Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let (G,T) be a split reductive group over k of semisimple rank 1 (Split reductive groups). Then there exists a homomorphism v:(SL2,T2)→(G,T) with central kernel, and every such homomorphism is a central isogeny from SL2 onto the derived group G′; any two differ by the inner automorphism defined by an element of (NSL2(T2)/μ2)(k). Moreover v maps U± isomorphically onto the root groups of Φ(G,T), and for either chosen root α, if T1=(T∩G′)t is the unique maximal torus of the derived group contained in T, then there is a unique cocharacter α∨∈X∗(T1) with ⟨α,α∨⟩=2. In particular the two root groups generate G′, which is isomorphic to SL2 or PGL2; together with T they generate G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a split reductive group (G,T) of semisimple rank 1.

[F1]

G/R(G) is semisimple of rank 1, G=Z(G)t⋅G′ is an almost-direct product with Z(G)t∩G′ finite, and G′ is semisimple (Centre, radical and semisimple quotient of a reductive group, The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups, Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group).

[F2]

For a split reductive group of semisimple rank one, the adjoint quotient is PGL2 and the quotient map has kernel Z(G) (Milne, Theorem 20.22). The map SL2→PGL2 is the universal central covering; a central covering of PGL2 admits a lift from SL2 (Rank-one connected groups, Structure of SL_2 and root coordinates).

[F3]

(T∩G′)t is a maximal torus of G′ and T=(T∩G′)t⋅Z(G)t (Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups); quotients by finite central subgroups are representable (Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

By [F1] and [F3], G′ is split semisimple of rank one with split maximal torus T1=(T∩G′)t. The exact adjoint quotient of [F2] is q:G→PGL2 with kernel Z(G). Since G=Z(G)tG′ and q kills the central torus, q(G′)=PGL2. The centre of semisimple G′ is finite by [F1], so the restriction G′→PGL2 has finite central kernel and is a central isogeny. Choose q up to an inner automorphism of PGL2 so that q(T) is its diagonal torus; split maximal tori of PGL2 are conjugate over k, as proved in Milne20.31. The universal-cover input [F2] then lifts the standard SL2→PGL2 to a central isogeny v0:SL2→G′ carrying T2 onto T1, as in the exact pair lift of Milne20.32. Composing with G′↪G gives the required v. Its kernel is a subgroup of μ2, hence is 1 or μ2; thus G′ is SL2 or PGL2. This is the central-cover proof, without invoking the later classification by arbitrary root data. It includes characteristic two and its nonreduced kernel.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For any homomorphism v with central kernel, that kernel is a subgroup scheme of Z(SL2)=μ2, hence is finite. Perfectness puts its image in G′, and equality of dimensions makes the image all of G′. Thus v is a central isogeny, with kernel either 1 or μ2. If v,w are two such maps, their kernels agree and their induced identifications of the same central quotient with G′ differ by an automorphism; the universal central cover lifts this automorphism to SL2. Since both maps carry T2 onto T1, the lift preserves T2. Automorphisms of the split pair (SL2,T2) are precisely conjugations by elements of (NSL2(T2)/μ2)(k), proving the asserted uniqueness.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The central quotient restricts to isomorphisms on the upper and lower unipotent subgroups: its kernel μ2 meets either subgroup scheme trivially, as is seen from the matrix coordinates, and the standard maps identify these subgroups with the two root groups of PGL2. Thus v(U±) are the root groups of (G,T), with the two signs possibly interchanged. The rank-one lattice X∗(T1) maps injectively to Z by λ↦⟨α,λ⟩. For the chosen root α, choose the sign of the standard cocharacter so that its image under v has pairing 2; it is the required α∨, and injectivity proves uniqueness. In the simply connected case α=2χ and α∨=χ∨; in the adjoint case α=χ and α∨=2χ∨. Since U± generate SL2, their images generate G′. Finally T=T1Z(G)t and G=Z(G)tG′ by [F1] and [F3], so T and the two root groups generate G.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources