique unital ring homomorphism with , namely . (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through )
A morphism is an open immersion when it identifies isomorphically with an open subscheme of . (Open immersions of schemes)
Proof
Since is locally of finite type, [F3] applied at the point provides a nonempty affine open and an affine open with and the induced ring map of finite type.
By [F7] the rings and are domains, since and are nonempty affine opens of the integral schemes and . By [F2] the stalks at the generic points are canonically identified with the fraction fields, and .
The stalk map of [F1] is the localisation of the chart map at the generic point, so under the identifications of step 1.2 it is the map induced by . By [F1] this map is an isomorphism; in particular is injective, because its composite with the injection is the injection of [F6].
By [F4] there are finitely many elements with , the case meaning is generated by the empty list over ; in particular is then surjective.
Since is an isomorphism by step 2.1, and , each has the form with and , by [F5]. Multiplying by and using that is injective gives the equality in . Put , an element of ; when this is .
In the localisation of at the image of the class of every is a unit, because divides ; hence the image of equals , an element in the image of the localised map . Since and localisation of an algebra presentation is generated by the localised generators, [F11] shows that is surjective.
The composite is injective: the localisation of the domain at the nonzero element is a subring of with by [F5] and [F6], and under these identifications the composite is the localisation map of the domain at the nonzero element , which is injective by [F6].
Steps 4.1 and 4.2 show that is an isomorphism. By [F8] it corresponds to an isomorphism of affine schemes. The localisation maps and induce open immersions and whose images are and by [F9] and [F10]; the composite is restricted to the open subscheme and factors through the isomorphism , so by [F12] the restriction of to is an isomorphism onto , and it is invertible after restriction to the open subschemes and .
Preimages of principal opens under the chart map are principal opens: a prime lies over exactly when , that is , so . Setting gives a nonempty open subscheme of , because in the domain makes by [F10], and the restriction is an isomorphism by step 5.1. The construction used only the finitely many generators of a finite-type presentation and the finitely many denominators of step 3.2; no infinite choice is made, and for the element is , so that is itself the required isomorphism onto . ∎
Depends on
- Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Integral schemes
- Function field of an integral finite-type scheme
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- $\operatorname{Frac}(D)$ is a field and $d\mapsto d/1$ embeds the integral domain $D$
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open
- Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum
- Universal property of localisation: maps that invert $S$ factor uniquely through $S^{-1}R$
- Open immersions of schemes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.51.5 (tag 0BAC) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Definition 29.51.1 (tag 01RO) (standard reference, not scraped)