Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cocharacter limit subgroups

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the geometric suppliers. Let G be a smooth affine algebraic group over k and let λ:Gm→G be a cocharacter, acting on G by t⋅g=λ(t)gλ(t)−1 (Split reductive groups for the notation, Limits of one-parameter orbits and concentrator subschemes). Then PG(λ)=G({g:lim⁡t→0t⋅g exists}), ZG(λ)=CG(λ(Gm)) and UG(λ) (the fibre of g↦lim⁡t→0t⋅g over e) are algebraic subgroups of G, with PG(λ)∩PG(−λ)=ZG(λ) and UG(λ) normal in PG(λ); over ka, PG(λ) and UG(λ) are the unique smooth subgroups whose geometric points are the g with the indicated limits. Then PG(λ),ZG(λ),UG(λ) are smooth; the multiplication map UG(λ)⋊ZG(λ)→PG(λ) is an isomorphism; UG(−λ)×PG(λ)→G is an open immersion; UG(λ) is connected and unipotent; and under the weight decomposition g=⨁n∈Zgn for the Gm-action one has Lie⁡ZG(λ)=g0, Lie⁡UG(λ)=⨁n>0gn and Lie⁡PG(λ)=g0⊕⨁n>0gn. If moreover G is reductive, then PG(λ)/UG(λ)≅ZG(λ) is reductive and Ru(PG(λ))=UG(λ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a smooth affine algebraic group G over k and a cocharacter λ:Gm→G acting by conjugation, with t⋅g=λ(t)gλ(t)−1.

[F1]

For an affine finite-type k-scheme X with a Gm-action and a Gm-stable closed subscheme Z, the concentrator X(Z) is representable as a closed subscheme of X, the limit morphism p is affine, and when X and Z are smooth the concentrator is the unique smooth closed subscheme with the corresponding geometric points (Representability and smoothness of concentrator subschemes, Limits of one-parameter orbits and concentrator subschemes).

[F2]

An affine finite-type group has a faithful finite-dimensional rational representation that is a closed immersion. The finite-dimensional representation of Gm decomposes into weight spaces with a finite adapted basis. The Lie functor preserves subgroup intersections and identifies tangent spaces using dual numbers. (Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations, Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, The Lie functor: exactness, fixed points and generation, Character and cocharacter lattices of a split torus)

[F3]

Fixed subschemes of multiplicative-type actions on smooth schemes are smooth; their tangent spaces are the fixed tangent spaces. This is the precise general smoothness input of Milne13.1 and13.10, printed pp.253–256, used independently of connectedness. For smooth connected affine reductive G, its torus centralizer is reductive with trivial unipotent radical. (Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers, Smooth morphism of schemes)

[F4]

Under the standing AC assumption, an orbit of a smooth finite-type group acting on a separated finite-type scheme over an algebraically closed field is locally closed, its orbit map is faithfully flat of finite presentation, and it represents the quotient by its scheme stabilizer. A trivial scheme stabilizer therefore makes the orbit map an isomorphism onto the orbit. (Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field, A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf)

[F5]

The algebraic implication of the triangular criterion makes a group with coconnected coordinate algebra unipotent; under the standing AC assumption its geometric closed-subgroup criterion identifies closed subgroups of an upper-unitriangular group as unipotent. (Unipotent groups are exactly the subgroups of some U_n, equivalently the groups with coconnected coordinate Hopf algebra)

Proof

Given: AC, smooth affine G over k, possibly disconnected, and λ:Gm→G.

1.1F1F3

The affine graded concentrator construction [F1] represents P=PG(λ) and the identity concentrator U=UG(λ) as closed subschemes of G. Conjugation acts by group automorphisms, so the limit of a product or inverse is the product or inverse of the limits, on every base algebra. Thus P is a subgroup and its limit map p:P→G is a homomorphism. Its image lies in the fixed subgroup Z=ZG(λ), since a limit at zero is fixed; p∣Z=id⁡ and U=ker⁡p is normal. Limits in both directions force every nonzero graded coefficient to vanish, giving PG(λ)∩PG(−λ)=Z scheme-theoretically. Fixed smoothness [F3] gives smooth Z, while [F1] applied to smooth G with targets G and {e} gives smooth P,U. Their smooth geometric-point models are unique by [F1].

1.2F2F1

Embed G in GL(V) by [F2] and choose a weight basis in which λ(t)=diag⁡(tm1,…,tmn), m1≥⋯≥mn. In GL(V), conjugation multiplies entry xij by tmi−mj. Thus PGL(V) has zero entries when mi−mj<0, ZGL(V) has zero entries for nonzero differences, and UGL(V) has identity diagonal blocks and zero entries unless mi−mj>0. These descriptions hold over every algebra. The corresponding groups for G are their scheme intersections with G, since the orbit limit in the ambient group lies in closed G. Applying the intersection formula for Lie and the dual-number entry calculation gives Lie⁡P=⨁r≥0gr, Lie⁡Z=g0, and Lie⁡U=⨁r>0gr.

2.1step 1.1

Multiplication U⋊Z→P has the explicit inverse g↦(gp(g)−1,p(g)). The first component has limit identity and the second is fixed; both maps are scheme morphisms and satisfy the inverse identities on every algebra. This proves the semidirect product as a group-scheme isomorphism, without inferring it merely from tangents and geometric points.

2.2F4F5F1F2step 1.2

Put U−=UG(−λ). The weight-block equations give U−∩P=1 on every algebra. Let the smooth group U−×Pop act on G by (u,p)⋅g=ugp; its scheme stabilizer at identity is therefore trivial. After algebraic closure, [F4] identifies its orbit map μ:U−×P→G with an isomorphism onto a locally closed orbit. Its differential at identity is addition ⨁r<0gr⊕⨁r≥0gr→g, an isomorphism by step 1.2. Between these smooth schemes this is the étale criterion at identity (the invertible Jacobian calculation in Milne13.33's proof). Translations by the acting group carry this calculation to every point of the domain; hence the locally closed orbit immersion is étale and therefore open. Open immersion descends along the faithfully flat field extension, so μ is the asserted open immersion over k. The graded limit action extends to A1×U→U and sends {0}×U to identity. Over the algebraic closure every point is connected to identity by that affine-line morphism, so U is geometrically connected, even for disconnected G. Its weight-block matrices lie in an upper-unitriangular group, making it unipotent by [F5].

3.1F3step 2.1step 2.2∎

If G is reductive, [F3] makes Z=CG(λ(Gm)) reductive. By step 2.1 the quotient P/U is Z, and U is smooth connected normal unipotent by step 2.2. Thus U⊆Ru(P); the image of Ru(P) in reductive Z is a smooth connected normal unipotent subgroup and is trivial. Consequently Ru(P)=U, proving the full reductive clause. All preceding assertions allow disconnected smooth affine G.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources