How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces
Statement
Let be a field and let be a diagonalizable group over , so that for an abelian group with group-like basis (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules). Then every rational representation of (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme) decomposes as a direct sum over the characters of of the corresponding eigenspaces. The eigenspaces may have arbitrary multiplicities. The decomposition is choice-free and is inherited by subrepresentations, quotients and the middle terms of extensions. In finite dimension, choosing finite bases of the nonzero eigenspaces expresses a representation as a finite direct sum of one-dimensional character representations; in particular is linearly reductive. Assuming the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), the same character-line decomposition holds in arbitrary dimension by Every vector space has a basis; only this last assertion uses arbitrary choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a diagonalizable group with , and a rational representation of .
For any abelian group , has basis , , , and . For arbitrary , use the same rational-representation convention as in the finite-type case: a natural family of group homomorphisms . A coaction is a linear map satisfying the counit and coassociativity identities. The correspondence in this generality is proved in step 1.1 below, rather than assumed from the finite-type suppliers. (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules, Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme)
For each , the explicit coordinate functional sends to . Applying extracts the coefficient of uniquely, without choosing a basis of . The sets are linear subspaces. (Linear subspace of a vector space)
The cited representation/comodule correspondence is stated for finite-type affine group schemes. The coefficient and universal-point argument below establishes the needed extension to with no finiteness restriction on . In a coaction, the counit identity gives whenever . (Rational representations of an affine group scheme are comodules of its coordinate Hopf algebra)
Assuming AC, every vector space has a basis (The Axiom of Choice, Every vector space has a basis). Finite-dimensional spaces have finite bases without arbitrary choice.
Proof
Given: A field , a diagonalizable group with character group , and a comodule .
The correspondence holds for arbitrary . Given a natural action , evaluate it at the universal point and put . Naturality along gives . At the identity action yields the counit identity. In the two points and have product ; evaluating at yields . Conversely this coassociativity identity makes the displayed formula for multiplicative; the counit gives the identity and gives its inverse. These constructions are inverse by evaluation at , and a subspace is stable under all exactly when it is a subcomodule, by the same evaluation. No finite-type hypothesis or basis of is used. Finally, the group-like elements of are exactly : if is group-like, comparing coefficients in gives and for , while gives ; over a field exactly one coefficient is . Thus .
For write with , a finite sum by [F1]. Applying and to this expression and using coassociativity gives and , so comparing the coefficients of the basis elements of in these two expressions gives for every : indeed the coefficient of with vanishes on the right and equals the -component of on the left, and the remaining coefficient identifies the -component of with .
The counit identity of [F3] applied to the expansion of [step 1.2] gives with each . Hence . If is a finite relation with , applying gives ; extraction by gives for every . Thus the sum is direct.
If is a subrepresentation, coefficient extraction in gives . An equivariant linear map preserves every weight, so a quotient has its corresponding weight decomposition; the middle term of any extension has the decomposition of step 2.1. No eigenspace is asserted to have dimension one. If is finite-dimensional, there are finitely many nonzero eigenspaces and choosing their finite bases expresses as a finite direct sum of character lines. Thus finite-dimensional representations are semisimple and is linearly reductive.
For an arbitrary-dimensional , assume AC and choose a basis of each nonzero simultaneously by [F4]. Their union is a basis of by the direct sum decomposition, and its one-dimensional spans are character representations. This proves the additional arbitrary-dimensional character-line assertion, with AC spent only in these basis choices.
Depends on
Used by
- Roots and root groups of a split reductive group Definition
- Split reductive groups Definition
- Weights, dominant weights and the highest-weight order of a rational representation Definition
- The simple modules of SL₂ and its fundamental representation Example
- Cartan subgroups: conjugacy, density and normalizers Lemma
- Centre, radical and semisimple quotient of a reductive group Lemma
- Dominant characters of a torus times a split semisimple group are primitive weights Lemma
- Fixed loci and centralizers of torus actions are connected Lemma
- Groups of multiplicative type are linearly reductive Lemma
- Trigonalizable groups, invariant flags and embeddings into Tₙ Lemma
- Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group Theorem
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers Theorem
- Cocharacter limit subgroups Theorem
- Complete reducibility of rational modules in characteristic zero Theorem
- Conjugacy of diagonalizable complements and maximal subgroups under smoothness hypotheses Theorem
- Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions Theorem
- Weight subgroups of a torus action Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)