Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Birational morphisms restrict to isomorphisms between principal affine opens

Statement

Let k be a field, let X and Y be integral k-schemes of finite type, and let f:X→Y be a birational morphism that is locally of finite type. Then there exist nonempty affine open subschemes U=Spec⁡A⊆X and V=Spec⁡B⊆Y with f(U)⊆V, the induced ring map φ:B→A of finite type, and an element σ∈B∖{0}, such that the localised map Bσ⟶Aσ, sending b/σm to φ(b)/φ(σ)m, is an isomorphism, where Aσ denotes the localisation of A at the image of σ. Consequently f restricts to an isomorphism f−1(D(σ))∩U=D(φ(σ))⟶D(σ) of the principal open subschemes determined by σ: there is a nonempty open subscheme V0=D(σ)⊆V such that f−1(V0)∩U→V0 is an isomorphism and f−1(V0)∩U is affine, namely D(φ(σ)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, integral finite-type k-schemes X and Y, and a birational morphism f:X→Y that is locally of finite type.

[F1]

The morphism f is birational: f(ηX)=ηY and the stalk map OY,ηY→OX,ηX is an isomorphism. (Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes)

[F2]

Let X be an integral finite-type k-scheme with generic point η. For every nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X the stalk K=OX,η is canonically isomorphic to Frac⁡Γ(U,OX); here Γ(U,OX)≅A. (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)

[F3]

A morphism f:X→S is locally of finite type when every point of X has an affine open neighbourhood U and f(U) lies in an affine open V=Spec⁡A of S such that U=Spec⁡B and A→B is of finite type. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms)

[F4]

A commutative R-algebra A is of finite type when A=R[a1,…,an] for some n≥0 and elements ai∈A. (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)

[F5]

For a domain D, the field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D consists of fractions a/b with a,b∈D, b≠0. (The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain)

[F6]

For every integral domain D the localisation Frac⁡(D) is a field and the canonical map D→Frac⁡(D), d↦d/1, is an injective unital ring homomorphism. (Frac⁡(D) is a field and d↦d/1 embeds the integral domain D)

[F7]

An integral scheme is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. (Integral schemes)

[F8]

For commutative unital rings A,B the assignment φ↦Spec⁡(φ) is a natural bijection Hom⁡CRing(A,B)≅Hom⁡LRS(Spec⁡B,Spec⁡A), so A↦Spec⁡A is a contravariant equivalence with quasi-inverse global sections. (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)

[F9]

For g∈R, the morphism induced by R→Rg identifies Spec⁡(Rg) with the open locally ringed subspace D(g) of Spec⁡R. (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open)

[F10]

For g∈R, the principal distinguished subset is D(g)={p∈Spec⁡(R):g∉p}. (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)

[F11]

If f:R→A is a unital homomorphism of commutative rings such that f(s) is a unit for every s∈S, then there is a unique unital ring homomorphism f~:S−1R→A with f~∘λS=f, namely f~(r/s)=f(r)f(s)−1. (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S−1R)

[F12]

A morphism j:U→X is an open immersion when it identifies U isomorphically with an open subscheme of X. (Open immersions of schemes)

Proof

technique · direct: choose an affine chart of finite type at the generic point, clear the finitely many denominators of a finite algebra presentation, and compare the resulting principal localisations
1.1F3given

Since f is locally of finite type, [F3] applied at the point ηX provides a nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X and an affine open V=Spec⁡B⊆Y with f(U)⊆V and the induced ring map φ:B→A of finite type.

1.2F2F7

By [F7] the rings A and B are domains, since U and V are nonempty affine opens of the integral schemes X and Y. By [F2] the stalks at the generic points are canonically identified with the fraction fields, K(X)=OX,ηX≅Frac⁡A and K(Y)=OY,ηY≅Frac⁡B.

2.1F1F6step 1.2

The stalk map of [F1] is the localisation of the chart map φ at the generic point, so under the identifications of step 1.2 it is the map Frac⁡B→Frac⁡A induced by φ. By [F1] this map is an isomorphism; in particular φ is injective, because its composite with the injection A↪Frac⁡A is the injection B↪Frac⁡B of [F6].

3.1F4step 2.1

By [F4] there are finitely many elements a1,…,an∈A with A=B[a1,…,an], the case n=0 meaning A=B[ ] is generated by the empty list over B; in particular φ is then surjective.

3.2F5F6step 2.1

Since Frac⁡B→Frac⁡A is an isomorphism by step 2.1, and A⊆Frac⁡A, each ai has the form ai=bi/si with bi∈B and si∈B∖{0}, by [F5]. Multiplying by si and using that A↪Frac⁡A is injective gives the equality siai=bi in A. Put σ=s1⋯sn, an element of B∖{0}; when n=0 this is σ=1.

4.1F4F11step 3.1step 3.2

In the localisation Aσ of A at the image of σ the class of every si is a unit, because si divides σ; hence the image of ai equals φ(bi)φ(si)−1, an element in the image of the localised map Bσ→Aσ. Since A=B[a1,…,an] and localisation of an algebra presentation is generated by the localised generators, [F11] shows that Bσ→Aσ is surjective.

4.2F5F6step 3.2

The composite Bσ→Aσ→Frac⁡(Aσ) is injective: the localisation Aσ of the domain A at the nonzero element φ(σ) is a subring of Frac⁡A with Frac⁡(Aσ)=Frac⁡A by [F5] and [F6], and under these identifications the composite is the localisation map Bσ→Frac⁡B=Frac⁡A of the domain B at the nonzero element σ, which is injective by [F6].

5.1F8F9F10F12step 4.2

Steps 4.1 and 4.2 show that φσ:Bσ→Aσ is an isomorphism. By [F8] it corresponds to an isomorphism Spec⁡Aσ→Spec⁡Bσ of affine schemes. The localisation maps B→Bσ and A→Aσ induce open immersions Spec⁡Aσ→Spec⁡A and Spec⁡Bσ→Spec⁡B whose images are D(φ(σ)) and D(σ) by [F9] and [F10]; the composite Spec⁡Aσ→Spec⁡A→Spec⁡B is f restricted to the open subscheme Spec⁡Aσ⊆U and factors through the isomorphism Spec⁡Aσ≅Spec⁡Bσ→Spec⁡B, so by [F12] the restriction of f to Spec⁡Aσ is an isomorphism onto Spec⁡Bσ, and it is invertible after restriction to the open subschemes D(φ(σ))⊆U and D(σ)⊆V.

6.1F10F11step 3.2step 5.1

Preimages of principal opens under the chart map are principal opens: a prime p∈Spec⁡A lies over D(σ) exactly when σ∉φ−1(p), that is φ(σ)∉p, so f−1(D(σ))∩U=D(φ(σ))=Spec⁡Aσ. Setting V0=D(σ) gives a nonempty open subscheme of V, because σ≠0 in the domain B makes (0)∈D(σ) by [F10], and the restriction f−1(V0)∩U→V0 is an isomorphism by step 5.1. The construction used only the finitely many generators of a finite-type presentation and the finitely many denominators of step 3.2; no infinite choice is made, and for n=0 the element is σ=1, so that U→V is itself the required isomorphism onto V0=V. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources