Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Splitting trigonalizable extensions: algebraically closed fields and two perfect-field cases

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a perfect field and let G be a trigonalizable algebraic group over k (Trigonalizable algebraic groups) with largest normal unipotent subgroup Gu and diagonalizable quotient G/Gu (Groups of multiplicative type and tori). Then the extension 1→Gu→G→G/Gu→1 splits in each of the following cases: (a) k is algebraically closed; (b) k is perfect and Gu is smooth and connected; (c) k is perfect and G/Gu is connected. In particular a smooth connected trigonalizable group over an algebraically closed field is a semidirect product Gu⋊T for a maximal torus T, and all maximal tori are conjugate by an element of Gu(k).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a perfect field k, and a trigonalizable affine algebraic k-group G with largest normal unipotent subgroup Gu and diagonalizable quotient D=G/Gu.

[F1]

Assume AC. There is a normal series G⊇G0=Gu⊇G1⊇⋯⊇Gr=1 of closed subgroup schemes normal in G in which every quotient Gi/Gi+1 is embedded D-equivariantly into Ga with a linear action of D; in particular the last nontrivial term N satisfies N⊆Gu, N is a closed subgroup scheme of Ga, and the conjugation action of D on N is the restriction of a linear action on Ga. (Trigonalizable groups have a normal series with a multiplicative quotient and additive subgroup quotients)

[F2]

Assume AC. If G is smooth and connected over a perfect field, Gu is smooth connected and has a series of smooth connected subgroups normal in G with successive quotients Ga. This is the current Unipotent radicals of smooth connected trigonalizable groups over perfect fields have normal G_a series. It is used below only for smooth ambient groups; reductions of subgroups are not assumed normal in a nonsmooth acting group.

[F3]

If N⊆Gu is a closed normal subgroup scheme of G, then G/N is a trigonalizable affine algebraic group with (G/N)u=Gu/N and (G/N)/(Gu/N)≅D: quotients of trigonalizable groups are trigonalizable (simple representations of the quotient are representations of G), quotients and closed subgroups of unipotent groups are unipotent, a normal unipotent closed subgroup of G/N pulls back to a normal unipotent closed subgroup of G lying in Gu, and the quotient of an affine group by a closed normal subgroup scheme is affine. (Trigonalizable algebraic groups, Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations, Unipotent groups are exactly the subgroups of some U_n, equivalently the groups with coconnected coordinate Hopf algebra, Quotients of affine group schemes by normal subgroup schemes are affine)

[F4]

Splitting of extensions by subgroups of Ga (Milne Theorem 15.34): let M be an algebraic group of multiplicative type over k acting by group automorphisms on a closed subgroup scheme N⊆Ga, and let 1→N→E→M→1 be an extension of affine algebraic groups inducing this action. Then the extension splits in each of the cases (a) N≅Ga and the action of M on N is linear; (b) k is perfect and N≅αpr; (c) N is étale and M is connected; (d) k is algebraically closed and the action is the restriction of a linear action on Ga. Case (a) is the local Extensions of multiplicative-type groups by a one-dimensional vector group with a linear action split; cases (b)-(d) are Milne 15.34(b)-(d), printed pp. 319-320.

[F5]

Vector and primitive-module inputs. A smooth connected commutative unipotent group in characteristic zero is a vector group (Milne Corollary14.33); over a perfect field of characteristic p, one killed by p is a vector group (Proposition14.54). In characteristic p, primitive elements in k[x1,…,xn] are the sums ∑i,jaijxipj. With Fc=cpF, the skew polynomial ring B=k[F] acts on primitives by Ff=fp; when k is perfect, degree division makes B a left and right Euclidean ring. Milne Theorem14.46 and its preceding proofs identify elementary unipotent groups contravariantly with finitely generated left B-modules; in particular P(Gan)=Bn, and an exact sequence of these modules gives the reversed exact sequence of group schemes. These exact source inputs are applied to the explicitly diagonalizable quotient D in this theorem, so weight decompositions are over k, including nonsmooth D. Derived subgroups are characteristic after every base change, and a smooth connected group has smooth connected derived subgroup. (Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group) A diagonalizable group is linearly reductive, and its positive Hochschild cohomology with linear vector coefficients vanishes. A homomorphism has closed image isomorphic to its quotient by the scheme-theoretic kernel; smooth connected homomorphic images and quotients remain smooth connected. (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules, Groups of multiplicative type are linearly reductive, Higher Hochschild cohomology vanishes for linearly reductive groups, Group images are exact kernel quotients and preserve affine smooth connected properties, Affine smooth and connected properties in exact sequences of algebraic groups)

