Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The induced coordinate module E(lambda)

Definition

Let (G,T) be a split reductive group over k, and let B0=B− be a provided opposite Borel subgroup. For a provided character of B0 whose restriction to T is λ∈X(T), define E(λ) to be the k-subspace of O(G) (The coordinate Hopf algebra of an affine group scheme) satisfying f(gb)=f(g)λ(b−1) for every k-algebra R, g∈G(R) and b∈B0(R). Here λ on B0 denotes that provided extension. The subspace is stable under the left regular action (gf)(x)=f(g−1x) and hence is a rational G-module (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme). Its underlying subspace and this action are choice-free. In the source convention this is Ind⁡B0G(kλ).

Assuming AC (The Axiom of Choice) for the cited split-Borel structure, B0=U−⋊T by the dimension-and-exact-image argument in the Remarks of Primitive vectors for a Borel pair, applied to the opposite Borel. The projection to T extends every λ∈X(T) uniquely to a character of B0 trivial on U−. Thus the construction applies to every weight λ of the given split torus. The same structural input gives B−∩B=T and the open big cells U−B and UB0 (Root subgroups of a split reductive group, Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group, Borel subgroups, maximal tori and Borel pairs).

Remarks

  • Well-definedness. The defining condition is checked on R-points for every k-algebra R; since f is a regular function on the affine group scheme G, the condition is an identity of morphisms and the set E(λ) is a k-subspace of O(G) stable under the left regular action: if f satisfies the condition and g0∈G(R), then (g0f)(xb)=f(g0−1xb)=f(g0−1x)λ(b−1)=(g0f)(x)λ(b−1) for x∈G(R), b∈B0(R), so g0f∈E(λ).
  • The big cell. The opposite Borel B0=B− is the one appearing in the definition, so an element of E(λ) is a function on G whose restriction to each right B0-coset transforms by λ−1; the big cell UB0 is the open cell of the Bruhat decomposition associated with B and B0.
  • Induced module. The identification with Ind⁡B0G(kλ)={f∈Mor⁡(G,A1):f(gb)=b−1f(g)} is the source's definition of the induced module; the translation convention λ(b−1) matches the left regular action used here.
  • Choice scope. For a provided subgroup and character, the equivariance subspace and its left action use no choice principle. AC is inherited only for the supplemental split-Borel projection and big-cell facts above. The comultiplication alone describes right translation, so it is not the coaction label for the left action used here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources