Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Limits of one-parameter orbits and concentrator subschemes

Definition

Let X be a separated k-scheme of finite type with an action of Gm (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers), and let Z⊆X be a Gm-stable closed subscheme. For a morphism φ:Gm×kX0→X, the limit lim⁡t→0φ(t) exists if φ extends to a morphism A1×X0→X, in which case the extension and its value at 0 are unique by separatedness; for a point x∈X(R) one writes tx for the orbit map and asks that t↦tx extend over AR1. When X=Spec⁡A is affine, the action is a Z-gradation A=⨁n∈ZAn and lim⁡t→0tx exists iff fn(x)=0 for all fn∈An with n<0; the concentrator subscheme X(Z) is the closed subscheme defined by the ideal generated by A0∩a+∑n<0An, where a=ker⁡(A→A(Z)) is the graded ideal of Z. The associated functor sends R to the set of x∈X(R) with lim⁡t→0tx∈Z(R).

The uniqueness in the first sentence follows from separatedness (Separated S-scheme): the equalizer of two extensions is closed in A1×X0 and contains Gm×X0. This open is schematically dense, since on every affine chart of X0 the map R[t]→R[t,t−1] is injective. The equalizer is therefore the whole source, also when X0 is nonreduced; the affine description is the gradation induced by the coaction of k[t,t−1] on A when X is affine (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings), and the closed subscheme structure is that of the ideal sheaf generated by the listed homogeneous pieces (Ideal sheaves). The functor-of-points description of X(Z) is stated here and proved in Representability and smoothness of concentrator subschemes; no representability is asserted by the definition itself.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources