How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scheme-theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a quasi-compact morphism of schemes and put . Then is a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf, and the closed subscheme is the scheme-theoretic image of . For every open , its restriction is the scheme-theoretic image of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a quasi-compact morphism .
A morphism is quasi-compact when inverse images of quasi-compact opens are quasi-compact Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms.
Under AC, for a scheme, quasi-coherent ideal sheaves and closed subschemes are in mutually inverse correspondence Quasi-coherent ideals and closed subschemes.
Localization of modules is exact, so it preserves kernels; it also commutes with finite products, including the empty product. Localisation of modules is exact
For an affine scheme and , the structure-sheaf sections on are . Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme
Proof
Let be an affine open of . By [F1], is quasi-compact, so its affine-open cover has a finite subcover ; when is empty, take the finite empty cover. The finite-subcover step and the correspondence used below are licensed by the given AC.
Write and let be induced by . The sheaf condition makes inject into , so the kernel of equals the ideal . For , the opens cover , and [F4] identifies their section rings with . The sheaf condition therefore makes the kernel of equal to . By [F3], localizing the exact sequence identifies this kernel with : localization commutes with the finite product. The same argument includes the empty cover, for which both kernels are the whole source ring.
Thus is the ideal sheaf associated to on every affine , so is quasi-coherent.
By [F2], defines a closed subscheme . On each affine , the map factors through , so factors through it. If a closed subscheme defined on by also receives , then ; hence factors through that competing closed subscheme. This proves minimality.
Repeating the kernel computation on an open gives the restriction of to . The correspondence in [F2] therefore identifies with the scheme-theoretic image of .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Scheme-theoretic image
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms
- Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves
- Quasi-coherent ideals and closed subschemes
- Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers
- Localisation of modules is exact
- Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme
Used by
- The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups Definition
- Chow lemma for proper Noetherian schemes Lemma
- Fixed loci are closed and a normal subgroup fixing a point fixes the orbit closure Lemma
- Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field Lemma
- SNC projective compactifications of smooth quasiprojective varieties Lemma
- Line bundles of degree at least 2g+1 are very ample Theorem
- The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)