Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lie algebras of subspace stabilizers and Lie-stable subspaces

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let G be an affine group scheme of finite type over a field k with Lie algebra g=Lie⁡(G) (The Lie algebra of a group scheme), let (V,r) be a rational representation (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme), and let W⊆V be a subspace with scheme-theoretic stabilizer Stab⁡G(W) (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers). Then: (a) Lie⁡(Stab⁡G(W))={x∈g:xW⊆W} (Milne 10.31); (b) if moreover k has characteristic 0, G is connected and smooth, and gW⊆W, then W is G-stable. In particular a subspace of a finite-dimensional representation of a connected semisimple group in characteristic zero is G-stable if and only if it is stable under g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An affine group scheme G of finite type over k with Lie algebra g (The Lie algebra of a group scheme), a rational representation (V,r) with differential dr:g→glV, a subspace W⊆V, and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer Stab⁡G(W) with R-points {g∈G(R):r(g)WR=WR} (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers).

[F1]

The universal stabilizer equations. Put A=O(G) and Q=V/W. The representation coaction and its inverse coaction are ρ:V→V⊗A and (id⁡⊗S)ρ. Under AC, Q has a basis by Every vector space has a basis, so its coordinate functionals detect zero in Q⊗kR for every k-algebra R. Applying these functionals to the images of w∈W under both coactions gives coefficient equations in A for rR(g)WR⊆WR and rR(g)−1WR⊆WR. Together they express equality and cut out a closed subgroup scheme of G. Its coordinate algebra is a quotient of A, hence finitely generated over k by An affine scheme of finite type over a field has a finitely generated coordinate ring; thus the stabilizer is of finite type, even when V is infinite-dimensional. (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers, Fibre product of schemes)

[F2]

The differential action. A dual-number point eεX acts on V[ε] by 1+ε dr(X), with inverse 1−ε dr(X). This follows directly by evaluating the representation coaction at a point reducing to the identity. For finite-dimensional V, it is the matrix calculation Lie⁡(GL⁡n)=Mn(k) of The Lie algebra of the general linear group; the same coaction calculation works for arbitrary V without treating its automorphism functor as a finite-type scheme. (The Lie algebra of a group scheme, The tangent space at the identity is a vector space, and Lie is a functor)

[F3]

Left exactness of Lie⁡. For algebraic subgroups H1,H2⊆G with fibre product over a morphism, Lie⁡ commutes with the fibre product: in particular the Lie algebra of the pullback of a closed subgroup under a morphism is the fibre product of the Lie algebras, and Lie⁡(H1∩H2)=Lie⁡(H1)∩Lie⁡(H2) (see (a)); moreover if Lie⁡(H)=Lie⁡(G), H is smooth and G is connected, then H=G (see (b)) (The Lie functor: exactness, fixed points and generation, The tangent space at the identity is a vector space, and Lie is a functor).

[F4]

Cartier's theorem. In characteristic 0 every affine group scheme of finite type over k is smooth (Cartier's theorem: affine group schemes in characteristic zero are smooth; AC is used here and is inherited by this item).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

The subgroup H=Stab⁡G(W) is represented by the closed coefficient equations of [F1]. A point eεX∈G(k[ε]) acts by 1+ε dr(X) by [F2], so it carries w0+εw1 to w0+ε(w1+dr(X)w0). This belongs to W[ε] for every w0,w1∈W exactly when dr(X)W⊆W. In that case the inverse 1−ε dr(X) also preserves W[ε], so the condition is equality of submodules, as required by the stabilizer functor. This proves the criterion without any dimensional restriction on V.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Part (a). The Lie algebra of the closed subgroup H consists of its dual-number points reducing to the identity. The inclusion H↪G injects those points into g by [F3]; step 1.1 identifies its image with {X∈g:dr(X)W⊆W}. Hence Lie⁡(H)={X∈g:XW⊆W}, with the differential action understood as in the Statement.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

Part (b). Assume char⁡k=0, G connected and smooth, and gW⊆W. By step 2.1, Lie⁡(Stab⁡G(W))=g; the stabilizer is an affine group scheme of finite type, so it is smooth by Cartier's theorem; and the Lie-exactness criterion for connected groups now gives Stab⁡G(W)=G, that is, W is G-stable.

4.1F4step 2.1step 3.1∎

The particular case. If G is connected semisimple in characteristic 0, then G is smooth by Cartier's theorem, and step 3.1 applies: gW⊆W implies that W is G-stable. Conversely, if W is G-stable then Stab⁡G(W)=G and step 2.1 gives gW=Lie⁡(Stab⁡G(W))W⊆W. Hence W is G-stable if and only if gW⊆W.

Remarks

  • In positive characteristic the implication (b) can fail: G need not be smooth, and Lie⁡(Stab⁡G(W))=g does not force Stab⁡G(W)=G; this is why both characteristic 0 and Cartier's theorem appear in the statement.
  • The equality of part (a) is Milne 10.31; the extra hypothesis gW⊆W in part (b) is exactly Lie⁡(Stab⁡G(W))=Lie⁡(G) by part (a).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources