Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Trigonalizable groups, invariant flags and embeddings into T_n

Statement

Let k be a field and let G be an affine algebraic group over k (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Group schemes of finite type over a field). Consider the following conditions:

(a) G is trigonalizable (Trigonalizable algebraic groups);

(b) every finite-dimensional rational representation of G admits a basis in which G acts through upper triangular matrices;

(c) G is isomorphic to a closed subgroup scheme of the upper triangular group scheme Tn=Dn⋉Un for some n (The upper unitriangular group scheme U_n and its coordinate ring);

(d) G contains a normal unipotent closed subgroup U (Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations) with G/U diagonalizable (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules).

Without a choice assumption, (a) is equivalent to (b), (d) implies (a), and quotients of trigonalizable groups are trigonalizable. Assuming the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) for the faithful-embedding and geometric kernel/image suppliers, all four conditions are equivalent; closed subgroups are then trigonalizable, and trigonalizability is preserved by extension of the base field. Only these embedding and geometric-conversion routes use AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and an affine algebraic group G over k; AC is assumed only for the embedding and geometric-conversion routes.

[F1]

G is trigonalizable when every simple rational representation of G has dimension one. (Trigonalizable algebraic groups)

[F2]

Assume AC. G has a faithful finite-dimensional representation, i.e. a monomorphism G→GLn, and every monomorphism of finite-type group schemes over a field is a closed immersion. (Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations, Finite-type algebraic group monomorphisms are closed immersions)

[F3]

Under AC for the geometric closed-subgroup conversion, Tn=Dn⋉Un is the upper triangular group scheme, Un is normal in Tn, Tn/Un≅Dn is diagonalizable, and Un is unipotent, so a closed subgroup of Tn intersected with Un is unipotent and its quotient embeds in Dn. (The upper unitriangular group scheme U_n and its coordinate ring, Unipotent groups are exactly the subgroups of some U_n, equivalently the groups with coconnected coordinate Hopf algebra)

[F4]

A diagonalizable group is trigonalizable, and a unipotent group is trigonalizable; every rational representation of a diagonalizable group is a choice-free direct sum of character eigenspaces, which may have arbitrary multiplicity. Every nonzero such representation contains a character line by taking a nonzero vector of a nonzero eigenspace; no simultaneous basis choice is used. (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules, Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, Trigonalizable algebraic groups)

[F5]

Every vector of a rational representation lies in a finite-dimensional subrepresentation. A simple rational representation is therefore finite-dimensional, and a nonzero finite-dimensional module has a simple submodule by minimizing the dimension of nonzero submodules. (Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule)

[F6]

Assume AC. A homomorphism of affine finite-type groups identifies its quotient by its scheme kernel with its closed scheme-theoretic image; quotients by closed normal affine subgroups are affine. A closed subgroup of a diagonalizable group is diagonalizable: its coordinate Hopf algebra is a quotient of k[M], hence is spanned by images of group-like elements. Distinct such images are linearly independent by the group-like argument of Distinct characters are linearly independent and eigenspace sums are direct, so this quotient is the group algebra of the quotient of M obtained by identifying equal images (Milne Theorem 12.9(c), printed pp. 233-234). (Group images are exact kernel quotients and preserve affine smooth connected properties, Quotients of affine group schemes by normal subgroup schemes are affine, Multiplicative type groups and Galois character modules)

Proof

Given: A field k and an affine algebraic group G over k; AC is assumed only for the embedding and geometric-conversion routes.

1.1F1

Assume (a), and let V be a nonzero finite-dimensional rational representation. By [F1] every simple subquotient of V is one-dimensional (and trivial or a character), so V contains a one-dimensional subrepresentation V1; by induction on dim⁡V the quotient V/V1 has a complete G-stable flag with one-dimensional successive quotients, and pulling it back along V→V/V1 and prepending V1 gives such a flag on V, i.e. a basis as in (b). Hence (a) implies (b).

1.2F2

Assume (b) and AC. By [F2] choose a faithful finite-dimensional representation G→GL(V); in a basis as in (b) it factors through Tn for n=dim⁡V, and the monomorphism G→Tn is a closed immersion by [F2]. Hence (b) implies (c).

1.3F3F6

Assume (c) and AC, so that G⊆Tn is a closed subgroup scheme. Put U=G∩Un; it is a closed subgroup of the unipotent group Un, hence unipotent, and it is normal in G because Un is normal in Tn. The diagonal homomorphism G→Dn has scheme kernel U; by [F6], its affine quotient G/U is its closed image in Dn and is diagonalizable. Hence (c) implies (d) under the specified AC premise.

1.4F4

Assume (d), and let S be a simple rational representation of G. The definition of unipotence gives a nonzero fixed vector in the nonzero restricted representation S∣U; the fixed subspace SU is nonzero and G-stable because U is normal. Since U acts trivially on SU, it is a representation of G/U, which is diagonalizable; the choice-free weight decomposition [F4] supplies a nonzero character eigenspace and hence a character line, and simplicity of S forces dim⁡S=1. Hence (d) implies (a).

2.1F5step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4

Conversely, (b) implies (a) without choice: a simple rational representation is finite-dimensional by [F5], and the first line of its triangular flag is a nonzero subrepresentation, hence is the whole representation. Together with step 1.1 this proves the choice-free equivalence (a) iff(b); step 1.4 proves the choice-free implication (d) implies(a). Steps1.2 and1.3 under AC complete the full equivalence.

3.1F6step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4∎

A quotient G/N is trigonalizable without choice because its simple representations pull back to simple representations of G: invariant subspaces are the same under the faithfully flat quotient. Assume AC for the remaining geometric routes. A closed subgroup H⊆G inherits the closed embedding G↪Tn from (c), and the proved implication (c) implies(d) implies(a) makes H trigonalizable. For any field extension k′/k, base change gives Gk′↪(Tn)k′, and the same implication over k′ gives trigonalizability. These arguments preserve all subgroup and field-extension claims with the local AC premise, without assuming that representations of H extend to G.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources