How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primitive vectors of the induced coordinate module
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be the induced coordinate module of a split reductive group with Borel and unipotent radical (The induced coordinate module E(lambda)). If , then the space of -fixed elements is one-dimensional, its nonzero elements are primitive vectors of weight (Primitive vectors for a Borel pair), and evaluation at the identity is an isomorphism . In particular if and only if contains a primitive vector of weight , unique up to scalar.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A split reductive group with Borel , unipotent radical , opposite Borel , and an element with as in the cited definition.
Big cell. , , is an open immersion onto a dense open subscheme of , and is smooth, hence reduced (Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group).
Determination on the big cell. Two elements of agreeing on the image of agree on : morphisms from the reduced scheme equal on a dense open are equal (Agreement on a schematically dense open).
The action on . For put . For one has ; in particular is fixed by every exactly when is invariant under right translation by (The induced coordinate module E(lambda), Rational representations of an affine group scheme are comodules of its coordinate Hopf algebra).
Unipotent fixed vectors. A nonzero rational representation of the unipotent group has a nonzero -fixed vector; and a -invariant regular function on is constant, since right-translation invariance gives by translating the identity by (Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations).
Translation law. for , , and for (The induced coordinate module E(lambda)).
Proof
If vanishes on , then : by [F5] vanishes on the whole big cell [F1], and [F2] applies.
If , then : is a nonzero rational representation of the unipotent group , so it has a nonzero fixed vector by [F4].
For the function is invariant under right translation by for every by [F3], hence constant by [F4]; its constant value is , so is determined by the scalar . Consequently the -linear evaluation map , , is injective; by step 1.2 it is nonzero (a nonzero fixed vector has by step 1.1), so is one-dimensional and evaluation is an isomorphism onto .
Let . For one has by [F5], so and is a -eigenvector of weight . Since is -fixed, it is primitive of weight by the definition.
Conversely, a primitive vector of weight in is -fixed, hence lies in the one-dimensional space of step 2.1; so it is unique up to a nonzero scalar, and its existence forces . Together with steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 this proves all assertions.
Remarks
- The statement is the source's Proposition 22.22 in the conventions of this page: the fixed space is for the unipotent radical of the Borel used to define primitive vectors, and the big cell is . The earlier scaffold's formulation with was corrected here; the computations for in the example show that is not the one-dimensional space of primitive vectors.
- The one-dimensionality of is what makes the primitive vector "unique up to scalar" and underlies the classification.
Depends on
- Agreement on a schematically dense open
- The Axiom of Choice
- The induced coordinate module E(lambda)
- Primitive vectors for a Borel pair
- Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations
- Rational representations of an affine group scheme are comodules of its coordinate Hopf algebra
- Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert Steinberg, Lectures on Chevalley Groups (Yale University, 1967; notes prepared by J. Faulkner and R. Wilson) (standard reference, not scraped)