How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule
Statement
Let be a field, let be a commutative Hopf algebra over (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field) and let be an -comodule (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme). For every finite subset there is a finite-dimensional subcomodule with . Consequently is the directed union of its finite-dimensional subcomodules. No basis of and no choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
The coaction satisfies and , and a subcomodule is a subspace with . (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Commutative Hopf algebras over a field)
For -vector spaces , the tensor product is also the quotient of the free -module on by the -span of the two additivity relations and , . Indeed this quotient has the bilinear universal property: extend a bilinear map by finite linear sums, which kill those relations. The resulting maps to and from the tensor product are inverse on spanning generators. (The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups)
A finite spanning list yields a finite basis: if it is dependent, solve a nontrivial relation for a vector with nonzero coefficient and delete that vector, preserving the span; the length strictly decreases. A given independent list can be extended in the same finite span by appending a spanning-list vector only when it is outside the current span. (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing , Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent, Linear subspace of a vector space)
Proof
Given: A field , a commutative Hopf algebra over , an -comodule and a finite subset .
(Coefficient criterion.) If are linearly independent and lie in a -vector space with in , then . Indeed, by [F2] the element of the free module on is a finite -linear combination of finitely many bilinearity generators; the spans and of the initial together with all vectors occurring in that finite witness are finite-dimensional and the same combination exhibits in . Extend to a finite basis of with for , choose a finite basis of , and use the universal property [F2] to identify with the matrices by ; the element becomes the matrix whose -th column is the coordinate vector of for and whose remaining columns vanish, so this matrix is zero and every is zero. The same argument shows that is injective for any inclusion : take a finite witness of a zero relation, extend a basis of the span of its original first factors in to a basis of the finite ambient first-factor space, and compare the resulting tensor coordinates. Thus the subspace notation is legitimate.
Let and write with linearly independent; such a representation exists by deleting redundant terms from a finite tensor expression, and then by [F1]. Put , a finite-dimensional subspace of containing .
In the situation of step 1.2, let be the quotient map. Applying to the coassociativity identity [F1] for gives , because ; since the are linearly independent, step 1.1 yields for every . The kernel of is : one inclusion is clear, and if a finite sum with linearly independent lies in that kernel, then , so step 1.1 gives and for every . Hence for all , and since one also has ; therefore and is a finite-dimensional subcomodule containing .
For a finite set , apply step 2.1 to each to obtain finite-dimensional subcomodules . The sum is finite-dimensional and contains , and it is a subcomodule because for each gives .
Consequently every element of lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule, and for two such subcomodules their sum contains both, so the finite-dimensional subcomodules of form a directed family under inclusion whose union is .
Depends on
- Commutative Hopf algebras over a field
- Field
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- Linear map between vector spaces over the same field
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme
- The tensor product $M\otimes_R N$ from the additive group underlying the free $\mathbb Z$-module on $M\times N$, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
- Vector space over a field
- Tensoring is right exact
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
Used by
- Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations Definition
- Expansion of a root-group translate of a weight vector Lemma
- Simple rational representations are finite-dimensional Lemma
- Trigonalizable groups, invariant flags and embeddings into Tₙ Lemma
- Modules generated by a primitive vector Proposition
- A finitely generated affine group scheme has a faithful finite-dimensional representation Theorem
- Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group Theorem
- Chevalley: every closed subgroup is a line stabilizer Theorem
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers Theorem
- Complete reducibility of rational modules in characteristic zero Theorem
- Lie-Kolchin: smooth connected solvable affine groups over algebraically closed fields are trigonalizable Theorem
- Semisimple groups in characteristic zero are linearly reductive Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Swanson (notes), J. Pevtsova (lecturer), Algebraic Groups Lecture Notes, University of Washington, Fall 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)