[F6]

In characteristic zero a finite closed subgroup scheme of Ga is trivial. In characteristic p>0, finite closed subgroup schemes of Ga over a perfect field are classified by their connected-étale sequence: N sits in 1→N∘→N→Net→1 with N∘≅αpr (possibly trivial) and Net finite étale (possibly trivial). If M is connected, its action on the étale group Net is trivial, because the automorphism functor of a finite étale group scheme is étale, so a morphism into it from the connected group M is constant, equal to the identity at the origin. (Milne, Exercise 14-3 and the connected-étale sequence; recorded as a source fact.)

[F7]

Sections of a split extension with commutative kernel correspond to crossed homomorphisms; principal crossed homomorphisms correspond to conjugation by a kernel k-point. The local principal-cocycle result applies to a smooth diagonalizable group over an algebraically closed field with smooth commutative unipotent coefficients, in particular a torus acting on Ga. A unipotent subgroup intersects a torus trivially. No principal-cocycle assertion for nonsmooth diagonalizable sources and infinitesimal coefficients is made. (Crossed homomorphisms, principal crossed homomorphisms and Hochschild extensions, Smooth diagonalizable groups over algebraically closed fields have only principal cocycles into smooth commutative unipotent groups, A subgroup that is both unipotent and diagonalizable is trivial)

[F8]

Affine torsors and extensions. A torsor under Gan on an affine scheme is trivial by the additive torsor proof applied componentwise: on an affine fppf trivializing cover its transition vector is an Amitsur cocycle; each coordinate is a coboundary, and translating a local section by the resulting vector makes its two pullbacks agree. The descent supplier then gives a global section, and the shear map gives a trivialization. Therefore it has a scheme section. A scheme section of an extension with commutative kernel makes it a Hochschild extension; the extension splits when its class in H2 vanishes. For a short exact sequence of commutative coefficient group functors, a long exact sequence exists when the maps on represented cochains are surjective in every degree. (Torsors under the additive group over an affine scheme are trivial, Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions, Crossed homomorphisms, principal crossed homomorphisms and Hochschild extensions)

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a perfect field k, and a trigonalizable affine algebraic k-group G with D=G/Gu.

1.1F1F3induction

In cases (a) and (c), induct on the length of the original series in [F1]. The base Gu=1 is the isomorphism G→D. Otherwise take its last nontrivial term N and apply [F3] to G/N. Its shorter series gives a section sˉ:D→G/N by induction. The pullback E=G×G/ND is an extension of D by N with the linear action on the additive embedding from [F1]. A section of E→D composes with E→G to split the original extension.

1.2F5construct

To handle case (b), first prove a coefficient lemma: over perfect k, every action of the given diagonalizable D on a vector group N admits an exact sequence 0→N→V→Q→0 in which V and Q are vector groups with linear D-actions. In characteristic zero, additive polynomials are linear, so N itself is a linear representation and one may take V=N,Q=0. In characteristic p, write P(N)=Bn as in [F5]. Decompose its coordinate primitives into their finitely many D-weight components. These components remain primitive and generate P(N) over B, since their sums are the original coordinates. Give a finite free module L=⨁i=1mBei the corresponding weights and map ei to these primitive generators. Its kernel R is a D-stable B-submodule; Frobenius sends weight χ to weight pχ.

1.3F5F3given

In case (b), induct on dim⁡Gu, with Gu=1 as base. If Gu≠1, its unipotence gives a terminating derived series. Let A be its last nontrivial derived term. It is characteristic in Gu, smooth connected by the current derived-subgroup lemma, and commutative. In characteristic zero take N=A, a vector group by [F5]. In characteristic p, the embedding into an upper unitriangular group shows ptA=1 for large t, because (1+M)pt=1 once pt exceeds the matrix size. Take the last nontrivial image N=pjA. Multiplication by pj is a homomorphism on commutative A, so N is smooth connected by [F5], and it is killed by p, hence a vector group by Proposition14.54 in [F5]. Derived terms and these natural multiplication images are characteristic after every base change, so N is normal in G. It is positive-dimensional: a nontrivial smooth geometrically connected zero-dimensional group is trivial, and all chosen groups are smooth connected.

2.1F4F6step 1.1discharge-induction

In case (a), F4 splits this pullback, including finite or infinitesimal N. In case (c), if N=Ga its given linear action permits F4. Otherwise N is finite; [F6] gives its connected-étale sequence with connected part αpr. Quotient the pullback by that connected part. Its extension by the étale quotient splits by F4, since D is connected. Pull back along that section; F4 splits the remaining extension by αpr. Thus the original pullback splits in both cases and completes the series-length induction.

2.2F5step 1.2algebra

The kernel R has a homogeneous free B-basis. To see this, choose a weight-homogeneous element with a nonzero first coordinate of least possible F-degree. In reducing the first coordinate of any homogeneous relation by its leading monomial, multiplication of the pivot by aFj has exactly the target weight: the matching leading coordinates have weights pj+dχ1. Thus each subtraction remains homogeneous. A nonzero remainder of smaller first-coordinate degree would contradict minimality, so the coordinate is eliminated. The pivot generates a direct free summand of R, and repeat on the submodule with first coordinate zero and the remaining coordinates. There are only m coordinates, so this gives a finite homogeneous free basis, treating a coordinate identically zero by skipping it. Nonhomogeneous relations are finite sums of weight components and are reduced componentwise. Apply the exact primitive-module equivalence of [F5] to 0→R→L→P(N)→0. It gives 0→N→V→Q→0, and the homogeneous bases of L and R make both V and Q linear vector representations of D. This proves the coefficient lemma over k itself.

3.1F8F5step 2.2

The quotient V→Q is an N-torsor. Since N is a vector group as an underlying group, [F8] makes it trivial over affine Q. More generally every map Dj→Q lifts to V, because its pullback is a vector-group torsor on the affine scheme Dj; this also holds for j=0 and for nonreduced Dj. Thus 0→C∙(D,N)→C∙(D,V)→C∙(D,Q)→0 is exact, even though the action on N may be nonlinear. The long exact sequence in [F8] contains H1(D,Q)→H2(D,N)→H2(D,V). Its outer groups vanish by [F5], since V,Q are linear, so H2(D,N)=0. Any extension of D by N is an N-torsor over affine D, hence has a scheme section by [F8]; the resulting Hochschild class is zero, so the extension splits. This establishes splitting for vector kernels with arbitrary actions, without asserting linearity of the full automorphism functor.

4.1F3F5step 3.1step 1.3discharge-induction

The quotient G/N has smooth connected unipotent radical Gu/N of smaller dimension and the same diagonalizable quotient D, by [F3] and [F5]. The induction hypothesis splits it. Pull back G→G/N along a section as in step1.1. This is an extension of D by the vector group N, with its actual conjugation action; this action need not be linear. Step 3.1 nevertheless splits it and hence splits G→D. This proves case (b), including nonsmooth diagonalizable D, and completes the dimension induction.

5.1F2F8F7F5step 4.1induction

Now assume k algebraically closed and G smooth connected. By [F2], Gu is smooth connected; its quotient D is smooth connected of multiplicative type, hence a torus. Step 4.1 gives a section s:D→G. Any two sections are Gu(k)-conjugate: induct on dim⁡Gu, taking a last normal N≅Ga from [F2]. Their images in G/N are conjugate by induction. Lift the conjugating point of (Gu/N)(k) to Gu(k), because its fibre is a Ga-torsor on affine Spec⁡k and is trivial by [F8], and conjugate to make these quotient sections equal. Their ratio is then a crossed homomorphism D→N. Here D is a smooth torus and N=Ga is smooth, so [F7] makes the ratio principal and conjugation by an element of N(k) identifies the sections. The base Gu=1 has a unique section.

6.1F7F5F3step 5.1

Let T be any torus in G. Since T∩Gu=1 by [F7], its image S=q(T)⊆D is a subtorus and q∣T:T→S is an isomorphism onto that image. The preimage G′=q−1(S) is smooth connected, with unipotent radical Gu and quotient S: the kernel and quotient are smooth connected, so the exact-sequence supplier [F5] applies. The two sections of G′→S given by T and s∣S are Gu(k)-conjugate by the section-conjugacy argument of step 5.1. Hence T lies in a conjugate of the complement s(D). If T is maximal, it equals that conjugate, so it is itself a complement; no dimension equality between unrelated maximal tori is assumed.

7.1step 2.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1∎

Thus every maximal torus is the image of a section of q, and multiplication identifies G with Gu⋊T for each of them. Step 5.1 makes any two such tori conjugate by Gu(k). Together with steps 1.1–2.2 and 1.3–4.1 this proves all three splitting cases and the full smooth connected torus conclusion. No nonsmooth-source/infinitesimal-coefficient section-conjugacy assertion is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources