How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a split reductive group over , a Borel subgroup, , , and choose representatives (The root datum of a split reductive group). Then: (a) the double cosets depend only on , are smooth locally closed subvarieties of , and is their disjoint union, ; (b) for every the multiplication map is an isomorphism, and with an affine space of dimension ; (c) the big cell (with the opposite Borel, and ) is open and dense in , the multiplication map is an open immersion, the open dense longest Bruhat cell is , a translate of this opposite big cell. Its flag cell is the unique flag cell of maximal dimension , while the group cell has dimension ; (d) on -points, is the Bruhat decomposition attached to the Tits system of The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system, and the -orbits on are in bijection with the -double cosets of , hence indexed by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a split reductive group with Borel , , , and representatives .
The quadruple is a Tits system, so the double cosets satisfy the standard combinatorial rules and (The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system); the Weyl group acts simply transitively on the Borels containing and (The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers).
The subgroups have the described weight sets, is an isomorphism, and the isotropy group of in is with (Root coordinate cells and generation, Root subgroups of a split reductive group).
For a smooth geometrically connected complete variety with locally affine -action and finite constant fixed scheme, the attracting cells are smooth locally closed affine spaces, with tangent spaces the positive tangent spaces at their fixed points; they are disjoint and cover the underlying space. (The Luna map and the Bialynicki-Birula decomposition)
The flag-stabilizer representation realizes as a smooth projective closed orbit in a projective representation (Milne21.70, also the complete flag construction). Choose a cocharacter in the dominant chamber separating the finitely many torus weights of this representation; its fixed scheme on the projective representation equals the -fixed scheme, so the same is true on . Smoothness of torus-fixed schemes and the Weyl/Borel correspondence identify this fixed scheme with the finite constant points . Semi-invariant homogeneous coordinates provide invariant affine open charts, so the action is locally affine. (Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups, The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers, Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions, Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete, A Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is the stabilizer of a maximal flag)
Every nonzero rational representation of a unipotent group has a nonzero fixed vector, and each vector belongs to a finite-dimensional rational submodule. (Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations, Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule) Cocharacter opposite multiplication is an open immersion, and for a regular dominant cocharacter. (Cocharacter limit subgroups, Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups)
Proof
Given: AC and the split reductive Borel pair of the Statement.
Put . The projective representation and separated torus weights in [F4] identify the chosen cocharacter's fixed scheme with the finite constant set . Invariant affine charts verify the local-affineness hypothesis of [F3]; is smooth geometrically connected and complete by [F4]. Thus [F3] gives attracting cells . Their positive tangent spaces at are the positive root spaces in , indexed by , so . The construction is over and does not replace the torus scheme by the possibly nondense set over a finite field.
Over an algebraic closure the orbit lies in : conjugation by the cocharacter contracts to identity and fixes . This orbit is closed in the affine cell. Indeed, in its reduced affine closure a nonempty boundary would have a nonzero stable ideal. By [F5] a nonzero element lies in a finite-dimensional stable submodule of that ideal and yields a nonzero invariant function. That function is constant on the transitive orbit, hence on its reduced dense closure; the constant is nonzero because the function is nonzero, contradicting its vanishing on the boundary. Thus there is no boundary. By [F2], the orbit is isomorphic to and has dimension , equal to the irreducible affine space ; being closed it is all of . Equality of these smooth locally closed schemes descends to . Hence is the disjoint union of these -orbits, independently of the Tits-system covering argument.
Since and normalizes , the inverse image of in is . The product isomorphism follows by ordering the complementary root coordinates first in [F2]. The subgroup is the orbit stabilizer, so moving its second factor across gives . Pull back the -torsor along the isomorphism . It has the explicit section , and therefore multiplication is an isomorphism . These smooth locally closed cells are disjoint and cover because their flag cells do. Changing by an element of does not change the cell. This proves(a),(b).
For the regular dominant cocharacter, [F5] gives the open immersion . Since with its split torus and positive root groups, it is exactly the multiplication open immersion with image . It is dense because is geometrically integral. The longest Weyl element sends to , so ; both are open dense, but they are not asserted equal. Root combinatorics give and no other has this length. Thus is the unique flag cell of maximal dimension , while its group cell has dimension . This proves(c).
The scheme isomorphisms in step 3.1 are over , so they give ; no inference from geometric density to arbitrary-field point generation is needed. Likewise every -point of lies in one of its -defined affine cells and has a representative , so acts transitively on . Fixing the first flag in a pair leaves its stabilizer acting on the second; hence the orbits on are the -double cosets, indexed by . The corresponding Tits data and inclusion rule are those of [F1], now with the actual point decomposition established. This proves(d).
Depends on
- Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations
- Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule
- Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces
- Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions
- Cocharacter limit subgroups
- Root coordinate cells and generation
- The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system
- The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers
- Root subgroups of a split reductive group
- The Luna map and the Bialynicki-Birula decomposition
- Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups
- The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete
- A Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is the stabilizer of a maximal flag
- The Axiom of Choice
- The root datum of a split reductive group
Used by
- The induced coordinate module E(lambda) Definition
- Root groups and Bruhat cells for SL₂ Example
- Standard parabolics in GLₙ Example
- Central characters and descent along a central isogeny Lemma
- Every dominant weight of a split semisimple group is a primitive weight Lemma
- Modules generated by a primitive vector Proposition
- Primitive vectors of the induced coordinate module Proposition
- Parabolic subgroups and Levi decomposition Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Conrad, Reductive Group Schemes (SGA 3 summer school, Luminy; Panoramas et Syntheses) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)