Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let G be a smooth connected affine group variety over an algebraically closed field k and let T be a maximal torus. Then Chevalley's theorem holds: Ru(G)=(⋂B⊇TBu)red∘ and Ru(G)⋅T=(⋂B⊇TB)red∘, the intersections running over the finite set of Borel subgroups containing T. Consequently, for any torus S in G one has Ru(CG(S))=Ru(G)∩CG(S), and for a torus S acting on G one has Ru(GS)=Ru(G)S. In particular, if G is reductive, then GS is smooth, connected and reductive for every torus action by group automorphisms, in particular CG(S) has these properties for every torus S⊆G, and CG(T)=T for every maximal torus T of a reductive G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, smooth connected affine G over algebraically closed k, and maximal torus T; external torus actions are by group automorphisms.

[F1]

Cartans are smooth connected, lie in every Borel containing their maximal torus, and NG(B)=B. Borels containing T are conjugate under NG(T)(k); the connected normalizer of T equals CG(T) by multiplicative-type rigidity. Thus the set of these Borels is finite, indexed by a quotient of the finite component set of NG(T). (Cartan subgroups: conjugacy, density and normalizers, Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field, Borel subgroups, maximal tori and Borel pairs)

[F2]

R(G) is the reduced neutral intersection of all Borels. Smooth connected normal solvable subgroups lie in every Borel. The radical and unipotent radical are the largest smooth connected normal subgroups of their respective classes. (Solvable subgroups, the radical, and the Borel intersection, Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups)

[F3]

Torus fixed subgroups of smooth connected affine groups are smooth connected, and CG(S)∩B is a Borel of CG(S) whenever S⊆B. In particular Ru(G)S is smooth connected. (Fixed loci and centralizers of torus actions are connected)

[F4]

X=G/B0 is a smooth connected complete variety for any Borel B0, and embeds G-equivariantly as a closed orbit in some P(V): choose a Chevalley line with stabilizer B0, identify its orbit with the fppf homogeneous quotient, and use completeness to make that locally closed orbit closed. Replace V by the span of the orbit, so the embedding is nondegenerate. A smooth connected solvable group acting on a nonempty complete scheme has a fixed point. Every orbit of a smooth group is locally closed; an orbit of minimum dimension in its closure is closed. (The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete, Every subgroup scheme of an affine group is a line stabilizer, Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes, A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf, Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field, Borel fixed point theorem for complete schemes)

[F5]

Finite-dimensional representations of a split torus have finite character-weight decompositions; regular functions on an affine variety with algebraic group action form a rational representation, and every finite subset lies in a finite-dimensional subrepresentation. A nonzero representation of a unipotent group has a nonzero fixed vector. (Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule, Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations)

[F6]

Over perfect k, reduced neutral subgroup components are smooth connected, and a smooth connected solvable group is Bu⋊T for any maximal torus T. A unipotent group maps trivially to a group of multiplicative type, since its homomorphic image is both unipotent and multiplicative type. Homomorphic images of smooth connected affine groups are closed smooth connected subgroups. (Reduced identity components over perfect fields, Maximal tori of a smooth connected solvable group are conjugate, A subgroup that is both unipotent and diagonalizable is trivial, Group images are exact kernel quotients and preserve affine smooth connected properties)

Proof

Given: AC, smooth connected affine G over algebraically closed k, and maximal T.

1.1F1F2F6construct

Let Iu=(⋂B⊇TBu)red∘ and I=(⋂B⊇TB)red∘. The intersection set is finite by [F1]. These groups are smooth connected and normalized by NG(T), which permutes the factors; Iu is unipotent as a subgroup of one Bu. The normal unipotent radical Ru(G) lies in every B by [F2] and then in every Bu by its maximal normal-unipotent property, so Ru(G)⊆Iu. We prove the reverse inclusion by the action on X=G/B0.

1.2F4F5construct

We give the closed-orbit argument for unipotent actions on affine varieties. For an orbit O, let Y be its reduced affine closure. If its boundary is nonempty, the ideal of the boundary in O(Y) is a nonzero stable rational representation: the orbit is open dense in Y, so its boundary is proper. By [F5] choose a nonzero invariant function f in this ideal. Its value is constant on the dense orbit, hence f is that scalar on reduced Y. The boundary forces this scalar to be zero, contradicting f≠0. Therefore every such orbit is closed. This is the Kostant–Rosenlicht argument used in Milne17.65.

2.1F1F4F5step 1.1choose

Under G/B0→{Borels}, gB0 corresponds to gB0g−1; the map is injective because NG(B0)=B0. Thus XT(k) is the finite set of Borels containing T, and NG(T)(k) is transitive on it. Take the nondegenerate projective embedding X⊆P(V) from [F4], with weights Ξ for T. Choose an integral cocharacter λ pairing distinctly with the distinct elements of Ξ. Let χ− have minimum pairing. On the nonempty open set where the projection to Vχ− is nonzero, the limit under λ(t) as t→0 is that projected line, lying in X∩P(Vχ−)⊆XT. This projection has constant image because its irreducible domain maps to the finite fixed set. Since X spans V, its projections span Vχ−, so this space is one-dimensional. Write it as kv−, with point x−=[v−]∈XT.

3.1F1F4F5F6step 2.1choose

Let ℓ∈V∗ equal 1 on v− and vanish on every other weight space. The chart U(x−)=X∩{ℓ≠0} is affine and is contracted by λ to x−. In the dual projective space, every G-orbit meets the affine chart where evaluation on v− is nonzero: otherwise a nonzero dual vector would annihilate all gv−, which span V. The action of λ−1 contracts that dual chart to [ℓ], so the closure of every dual orbit contains [ℓ]. A closed orbit in the closure of G[ℓ] exists by [F4]; it also contains [ℓ], and hence is G[ℓ]. Thus G[ℓ] is closed and its stabilizer P has complete quotient. By Borel fixed points [F4], P contains a Borel. Since T⊆P, choose a Borel containing T inside (Pred)∘; conjugacy there to the previously obtained G-Borel shows it is a G-Borel B′. Thus Iu⊆Bu′⊆P. The dual line is Iu-stable, so U(x−) is Iu-stable.

4.1F1F4step 3.1

Translating this chart by NG(T)(k) supplies a T-stable and Iu-stable affine open U(x) containing every x∈XT(k), since this normalizer preserves Iu. These charts cover X: the closure of the T-orbit of any point is nonempty complete and has a T-fixed point x by [F4]; if the point lay outside U(x), its full orbit closure would lie in the closed T-stable complement, contradicting the presence of x.

5.1F2F4F5step 1.1step 4.1step 1.2

For any y∈X(k), the complete orbit closure Iuy‾ has an Iu-fixed point z by [F4]. Choose an Iu-stable affine chart from step 4.1 containing z. If the orbit met its closed stable complement, the whole orbit and its closure would lie there, excluding z. Thus the orbit lies in the chart and is closed there by step 1.2. It contains z, so it is a single point. Hence Iu fixes every point of X. The smooth reduced scheme Iu×X has dense rational points, so the action is scheme-theoretically trivial. Its stabilizers are all Borels, and consequently Iu lies in their full intersection. Smoothness and connectedness put it in its reduced neutral component R(G) by [F2]; being unipotent it lies in Ru(G). Together with step 1.1 this proves Iu=Ru(G).

6.1F6step 1.1step 5.1

Fix B0⊇T and its split quotient q0:B0=B0,u⋊T→T. The group I contains T and maps onto T with this section. Thus I=K⋊T, with K=I∩B0,u; the product isomorphism shows K smooth connected. It is unipotent and lies in every Borel B⊇T, so its homomorphism into the torus B/Bu is trivial by [F6]. Therefore K⊆Bu for all these Borels, hence K⊆Iu. Conversely Iu⊆K, so K=Iu=Ru(G) and I=Ru(G)T. This proves both Chevalley intersection identities scheme-theoretically.

7.1F2F3F6step 6.1choose

For a torus subgroup S, set C=CG(S) and choose a maximal torus T⊇S. The group Ru(G)∩C=Ru(G)S is smooth connected by [F3], unipotent and normal in C, so it lies in Ru(C). Conversely for every Borel B⊇T, C∩B is a Borel of C by [F3], and the normal smooth connected unipotent subgroup Ru(C) lies in it by [F2]. Thus Ru(C)⊆I=Ru(G)T. Its map into the torus I/Ru(G) is trivial, so Ru(C)⊆Ru(G)∩C. Equality follows. For an external torus action form H=G⋊S. Its unipotent radical is Ru(G): normal unipotent subgroups have trivial image in S, and Ru(G) is invariant under S by uniqueness. Since CH(S)=GS×S, the subgroup-centralizer equality in H gives Ru(GS)=Ru(G)S.

8.1F1F3step 6.1step 7.1∎

If G is reductive, Ru(G)=1, so step 7.1 and smooth connectedness in [F3] make every torus fixed subgroup, in particular every torus centralizer, reductive. For maximal T, the smooth connected CG(T) lies in every Borel containing T by [F1], hence in I=Ru(G)T=T by step 6.1; the reverse inclusion is immediate. Therefore CG(T)=T. This proves every stated consequence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

119 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources