Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule

Statement

Let k be a field, let A be a commutative Hopf algebra over k (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field) and let (M,ρ) be an A-comodule (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme). For every finite subset S⊆M there is a finite-dimensional subcomodule N⊆M with S⊆N. Consequently M is the directed union of its finite-dimensional subcomodules. No basis of A and no choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The coaction satisfies (ρ⊗id⁡A)ρ=(id⁡M⊗Δ)ρ and (id⁡M⊗ε)ρ=id⁡M, and a subcomodule is a subspace N with ρ(N)⊆N⊗kA. (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Commutative Hopf algebras over a field)

[F2]

For k-vector spaces X,H, the tensor product is also the quotient of the free k-module on X×H by the k-span of the two additivity relations and e(cx,h)−ce(x,h), e(x,ch)−ce(x,h). Indeed this quotient has the bilinear universal property: extend a bilinear map by finite linear sums, which kill those relations. The resulting maps to and from the tensor product are inverse on spanning generators. (The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups)

[F3]

A finite spanning list yields a finite basis: if it is dependent, solve a nontrivial relation for a vector with nonzero coefficient and delete that vector, preserving the span; the length strictly decreases. A given independent list can be extended in the same finite span by appending a spanning-list vector only when it is outside the current span. (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S, Linear independence: a finite list v:n→V is independent when ∑i<nλivi=0V forces every λi=0F, and a subset S⊆V is independent when every injective finite list into S is independent, Linear subspace of a vector space)

Proof

Given: A field k, a commutative Hopf algebra A over k, an A-comodule (M,ρ) and a finite subset S⊆M.

1.1F2F3

(Coefficient criterion.) If h1,…,hn∈A are linearly independent and x1,…,xn lie in a k-vector space X with ∑ixi⊗hi=0 in X⊗kA, then x1=⋯=xn=0. Indeed, by [F2] the element ∑ie(xi,hi) of the free module on X×A is a finite k-linear combination of finitely many bilinearity generators; the spans X0⊆X and A0⊆A of the initial xi,hi together with all vectors occurring in that finite witness are finite-dimensional and the same combination exhibits ∑ixi⊗hi=0 in X0⊗kA0. Extend h1,…,hn to a finite basis v1,…,vN of A0 with vi=hi for i≤n, choose a finite basis u1,…,uM of X0, and use the universal property [F2] to identify X0⊗kA0 with the matrices kM×N by ua⊗vb↦Eab; the element ∑ixi⊗hi becomes the matrix whose i-th column is the coordinate vector of xi for i≤n and whose remaining columns vanish, so this matrix is zero and every xi is zero. The same argument shows that U⊗kH→X⊗kH is injective for any inclusion U⊆X: take a finite witness of a zero relation, extend a basis of the span of its original first factors in U to a basis of the finite ambient first-factor space, and compare the resulting tensor coordinates. Thus the subspace notation U⊗kH⊆X⊗kH is legitimate.

1.2F1F3

Let m∈M and write ρ(m)=∑i=1nmi⊗ai with a1,…,an linearly independent; such a representation exists by deleting redundant terms from a finite tensor expression, and then m=(id⁡M⊗ε)ρ(m)=∑iε(ai)mi by [F1]. Put N=span⁡(m,m1,…,mn), a finite-dimensional subspace of M containing m.

2.1F1F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

In the situation of step 1.2, let q ⁣:M→M/N be the quotient map. Applying q⊗id⁡A⊗id⁡A to the coassociativity identity [F1] for m gives ∑i(q⊗id⁡A)ρ(mi)⊗ai=∑i(qmi)⊗Δ(ai)=0, because mi∈N; since the ai are linearly independent, step 1.1 yields (q⊗id⁡A)ρ(mi)=0 for every i. The kernel of q⊗id⁡A is N⊗kA: one inclusion is clear, and if a finite sum ∑jxj⊗bj with linearly independent bj lies in that kernel, then ∑j(qxj)⊗bj=0, so step 1.1 gives qxj=0 and xj∈N for every j. Hence ρ(mi)∈N⊗kA for all i, and since mi∈N one also has ρ(m)=∑imi⊗ai∈N⊗kA; therefore ρ(N)⊆N⊗kA and N is a finite-dimensional subcomodule containing m.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra

For a finite set S={s1,…,sr}, apply step 2.1 to each sj to obtain finite-dimensional subcomodules Nj∋sj. The sum N=N1+⋯+Nr is finite-dimensional and contains S, and it is a subcomodule because ρ(Nj)⊆Nj⊗kA for each j gives ρ(N)⊆∑jNj⊗kA⊆N⊗kA.

4.1step 3.1F1∎

Consequently every element of M lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule, and for two such subcomodules N1,N2 their sum contains both, so the finite-dimensional subcomodules of M form a directed family under inclusion whose union is M.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources