Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bruhat decomposition for a split reductive group

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let (G,T) be a split reductive group over k, B⊇T a Borel subgroup, U=Bu, W=NG(T)/T, and choose representatives nw∈NG(T)(k) (The root datum of a split reductive group). Then: (a) the double cosets BnwB depend only on w, are smooth locally closed subvarieties of G, and G is their disjoint union, G=⨆w∈WBwB=⨆w∈WBnwB=⨆w∈WUwnwB; (b) for every w the multiplication map Uw×B→BnwB is an isomorphism, and G/B=⨆wY(w) with Y(w)=UwB/B≅An(w) an affine space of dimension n(w)=∣Φ+∩wΦ−∣; (c) the big cell B−B=U−TB (with B− the opposite Borel, B−∩B=T and U−=Bu−) is open and dense in G, the multiplication map U−×T×U→G is an open immersion, the open dense longest Bruhat cell is Bnw0B=nw0(B−B), a translate of this opposite big cell. Its flag cell Y(w0) is the unique flag cell of maximal dimension ∣Φ+∣, while the group cell has dimension dim⁡G; (d) on k-points, G(k)=⨆wB(k)wB(k) is the Bruhat decomposition attached to the Tits system of The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system, and the G(k)-orbits on (G/B)(k)×(G/B)(k) are in bijection with the B(k)-double cosets of G(k), hence indexed by W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a split reductive group (G,T) with Borel B⊇T, U=Bu, W=NG(T)/T, and representatives nw∈NG(T)(k).

[F1]

The quadruple (G(k),B(k),NG(T)(k),S) is a Tits system, so the double cosets B(k)wB(k) satisfy the standard combinatorial rules and G(k)=⨆wB(k)wB(k) (The simple-reflection double-coset rule and the Tits system); the Weyl group acts simply transitively on the Borels containing T and nwUαnw−1=Uwα (The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers).

[F2]

The subgroups Uw,Uw⊆U have the described weight sets, Uw×Uw→U is an isomorphism, and the isotropy group of wB/B in U is Uw with dim⁡(UwB/B)=n(w) (Root coordinate cells and generation, Root subgroups of a split reductive group).

[F3]

For a smooth geometrically connected complete variety with locally affine Gm-action and finite constant fixed scheme, the attracting cells are smooth locally closed affine spaces, with tangent spaces the positive tangent spaces at their fixed points; they are disjoint and cover the underlying space. (The Luna map and the Bialynicki-Birula decomposition)

[F4]

The flag-stabilizer representation realizes G/B as a smooth projective closed orbit in a projective representation (Milne21.70, also the complete flag construction). Choose a cocharacter in the dominant chamber separating the finitely many torus weights of this representation; its fixed scheme on the projective representation equals the T-fixed scheme, so the same is true on G/B. Smoothness of torus-fixed schemes and the Weyl/Borel correspondence identify this fixed scheme with the finite constant points nwB. Semi-invariant homogeneous coordinates provide invariant affine open charts, so the action is locally affine. (Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups, The Weyl group, Borel subgroups and chambers, Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions, Representations of diagonalizable groups split into character eigenspaces, The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete, A Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is the stabilizer of a maximal flag)

[F5]

Every nonzero rational representation of a unipotent group has a nonzero fixed vector, and each vector belongs to a finite-dimensional rational submodule. (Unipotent algebraic groups and unipotent representations, Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule) Cocharacter opposite multiplication is an open immersion, and B=PG(λ) for a regular dominant cocharacter. (Cocharacter limit subgroups, Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups)

Proof

Given: AC and the split reductive Borel pair of the Statement.

1.1F4F3F2

Put X=G/B. The projective representation and separated torus weights in [F4] identify the chosen cocharacter's fixed scheme with the finite constant set {nwB}. Invariant affine charts verify the local-affineness hypothesis of [F3]; X is smooth geometrically connected and complete by [F4]. Thus [F3] gives attracting cells Y(w). Their positive tangent spaces at nwB are the positive root spaces in g/Ad⁡(nw)b, indexed by Φ+∩wΦ−, so dim⁡Y(w)=n(w). The construction is over k and does not replace the torus scheme by the possibly nondense set T(k) over a finite field.

2.1F5F2F3step 1.1

Over an algebraic closure the orbit UnwB/B lies in Y(w): conjugation by the cocharacter contracts U to identity and fixes nwB. This orbit is closed in the affine cell. Indeed, in its reduced affine closure a nonempty boundary would have a nonzero stable ideal. By [F5] a nonzero element lies in a finite-dimensional stable submodule of that ideal and yields a nonzero invariant function. That function is constant on the transitive orbit, hence on its reduced dense closure; the constant is nonzero because the function is nonzero, contradicting its vanishing on the boundary. Thus there is no boundary. By [F2], the orbit is isomorphic to Uw and has dimension n(w), equal to the irreducible affine space Y(w); being closed it is all of Y(w). Equality of these smooth locally closed schemes descends to k. Hence X is the disjoint union of these U-orbits, independently of the Tits-system covering argument.

3.1F2F1step 2.1

Since B=UT and nw normalizes T, the inverse image of Y(w) in G is BnwB=UnwB. The product isomorphism Uw×Uw→U follows by ordering the complementary root coordinates first in [F2]. The subgroup Uw=U∩nwBnw−1 is the orbit stabilizer, so moving its second factor across nw gives UnwB=UwnwB. Pull back the B-torsor G→G/B along the isomorphism Uw→Y(w). It has the explicit section u↦unw, and therefore multiplication (u,b)↦unwb is an isomorphism Uw×B→BnwB. These smooth locally closed cells are disjoint and cover G because their flag cells do. Changing nw by an element of T does not change the cell. This proves(a),(b).

4.1F5F1F2step 3.1

For the regular dominant cocharacter, [F5] gives the open immersion U−×B→G. Since B=TU with its split torus and positive root groups, it is exactly the multiplication open immersion U−×T×U→G with image B−B. It is dense because G is geometrically integral. The longest Weyl element sends B to B−, so Bnw0B=nw0(B−B); both are open dense, but they are not asserted equal. Root combinatorics give n(w0)=∣Φ+∣ and no other w has this length. Thus Y(w0) is the unique flag cell of maximal dimension ∣Φ+∣, while its group cell has dimension dim⁡B+∣Φ+∣=dim⁡G. This proves(c).

5.1F1F2step 3.1step 4.1∎

The scheme isomorphisms in step 3.1 are over k, so they give G(k)=⨆wUw(k)nwB(k)=⨆wB(k)nwB(k); no inference from geometric density to arbitrary-field point generation is needed. Likewise every k-point of G/B lies in one of its k-defined affine cells and has a representative unw∈G(k), so G(k) acts transitively on (G/B)(k). Fixing the first flag in a pair leaves its stabilizer B(k) acting on the second; hence the orbits on (G/B)(k)×(G/B)(k) are the B(k)-double cosets, indexed by W. The corresponding Tits data and inclusion rule are those of [F1], now with the actual point decomposition established. This proves(d).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources