How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Luna map and the Bialynicki-Birula decomposition
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a smooth geometrically connected variety over with an action of .
(a) Definite affine actions and Luna maps. Suppose is affine and its coordinate ring is nonnegatively graded, . Then the fixed locus is smooth and connected, and the limit retraction realizes as the vector bundle associated with the finite projective -module , where . This isomorphism depends on choices of homogeneous lifts. If and every tangent weight at is strictly positive, then and every Luna map obtained from a homogeneous complement of in is an equivariant isomorphism. More generally, an equivariant morphism between smooth geometrically connected affine varieties with strictly positive tangent weights at a fixed rational point is an isomorphism if its differential there is an isomorphism. No canonical choice of Luna map is asserted.
(b) Bialynicki-Birula decomposition. Suppose the action is locally affine, is complete and the fixed scheme is finite and constant. For each fixed point the attracting scheme is smooth, locally closed, and equivariantly isomorphic by a Luna map to the affine space . Its geometric points are precisely the with , and . The topological space of is the disjoint union of these cells. There is a unique attracting point with open dense and a unique repelling point with . These conclusions apply to smooth homogeneous spaces satisfying the stated action hypotheses; affineness or strict contraction is not automatic for an arbitrary .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the data and hypotheses of (a) or (b).
The affine concentrator ideal is generated by negative-degree functions and the degree-zero equations of its stable target; its scheme represents the orbit-extension functor, is smooth when the ambient scheme and target are smooth, and glues for locally affine actions with locally immersive realization and affine limit map (Limits of one-parameter orbits and concentrator subschemes, Representability and smoothness of concentrator subschemes).
Completeness means properness (Complete varieties), and smoothness has the geometric regularity convention of Smooth morphism of schemes. Fixed loci of a torus on a smooth scheme are smooth; degree-zero projection in a nonnegative grading is a retraction onto the fixed locus (Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions for the smoothness input).
At a smooth fixed point, the cotangent quotient decomposes into weights. Homogeneous lifts of a finite basis define an equivariant Luna map with invertible differential. A smooth closed subscheme of a smooth scheme has locally free conormal module: in their regular local rings, lift a basis of the kernel of the cotangent map to part of a regular system of parameters; the equal-dimension regular-quotient argument of Graded Nakayama and the Hesselink regularity comparison shows these lifts generate its ideal locally. Consequently is finite projective over in the affine case.
In a Noetherian local ring, the intersection of the maximal-ideal powers is zero (The Krull intersection is the -torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case). Each quotient is a quotient of : express products of ideal generators modulo the next power. Hence strictly positive cotangent weights give strictly positive weights in every such quotient for .
Proof
In (a), is an ideal, , and projection onto degree zero gives with its fixed-locus section. Hence is connected as the image of geometrically connected ; it is smooth by [F2]. By [F3], is finite projective over , and each graded piece is projective as a direct summand. Choose -linear sections of for the finitely many nonzero pieces. Their images form a graded -submodule with . These choices define an equivariant map .
This map is surjective by induction on positive degree: an element of differs from a lift in by a sum of products of positive-degree elements, and each product has factors of smaller degree. Degree zero is already . Smooth geometrically connected and are geometrically integral: distinct irreducible components of a regular scheme are disjoint and open, so connectedness leaves one. Thus and are domains. Locally on , is free of rank ; the symmetric algebra is a polynomial domain of dimension , and its surjection to the domain has prime kernel of height zero, hence zero. These local isomorphisms give and the vector-bundle assertion.
For the strictly positive tangent case, the tangent space of at is the zero-weight space, hence zero; smooth connected is therefore the single rational point . The algebra has and positive grading. Every homogeneous lift of a cotangent basis generates by the same induction as step 2.1 and gives a surjection from a polynomial algebra on variables; dimension and integrality make it an isomorphism. This proves the Luna assertion. The same argument also applies when positivity is assumed only at the fixed point: inject into its regular local ring at ; [F4] and the weight decomposition of show that every nonconstant homogeneous element has positive degree, so . For an equivariant morphism with invertible differential, choose homogeneous cotangent lifts on the target and pull them back. They are homogeneous basis lifts on the source, so both resulting polynomial-algebra maps are isomorphisms, and hence so is the morphism.
In (b), choose an invariant affine neighborhood of each fixed rational point . An orbit with limit stays in : if its original point were in the invariant closed complement, so would its limit. Thus is the affine concentrator , independent of the neighborhood by the functor represented in [F1]; its realization is closed in , hence locally closed in . It is smooth by [F1]. The defining ideal kills negative tangent directions and the zero directions from the target point, leaving exactly . The action extends to , contracts all its points to , and has only this fixed point. This also proves connectedness: the image of an orbit extension is connected and meets , so every geometric point belongs to the component of . Step 3.1 therefore identifies equivariantly with .
Properness extends each geometric orbit map over zero by the valuative criterion, and its limit is fixed. Hence the finitely many cells are disjoint and cover . Geometric integrality of implies that exactly one cell is dense: one of their finitely many closures must be , and two disjoint dense locally closed subsets would give disjoint nonempty opens. This dense locally closed cell is open. It has dimension , so all tangent weights there are positive. Apply the same argument to the reciprocal action to obtain a unique point with all tangent weights negative. Its attracting cell for the original action has dimension zero and, by step 4.1, is just that point. Conversely a point with zero-dimensional attracting cell has no positive tangent weights and has no zero weights because the fixed scheme is finite and smooth, so all its weights are negative; uniqueness follows from the reciprocal action. This proves all the decomposition and extremal-cell claims.
Depends on
- Limits of one-parameter orbits and concentrator subschemes
- Representability and smoothness of concentrator subschemes
- Graded Nakayama and the Hesselink regularity comparison
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Complete varieties
- Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Krull intersection is the $(1-a)$-torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes (SGA 3 summer school, Luminy; Panoramas et Syntheses) (standard reference, not scraped)