How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Split reductive groups
Definition
A split reductive group over is a pair consisting of a reductive algebraic group over (Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups) and a maximal torus that is split, i.e. isomorphic over to for some (Groups of multiplicative type and tori, Borel subgroups, maximal tori and Borel pairs).
The following supplemental existence and field-invariance facts assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) through their cited suppliers. Since maximal tori exist, any torus lies in one, and maximality is preserved by field extension (Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups), the rank and the semisimple rank are well defined. A homomorphism of split reductive groups is a homomorphism of algebraic groups carrying into . Because is affine of finite type, the adjoint representation (The adjoint representation of an affine group scheme, The Lie bracket from infinitesimals and the adjoint action) restricts to a rational representation of on , to which the eigenspace decomposition of diagonalizable groups applies (Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces). We write , for the lattices of Character and cocharacter lattices of a split torus. Every reductive group splits over a finite separable extension of the base field; the split hypothesis is kept throughout.
Under this same assumption, the rank of is the common dimension of its maximal tori and the semisimple rank is the rank of the semisimple quotient ; both are additive invariants of the pair. The split hypothesis is exactly the requirement that the geometric character lattice have trivial -action; it is always a free -module of finite rank, and . The equivalence with splitting is Multiplicative type groups and Galois character modules, which is why the root datum of is defined over rather than only over a finite extension. A homomorphism of split reductive groups need not carry isomorphically onto ; the induced map on character lattices is then only a homomorphism. An isogeny carrying onto induces an injective character-lattice map with finite cokernel, by the split character anti-equivalence (Split diagonalizable groups are dual to abelian groups); it need not induce an isomorphism even if the two groups have the same abstract root datum. For example, the isogeny of in characteristic induces multiplication by on its character lattice .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Split diagonalizable groups are dual to abelian groups
- Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups
- Groups of multiplicative type and tori
- Borel subgroups, maximal tori and Borel pairs
- Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups
- Character and cocharacter lattices of a split torus
- The adjoint representation of an affine group scheme
- The Lie bracket from infinitesimals and the adjoint action
- Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces
- Multiplicative type groups and Galois character modules
Used by
- Roots and root groups of a split reductive group Definition
- The induced coordinate module E(lambda) Definition
- The root datum of a split reductive group Definition
- Weights, dominant weights and the highest-weight order of a rational representation Definition
- Central characters and descent along a central isogeny Lemma
- Centre, radical and semisimple quotient of a reductive group Lemma
- Connected groups of rank zero are unipotent Lemma
- Dominant characters of a torus times a split semisimple group are primitive weights Lemma
- Every dominant character of a split reductive group is a highest weight Lemma
- Every dominant weight of a split semisimple group is a primitive weight Lemma
- Semisimple groups are perfect and have no nontrivial characters Lemma
- The Lie algebra of a semisimple group in characteristic zero is semisimple Lemma
- The highest-weight classification does not imply semisimplicity in positive characteristic Remark
- Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one Theorem
- Cocharacter limit subgroups Theorem
- Rank-one connected groups Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes (SGA 3 summer school, Luminy; Panoramas et Syntheses) (standard reference, not scraped)