Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Lie functor: exactness, fixed points and generation

Statement

Let G be an algebraic group over k with Lie algebra g (The Lie algebra of a group scheme), and let H,H1,H2 be algebraic subgroups. (a) For a finite inverse system (Gi) of algebraic groups, Lie⁡(lim←⁡Gi)≅lim←⁡Lie⁡(Gi); in particular Lie⁡ is left exact on exact sequences and Lie⁡(H1×GH2)=Lie⁡(H1)×Lie⁡(G)Lie⁡(H2), so if H1,H2⊆G then Lie⁡(H1∩H2)=Lie⁡(H1)∩Lie⁡(H2) (The tangent space at the identity is a vector space, and Lie is a functor). (b) Assume the Axiom of Choice for the geometric subgroup-generation assertions (The Axiom of Choice). If Lie⁡(H)=Lie⁡(G), H is smooth and G is connected, then H=G; if the Lie algebras of smooth subgroups H1,…,Hn generate g as a Lie algebra and G is connected, then the Hi generate G. (c) If H acts on G by conjugation, then Lie⁡(CG(H))=gH and Lie⁡(NG(H))/Lie⁡(H)=(g/Lie⁡(H))H; in particular dim⁡CG(H)≤dim⁡gH, with equality iff CG(H) is smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraic group G over k with Lie algebra g, algebraic subgroups H,H1,H2⊆G, and the conjugation action of H on G; its adjoint action on g is constructed in [F1], without assuming G affine.

[F1]

For the Lie algebra as a functor of points, Lie⁡(G)(R)=g(R)=ker⁡(G(R[ε])→G(R)) naturally in G and R (The Lie algebra of a group scheme, The tangent space at the identity is a vector space, and Lie is a functor). Conjugation by h∈H(R) preserves this kernel and commutes with ε↦aε for every a∈R; it therefore gives an R-linear adjoint action on g⊗kR, natural in R. These actions glue on affine charts of test schemes. Since g is finite-dimensional, its automorphism functor is represented by GL⁡g (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring; if g=0, use the trivial group). The contravariant Yoneda lemma (For a presheaf P, Nat⁡(C(−,a),P)≅P(a) naturally in a and P) thus makes this a group-scheme representation of H. For affine G it agrees with The adjoint representation of an affine group scheme.

[F2]

For every finite-type group K, dim⁡Lie⁡(K)≥dim⁡K, with equality exactly when K is smooth (Milne, Proposition 1.37, printed p.18, proved by the smoothness criterion at the rational identity and translation). A smooth connected group is geometrically integral; therefore a closed smooth subgroup of the same dimension is the whole group. Under AC, a geometrically reduced finite-type group is smooth (Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected). The generated-subgroup construction from geometrically reduced sources is Milne, Proposition 2.51, printed p.56; its geometric reducedness is also explained in step 2.1.

Proof

1.1F1given

On every k-algebra R, the functor of points of a group-scheme limit is the limit of the point functors. The Lie functor is the kernel of the reduction map from R[ε] to R, and kernels commute with limits: a compatible tuple reduces to the identity exactly when each component does. Hence Lie⁡(lim←⁡Gi)=lim←⁡Lie⁡(Gi). Applying this to a kernel or a fiber product gives left exactness and the displayed fiber-product equality. For subgroup inclusions their fiber product is their scheme intersection, and the vector-space fiber product is the intersection of the Lie subspaces.

1.2F1F2

Put h=Lie⁡(H). By [F1], eεX lies in the centralizer precisely when it commutes with H(S) for every k[ε]-algebra S. This is equivalent to X being invariant in the rational adjoint representation: invariance tested on any k-algebra R gives heε′Xh−1=eε′X in G(R[ε′]) for all h∈H(R); taking R=S and specializing ε′ to the given nilpotent ε∈S proves the centralizer condition. Conversely take S=R[ε] and h∈H(R) to recover invariance. Thus Lie⁡(CG(H))=gH. The tangent dimension criterion [F2] gives the stated dimension inequality and equality case.

2.1F2F1step 1.1algebra

Assume AC for part (b). Suppose Lie⁡(H)=Lie⁡(G) with H smooth. Since H⊆G we have dim⁡H≤dim⁡G, and by [F2] dim⁡G≤dim⁡Lie⁡(G)=dim⁡Lie⁡(H)=dim⁡H, so equality holds throughout; thus G is smooth and dim⁡G=dim⁡H. A closed subgroup of the connected smooth group G of dimension dim⁡G equals G by [F2], so H=G. Now let H1,…,Hn be smooth subgroups whose Lie algebras generate g, and let H be the algebraic subgroup they generate, which is the scheme-theoretic closure of the union of finite product maps from the Hi. The product maps and their inverses are stable under multiplication and inversion, so their closure is a subgroup. These maps have geometrically reduced sources and are schematically dominant as a family onto that closure, hence the closure is geometrically reduced and therefore smooth as a finite-type group scheme; by functoriality of Lie⁡, Lie⁡(H) is a Lie subalgebra of g containing each Lie⁡(Hi), hence containing the subalgebra they generate, which is all of g; so Lie⁡(H)=g=Lie⁡(G) and the first part gives H=G.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

For the normalizer, the same calculation gives eεXhe−εXh−1=eε(X−Ad⁡(h)X). If eεX normalizes H, then for every R and h∈H(R) this commutator lies in H(R[ε]) and reduces to the identity; by [F1] this means X−Ad⁡(h)X∈hR. Hence the class of X in g/h is H-invariant. Conversely, if that class is invariant, take any k[ε]-algebra S and h∈H(S). The vector X−Ad⁡(h)X lies in hS, so the corresponding dual-number point of H(S[ε′]) specializes to the displayed commutator in H(S) under ε′↦ε. This proves conjugation by eεX maps H(S) into itself; applying the argument to −X gives equality, so eεX normalizes H. Thus Lie⁡(NG(H)) is the inverse image of (g/h)H, and its quotient by h is that invariant space. This is a quotient of Lie algebras; it is not a claim about Lie⁡(NG(H)/H) for nonsmooth H. These calculations prove all assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources