How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An affine scheme of finite type over a field has a finitely generated coordinate ring
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field (Field) and let be an affine -scheme (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings). If is of finite type (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms), then is a finitely generated -algebra (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras). Consequently the coordinate ring of a group scheme of finite type over (Group schemes of finite type over a field) whose underlying scheme is affine is finitely generated. The Axiom of Choice is used for affine-chart quasi-compactness and to turn a finite distinguished-open cover into a unit-ideal relation (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal); no other choice is made.
Facts & Assumptions
A morphism of finite type is quasi-compact and locally of finite type; locally of finite type over means that every point of has an affine open neighbourhood with of finite type, that is, a finitely generated -algebra. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms, Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras)
For every Zariski-open and every point there is with . (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)
For the basic open has and is identified with the open subscheme , compatibly with restriction of sections. (Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme, A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open, Principal localisation )
Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, every affine scheme is quasi-compact; the published proof uses the AC-dependent quasi-compactness of distinguished opens. (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact)
If , then the ideal generated by the is the unit ideal. This is the unit-ideal use of the Axiom of Choice, in addition to [F4]. (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal, The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field , an affine -scheme , and the hypothesis that is of finite type.
By [F1] the morphism is quasi-compact and locally of finite type, so its affine open charts with a finitely generated -algebra cover ; quasi-compactness extracts finitely many of them, giving with and finitely generated over .
Each is affine, hence quasi-compact by [F4], and by [F2] every point of lies in some distinguished open with ; finitely many such sets cover . Collecting the finitely many results over , there are with and for a suitable index .
Fix and put , so that ; let be the restriction of the global section to . A prime has image under the open immersion, so if and only if , and therefore as open subsets of . The structure sheaf of restricted to is that of , so by [F3] , a principal localization of a finitely generated -algebra and hence again a finitely generated -algebra.
For each choose finitely many -algebra generators of and write them as fractions with numerators in . By [F5] choose a unit relation with . Let be the -subalgebra generated by all , all these numerators, and all . It is finitely generated, and the natural map is surjective for each , since its image contains the chosen algebra generators.
Fix . For every , surjectivity in step 4.1 gives in for some ; equality of localization fractions gives in for some . Thus . Choose exceeding the finitely many exponents ; then for all . Expanding shows with , because each monomial has some -exponent at least and all belong to . Hence . This argument chooses separately for each , and proves . If is empty, the same unit-ideal conclusion gives , which is finitely generated as well.
For the consequence, if is a group scheme of finite type over whose underlying scheme is affine, say , then by definition its structure morphism is of finite type, so the argument above makes its coordinate ring finitely generated over . The AC-dependent inputs were affine-chart quasi-compactness [F4] and the unit-ideal relation [F5]; the subsequent selections were finite.
Depends on
- Affine schemes and their coordinate rings
- The Axiom of Choice
- Field
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Group schemes of finite type over a field
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
- Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it
- A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open
- Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme
Used by
- Lie algebras of subspace stabilizers and Lie-stable subspaces Lemma
- A finitely generated affine group scheme has a faithful finite-dimensional representation Theorem
- Affine group schemes of finite type are antiequivalent to finitely generated commutative Hopf algebras Theorem
- Chevalley: every closed subgroup is a line stabilizer Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Swanson (notes), J. Pevtsova (lecturer), Algebraic Groups Lecture Notes, University of Washington, Fall 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)