How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Centre, radical and semisimple quotient of a reductive group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a reductive algebraic group over (Split reductive groups) and let be a maximal torus of . Then: (a) for every maximal torus , and is of multiplicative type (Groups of multiplicative type and tori); (b) is the largest subtorus of (not the full possibly nonreduced neutral component), its formation commutes with every extension of the base field, and the quotient is semisimple; (c) has trivial centre; (d) the semisimple rank of equals ; (e) with the derived subgroup (The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups), is finite, and the multiplication map is surjective with finite kernel, and is semisimple; (f) is semisimple iff iff is finite. The quotient is the represented normal affine quotient (Quotients of affine group schemes by normal subgroup schemes are affine); it is smooth and connected by Affine smooth and connected properties in exact sequences of algebraic groups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, reductive over arbitrary , and a maximal torus ; denotes the largest torus subgroup of the scheme-theoretic centre.
Reductive means smooth connected affine with trivial geometric unipotent radical. The radical and unipotent radical are the largest smooth connected normal solvable and unipotent subgroup varieties. Smooth connected solvable groups over an algebraically closed field have a decomposition . (Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups, Split reductive groups, Maximal tori of a smooth connected solvable group are conjugate)
Derived subgroups of smooth connected groups are smooth connected and characteristic, and their quotients are commutative. Normal affine quotients are represented affine fppf quotients; quotients and homomorphic images of smooth connected groups are smooth connected. Reductions of normal subgroups in a smooth group over a perfect field are subgroup varieties, with normal reduced neutral component. (Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group, The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups, Quotients of affine group schemes by normal subgroup schemes are affine, Affine smooth and connected properties in exact sequences of algebraic groups, Group images are exact kernel quotients and preserve affine smooth connected properties, Reduced identity components over perfect fields)
Maximal tori remain maximal under any field extension. In a reductive group the centralizer of a maximal torus is that torus, and centralizers commute with field extension. (Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups, Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers)
A closed subgroup of a torus is of multiplicative type. The largest subtorus of a multiplicative-type group with geometric character module corresponds to ; it commutes with every field extension, and its quotient has finite character group. Diagonalizable character duality and the Galois character-module correspondence give these assertions also for nonsplit groups. (Multiplicative type groups and Galois character modules, Split diagonalizable groups are dual to abelian groups, Groups of multiplicative type and tori)
Multiplicative-type rigidity: a connected group acts trivially by group automorphisms on a torus. More generally if is central in and are of multiplicative type, every action of a connected group on preserving is trivial (Milne12.36–12.41). The proof first fixes both factors; then descends to a homomorphism , whose family is constant in by rigidity, hence the identity. A commutative extension of multiplicative-type groups is of multiplicative type (Milne12.22).
The precise extra source input for the product assertion is semisimple perfectness (Milne21.49–21.50), used as in12.46(b). Over algebraically closed , the source root groups generate a semisimple group: the rank-one identities express coroot torus elements as products of root-group elements, and the roots span the rational character space. Each root subgroup lies in a perfect rank-one subgroup (source20.24), so their generated group equals its derived subgroup. Perfectness descends by field extension and is equivalent to having no nontrivial commutative quotient. This source-backed input preserves the full product statement without a cycle through its later local semisimple-perfectness consumer.
Under AC affine finite-type groups have faithful finite-dimensional representations. A split torus decomposes such a representation into finitely many character-weight spaces, each with arbitrary finite multiplicity; for a nonsplit torus this decomposition is used only after passage to an algebraic closure. A character of a group kills its derived subgroup, because its commutator morphism is trivial. (Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations, Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups)
Proof
Given: AC and reductive over .
By [F3], for every maximal torus, and the scheme centre lies in each such centralizer. Hence . By [F4] the centre is of multiplicative type, proving (a). Its largest torus is central, smooth connected normal and solvable, so lies in . Conversely pass to algebraic closure. The unipotent radical of the smooth connected solvable group is characteristic there and normal in : conjugation preserves it on points by uniqueness, and smoothness makes this pointwise inclusion scheme-theoretic. Reductivity forces it to be trivial. Solvable splitting [F1] therefore makes a torus, so is a torus. Rigidity [F5] makes it central, hence . Thus .
Put . We prove finite without asserting smoothness of this intersection. Over algebraic closure take a faithful representation of and its central-torus weight decomposition . Since is central, each weight block is -stable. Its determinant is a character of , hence trivial on ; on it is , where . Faithfulness makes the finitely many generate the character lattice of by [F4]. The subgroup generated by their multiples has finite index: a common positive multiple of all times the full lattice lies in it. Hence the subgroup killed by all these determinant characters is finite, and contains . This proves finiteness over , including infinitesimal kernels.
The centre is defined by commuting equations and commutes with field extension. By [F4], so does its largest torus, and therefore so does by step1.1. For , a smooth connected normal solvable subgroup in pulls back to a smooth connected normal solvable subgroup of : its kernel is the smooth central torus , and solvability is closed under extensions by pulling back derived series. Radical maximality forces the inverse image to equal , so the subgroup in is trivial. Thus is semisimple. Existence, affineness, smoothness and connectedness of this quotient follow from [F2]. This proves (b).
A finite central quotient of a smooth connected semisimple group is semisimple. Indeed over algebraic closure, the inverse image of its radical is an extension of a solvable group by a finite central commutative group, hence solvable. Its smooth connected reduced neutral component is normal in the semisimple source by [F2] and is therefore trivial. The finite quotient morphism preserves dimension, so the radical in the quotient has dimension zero and is trivial because smooth connected. Apply this to , whose kernel is finite by [F4]. Thus is semisimple, in particular reductive, and its centre is of multiplicative type by step1.1 applied to this quotient.
Since , its quotient is a torus in . If a larger torus existed, its inverse image would be a smooth connected extension of tori with central kernel . Rigidity [F5] makes this extension commutative and of multiplicative type, hence a torus properly containing , a contradiction. Thus is maximal. Consequently the semisimple rank is , since is finite. This proves (d).
Over algebraic closure the radical is preserved by conjugation from by uniqueness, and this gives scheme normality because and are smooth. Thus it lies in , finite by step 1.2. Smooth connectedness then forces . The derived subgroup is smooth connected by [F2], so it is semisimple over . Now is semisimple and perfect by [F6]. The closed normal image of in this quotient has commutative quotient, because commutators lift fppf-locally to and land in . Perfectness makes that image the entire quotient. Therefore and multiplication is a surjective homomorphism with kernel , finite by step 1.2. This proves all of (e).
Let be the inverse image in of . It is normal, with central kernel and multiplicative-type quotient by step 3.1. The conjugation action of connected on is trivial by [F5], so . Its quotient is therefore trivial: has trivial scheme centre, proving (c).
By definition, semisimplicity means the geometric radical is trivial. Step2.1 identifies it with , so this is equivalent to . By step1.1 and [F4] this occurs exactly when has dimension zero, equivalently is finite. Thus (f) holds. The distinction from the full neutral centre is essential: in characteristic , is semisimple with centre , connected and nonreduced, while its largest central torus and radical are trivial.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Split reductive groups
- Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups
- Maximal tori of a smooth connected solvable group are conjugate
- Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group
- The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups
- Quotients of affine group schemes by normal subgroup schemes are affine
- Affine smooth and connected properties in exact sequences of algebraic groups
- Group images are exact kernel quotients and preserve affine smooth connected properties
- Reduced identity components over perfect fields
- Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers
- Multiplicative type groups and Galois character modules
- Split diagonalizable groups are dual to abelian groups
- Groups of multiplicative type and tori
- Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations
- Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces
Used by
- The Lie algebra and root system do not determine the root datum Counterexample
- The root datum of a split reductive group Definition
- Central characters and descent along a central isogeny Lemma
- Every dominant character of a split reductive group is a highest weight Lemma
- Multiples of the fundamental weights are primitive weights in the semisimple case Lemma
- Semisimple groups are perfect and have no nontrivial characters Lemma
- Structure of SL₂ and root coordinates Lemma
- The Lie algebra of a semisimple group in characteristic zero is semisimple Lemma
- Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one Theorem
- Complete reducibility of rational modules in characteristic zero Theorem
- Rank-one connected groups Theorem
- Root subgroups of a split reductive group Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups.
Dependency tree · two levels
80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)