How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations
Definition
Let be a field and let be an affine algebraic group over , that is, an affine group scheme of finite type over (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Group schemes of finite type over a field).
(a) Unipotent representations. A finite-dimensional rational representation of (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Vector space over a field) is unipotent if there is a -basis of (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis) such that, for every commutative -algebra and every , the operator on is upper triangular with all diagonal entries equal to in the scalar-extended basis. Equivalently, by the comodule dictionary, is unipotent if and only if has a complete -stable flag with acting trivially on each quotient ; the equivalence uses that a complete flag with trivial successive quotients is exactly a chain of subspaces in a basis as above, and conversely.
(b) Unipotent groups. The group is unipotent if every nonzero rational representation of has a nonzero -fixed vector, equivalently if every simple rational representation of is one-dimensional with trivial action. Because every rational representation is a union of finite-dimensional subrepresentations (Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule), it suffices to test finite-dimensional representations: is unipotent if and only if every nonzero finite-dimensional rational representation has a nonzero fixed vector.
No smoothness, reducedness or connectedness of is imposed; the matrix formulation in (a) is written out because the group scheme of upper unitriangular matrices is introduced separately and is not used in the definition.
Depends on
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Affine schemes and their coordinate rings
- Group schemes of finite type over a field
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes
- Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme
- Vector space over a field
- Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule
Used by
- Rational modules need not be semisimple in characteristic p Counterexample
- The fixed point theorem fails without completeness: the additive group acts on the affine line by translations Counterexample
- Parabolic subgroups of an affine algebraic group Definition
- Primitive vectors for a Borel pair Definition
- Radical, unipotent radical, semisimple and reductive algebraic groups Definition
- Trigonalizable algebraic groups Definition
- Upper unitriangular groups are unipotent, and the additive group is U₂ Example
- A nontrivial smooth connected unipotent group with split torus action over a perfect field has a stable central Gₐ Lemma
- A subgroup that is both unipotent and diagonalizable is trivial Lemma
- Cartan subgroups: conjugacy, density and normalizers Lemma
- Coconnected Hopf algebras give fixed vectors in every nonzero comodule Lemma
- Connected groups of rank zero are unipotent Lemma
- Maximal tori, field extensions, normal subgroups and derived groups Lemma
- Power maps with exponent prime to the characteristic are bijective on unipotent groups Lemma
- Properties of the derived subgroup of an algebraic group Lemma
- Structure of connected nilpotent groups and the maximal-torus criterion Lemma
- Trigonalizable groups, invariant flags and embeddings into Tₙ Lemma
- Unipotence is equivalent to unipotence of all finite-dimensional representations Lemma
- Primitive vectors of the induced coordinate module Proposition
- Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group Theorem
- Chevalley's centralizer theorem and reductive centralizers Theorem
- Complete reducibility of rational modules in characteristic zero Theorem
- Simple rational representations have a unique highest weight Theorem
- Splitting trigonalizable extensions: algebraically closed fields and two perfect-field cases Theorem
- Unipotent groups are exactly the subgroups of some Uₙ, equivalently the groups with coconnected coordinate Hopf algebra Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)