Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cited smoothness, quotient and reduction suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Let k be a field and let G be an affine algebraic group over k (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Group schemes of finite type over a field) with derived subgroup DG as in The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups. Then:

(a) DG is a closed normal characteristic subgroup scheme of G, and G/DG is commutative;

(b) if G is smooth then DG is smooth, and if G is connected then DG is connected;

(c) every closed subgroup scheme H⊆G containing DG is normal in G;

(d) for every k-algebra R the abstract derived subgroup [G(R),G(R)] is contained in (DG)(R), and if G is smooth over an algebraically closed field k then (DG)(k)=[G(k),G(k)];

(e) if G is smooth, connected and solvable with G≠1, then DG≠G, so dim⁡DG<dim⁡G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k and an affine algebraic group G over k.

[F1]

DG is the smallest closed subgroup scheme through which the commutator morphism c:G×kG→G, (g,h)↦ghg−1h−1, factors; equivalently DG is the closed subgroup scheme generated by the image of c. A subgroup scheme N is normal when conjugation G×kN→G factors through N. (The derived subgroup, the derived series and solvable algebraic groups)

[F2]

Assume AC. Connected finite-type group schemes are geometrically connected; smooth connected groups are geometrically integral; geometrically reduced finite-type group schemes are smooth. (Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected)

[F3]

For a smooth affine group over an algebraically closed field, the abstract commutator subgroup of its rational points equals the rational points of its derived subgroup. Milne Proposition 6.20 proves this using iterated commutator images, constructibility, and a dense open subset of the generated group (printed pp. 130-131). This source statement is used only for clause (d), not to infer smoothness of an image of the commutator morphism.

[F4]

Dimension is measured by chains of irreducible closed subsets. Appending a nonempty irreducible ambient finite-dimensional space to a chain in a proper closed subset proves the strict dimension inequality. (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention)

[F5]

Assume AC. The quotient by a closed normal subgroup is a separated finite-type group scheme with faithfully flat projection and the given subgroup as its scheme-theoretic kernel. It represents the fppf coset sheaf. (Normal subgroup quotients of finite-type group schemes exist as fppf scheme quotients)

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the cited suppliers and is the axiom of The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: AC, a field k and an affine algebraic group G over k.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Write A=O(G) and let cn:G2n→G send its arguments to a product of n commutators. Put I=⋂n≥1ker⁡(cn∗:A→A⊗2n) and B=A/I. The induced maps from B to the target rings are jointly injective. Their pairwise tensor products are jointly injective on B⊗kB: for a finite tensor expression, restrict to the finite-dimensional spans of its factors; joint injectivity supplies finitely many separating coefficient functionals on each span. For f∈I, every such tensor map kills Δ(f) because composing multiplication with cn×cm is cn+m. Hence Δ(I)⊆I⊗A+A⊗I. Inversion reverses a commutator product and replaces each commutator by the one with its two arguments exchanged, so S(I)⊆I; evaluation at the identity gives ε(I)=0. Thus I is a Hopf ideal. The group Spec⁡B contains the commutator morphism, and any closed subgroup containing it contains every cn, so its defining Hopf ideal lies in I. Therefore DG=Spec⁡B.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

For any field extension K/k, express an element of A⊗kK as a finite sum ∑iai⊗λi with the λi linearly independent over k. All cn∗ kill this element exactly when they kill every ai, so the joint kernel after extension is I⊗kK. If G is smooth, every target (A⊗2n)⊗kK is reduced, and their jointly injected subalgebra B⊗kK is reduced. Thus DG is geometrically reduced and smooth by [F2]. If G is connected, its geometric connectedness in [F2] makes each finite product G2n connected. For an idempotent b∈B, every cn∗(b) is an idempotent on the connected affine scheme G2n, hence a scalar 0 or 1. Evaluation at the identity shows that all these scalars equal ε(b). Joint injectivity of the maps from B then gives b=ε(b), so B has no nontrivial idempotents and DG is connected. This proves (b), without treating c as a group homomorphism or identifying a scheme-generated closure with a union of underlying images.

2.2F1F3step 1.1

For every k-algebra R the commutator of any two G(R)-points lies in (DG)(R), since c factors through DG; hence [G(R),G(R)]⊆(DG)(R). Under the additional hypotheses of (d), [F3] gives equality. If DG⊆H⊆G, the identity ghg−1=[g,h]h for g∈G(R),h∈H(R) proves H(R) stable under conjugation for every R, which is scheme-theoretic normality. In particular DG is normal. This proves (c) and (d).

3.1F1F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

The quotient G/DG exists by [F5]. Its commutator is trivial after pullback along the faithfully flat product cover G×G→(G/DG)×(G/DG), because the commutator of G lands in its kernel; faithfully flat descent therefore makes the quotient commutative. The independent-coefficient argument of step 2.1 also works with an arbitrary k-algebra in place of K, considered as a k-vector space. Thus the description by the cn commutes with such base changes. Every automorphism of GR preserves commutator products and their generated closed subgroup, so it preserves (DG)R. Hence DG is characteristic as well as closed and normal, proving (a).

4.1A1F1F2F4step 2.1∎

If smooth connected solvable G≠1 satisfied DG=G, every term of its derived series would equal G, contradicting termination at 1. Therefore DG≠G. The group G is geometrically integral by [F2], and DG is a nonempty proper closed subgroup; [F4] gives dim⁡DG<dim⁡G. This proves (e) and all clauses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources