How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parabolic subgroups and Levi decomposition
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a split reductive group over , a Borel subgroup with base , and let , be as above (The root datum of a split reductive group). (a) For every subset there is a unique smooth parabolic subgroup containing with , where ; the correspondence is a bijection onto the set of smooth parabolic subgroup varieties of containing , and the standard parabolic subgroups are exactly the groups for cocharacters with for all , with . (b) The unipotent radical of is , directly spanned in any order, and the multiplication map is a group-scheme isomorphism (Levi decomposition), with the standard Levi subgroup of Standard Levi subgroups of a split reductive group. (c) Every smooth parabolic subgroup of containing is for a unique , and over an algebraically closed field every smooth parabolic subgroup of is conjugate by an element of to a unique standard parabolic . (d) and .
The general proper-quotient Definition still permits nonsmooth parabolic subgroup schemes; the standard classification above is restricted to smooth subgroup varieties. For example, in characteristic , the Frobenius preimage is nonsmooth, contains , and has proper quotient , so it is not one of these smooth .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a split reductive group with Borel and base .
The Bruhat decomposition gives , the cell structure of the , and the Tits system on (Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group, The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system).
Centralizers of tori are reductive, is the standard Levi subgroup with root system and Weyl group , and contains exactly the root groups with (Standard Levi subgroups of a split reductive group, Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers, Cocharacter limit subgroups).
A subgroup scheme is parabolic exactly when the quotient is complete, equivalently when contains a Borel subgroup of ; parabolic subgroups are connected and satisfy whenever they contain a Borel subgroup (Parabolic subgroups of an affine algebraic group, Solvable subgroups, the radical, and the Borel intersection), and over an algebraically closed field all Borel subgroups are conjugate with complete quotient (The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete, Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field); the root groups and their products in any order are as in Root subgroups of a split reductive group.
Length equals positive-root inversion number, a simple reflection permutes all positive roots except its simple root, and a reduced expression has positive inversion roots . The last assertion follows inductively from the length/sign rule. (Combinatorics of a reduced root datum) Smooth connected torus-stable subgroup containment follows from its selected Lie weights. (Weight subgroups of a torus action)
Proof
Choose an integral cocharacter whose simple-root pairings are zero on and strictly positive on : take the sum of rational dual vectors there and clear denominators as in the standard Levi lemma. Every root has simple coefficients of one sign, so exactly for , and the positive pairings occur precisely on . By [F2], the fixed group and are smooth connected reductive with the same root spaces and torus. The image of lies in , so ; equal dimension makes them equal. The cocharacter kernel is smooth connected unipotent with just the positive-pairing Lie weights. Its Lie algebra is contained in , hence [F4] puts it in . The root-coordinate theorem [F3] identifies it with the ordered product of the root groups in , in any order. Therefore and its unipotent radical is exactly , since is reductive. It contains by the nonnegative pairings of all positive roots, and the geometric Borel/properness criterion [F3] makes it parabolic. Define this smooth group to be .
A normalizer representative belongs to exactly when . Its conjugation orbit is , lying in the closed translate ; a nontrivial cocharacter of a torus has no limit at zero inside that torus. The stabilizer of this dominant in is : if nontrivial fixes it, choose a left descent so that is negative by [F4]. Then so . The reflection fixes and shortens ; induction gives . Conversely every generator of fixes . Since contains , a Bruhat cell is wholly contained in it exactly when its representative is, so [F1] gives . The same argument shows that any dominant cocharacter with these zero simple pairings gives this .
Let be any smooth closed subgroup. Over an algebraic closure put . It is a subgroup, because representatives multiply modulo , and [F1] makes the union of its cells. Set . For , both and lie in . Thus for each positive inversion root , both and lie in . Their rank-one elementary products give a representative of in . For a reduced expression of , the inversion roots in [F4] therefore give . The first is ; inductively, conjugating by the earlier simple factors puts in . Hence all letters lie in , so . The smooth closed groups and have the same geometric cells and are reduced, hence are equal; descent gives equality over . In particular this classifies every smooth parabolic containing , with no unsupported assumption that a general was already a limit group.
The subset is recovered by the negative simple root groups in , or equivalently the simple reflections in . Thus the classification is unique. Cocharacters with all positive-root pairings nonnegative give the same classification by step 2.1. Step 1.1 proves the complete ordered unipotent-radical and Levi decomposition in(b). For , the fixed group is and all positive root groups occur, giving ; for , there are no positive pairing weights and the limit group is . The torus case satisfies both endpoints with .
Over an algebraically closed field every smooth parabolic contains a Borel by [F3]. Conjugate that Borel to and apply step 3.1 to obtain a standard . If , the Borels and of the smooth connected affine group are conjugate by some , by [F3]. Hence normalizes , so by its self-normality in [F3]. Therefore , forcing and . This proves the full conjugacy and uniqueness in(c). Nonsmooth parabolics remain in the general conditional Definition: the Frobenius example has a nilpotent lower-entry condition and the stated proper quotient, and is excluded only from this smooth classification.
Depends on
- Combinatorics of a reduced root datum
- Weight subgroups of a torus action
- Standard Levi subgroups of a split reductive group
- Parabolic subgroups of an affine algebraic group
- Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group
- The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system
- Root subgroups of a split reductive group
- The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers
- Cocharacter limit subgroups
- The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete
- Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field
- Solvable subgroups, the radical, and the Borel intersection
- The Axiom of Choice
- The root datum of a split reductive group
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes (SGA 3 summer school, Luminy; Panoramas et Syntheses) (standard reference, not scraped)