Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An affine scheme of finite type over a field has a finitely generated coordinate ring

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field (Field) and let X=Spec⁡A be an affine k-scheme (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings). If X→Spec⁡k is of finite type (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms), then A is a finitely generated k-algebra (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Consequently the coordinate ring of a group scheme of finite type over k (Group schemes of finite type over a field) whose underlying scheme is affine is finitely generated. The Axiom of Choice is used for affine-chart quasi-compactness and to turn a finite distinguished-open cover into a unit-ideal relation (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal); no other choice is made.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A morphism of finite type is quasi-compact and locally of finite type; locally of finite type over Spec⁡k means that every point of X has an affine open neighbourhood U=Spec⁡B with k→B of finite type, that is, B a finitely generated k-algebra. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms, Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)

[F2]

For every Zariski-open U⊆Spec⁡A and every point p∈U there is f∈A with p∈D(f)⊆U. (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)

[F3]

For f∈A the basic open D(f) has Γ(D(f),OX)=Af and is identified with the open subscheme Spec⁡Af, compatibly with restriction of sections. (Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme, A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open, Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R)

[F4]

Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, every affine scheme is quasi-compact; the published proof uses the AC-dependent quasi-compactness of distinguished opens. (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact)

[F5]

If Spec⁡A=⋃λ∈ΛD(fλ), then the ideal generated by the fλ is the unit ideal. This is the unit-ideal use of the Axiom of Choice, in addition to [F4]. (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal, The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k, an affine k-scheme X=Spec⁡A, and the hypothesis that X→Spec⁡k is of finite type.

1.1F1given

By [F1] the morphism X→Spec⁡k is quasi-compact and locally of finite type, so its affine open charts Spec⁡B with B a finitely generated k-algebra cover X; quasi-compactness extracts finitely many of them, giving X=⋃i=1nUi with Ui=Spec⁡Bi and Bi finitely generated over k.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

Each Ui is affine, hence quasi-compact by [F4], and by [F2] every point of Ui lies in some distinguished open D(f)⊆Ui with f∈A; finitely many such sets cover Ui. Collecting the finitely many results over i=1,…,n, there are f1,…,fm∈A with X=⋃j=1mD(fj) and D(fj)⊆Ui(j) for a suitable index i(j).

3.1F3step 2.1algebra

Fix j and put i=i(j), so that D(fj)⊆Ui=Spec⁡Bi; let b∈Bi be the restriction of the global section fj to Ui. A prime q∈Ui has image p=q∩A under the open immersion, so fj∉p if and only if b∉q, and therefore D(fj)=D(b) as open subsets of Ui. The structure sheaf of X restricted to Ui is that of Ui, so by [F3] Afj=Γ(D(fj),OX)=Γ(D(b),OUi)=(Bi)b, a principal localization of a finitely generated k-algebra and hence again a finitely generated k-algebra.

4.1F5step 3.1chooseconstruct

For each j choose finitely many k-algebra generators of Afj and write them as fractions with numerators in A. By [F5] choose a unit relation 1=∑jλjfj with λj∈A. Let B⊆A be the k-subalgebra generated by all fj, all these numerators, and all λj. It is finitely generated, and the natural map Bfj→Afj is surjective for each j, since its image contains the chosen algebra generators.

5.1F5step 4.1algebra

Fix a∈A. For every j, surjectivity in step 4.1 gives a/1=bj/fjrj in Afj for some bj∈B; equality of localization fractions gives fjtj(fjrja−bj)=0 in A for some tj≥0. Thus fjrj+tja=fjtjbj∈B. Choose N≥1 exceeding the finitely many exponents rj+tj; then fjNa∈B for all j. Expanding (∑jλjfj)mN=1 shows 1=∑jcjfjN with cj∈B, because each monomial has some fj-exponent at least N and all λj,fj belong to B. Hence a=∑jcj(fjNa)∈B. This argument chooses N separately for each a, and proves A=B. If X is empty, the same unit-ideal conclusion gives A=0, which is finitely generated as well.

6.1F5step 5.1given∎

For the consequence, if G is a group scheme of finite type over k whose underlying scheme is affine, say G=Spec⁡A, then by definition its structure morphism G→Spec⁡k is of finite type, so the argument above makes its coordinate ring finitely generated over k. The AC-dependent inputs were affine-chart quasi-compactness [F4] and the unit-ideal relation [F5]; the subsequent selections were finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources