How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Borel subgroups and the opposition of root groups
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a split reductive group over and let . Every Borel subgroup of containing contains exactly one of the two root groups , , and is a Borel subgroup of ; exactly two Borel subgroups of contain , namely and . Moreover, for a cocharacter of that is regular ( for all roots ), is the unique Borel subgroup of containing with , and induces a bijection from the set of Weyl chambers onto the set of Borel subgroups containing .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a split reductive group over and a root .
is split reductive of semisimple rank with roots and root groups , and , are its two Borel subgroups containing ; a Borel contains iff its Lie algebra contains (Root subgroups of a split reductive group, Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one).
For a cocharacter , the groups , and are smooth; is connected for reductive , is connected unipotent, and with (Cocharacter limit subgroups). If is regular, the zero-weight part is , so (Milne, Proposition 21.29).
Over an algebraically closed field, for a torus , the intersection is a Borel subgroup of (Milne, paragraph 17.72). Borel subgroups containing a fixed maximal torus are conjugate by its normalizer (Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field; Milne, Proposition 17.11). The torus and the root groups for the positive weights of a regular cocharacter generate (Milne, Proposition 21.29); this use does not require an all-characteristics closed-weight-set criterion.
Proof
Work first over an algebraic closure. Put and . Since , the centralizer-intersection theorem [F3] says that is a Borel subgroup of containing . The rank-one classification [F1] says that it is therefore exactly or , which proves that contains exactly one of the two root groups. The two rank-one Borels and the intersection are defined over , so these equalities descend to ; the same argument applies to geometric Borels containing the split torus.
Let be regular. By [F2], contains , is smooth connected and has Lie algebra , hence equals by dimension. Thus is smooth connected solvable. Over an algebraic closure it lies in a Borel containing . Its Lie algebra is . By step 1.1 and the root-group containment criterion [F1], the Lie algebra of contains exactly one of each opposite pair of root spaces. It already contains the indicated positive ones, so . The inclusion of smooth connected groups of equal dimension implies . If contains with this same Lie algebra, the containment criterion puts every positive root group in ; by [F3] these root groups and generate , so and equality follows again by dimension. These equalities descend to , proving the claimed Borel and uniqueness assertions.
The Lie algebra in step 2.1 determines precisely the signs of , so two regular cocharacters give the same Borel exactly when they lie in the same Weyl chamber. Each chamber contains an integral cocharacter because its defining strict inequalities have integral coefficients. For surjectivity, fix such a and let be any geometric Borel containing . Normalizer conjugacy [F3] gives for some over the algebraic closure. Conjugation of the limit definition gives . The cocharacter belongs to the lattice of the split torus , so is defined over . Consequently every such Borel equals for a -cocharacter , and descent proves the asserted bijection over .
Depends on
- Root subgroups of a split reductive group
- Classification of split reductive groups of semisimple rank one
- Cocharacter limit subgroups
- Borel subgroups, maximal tori and Borel pairs
- Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field
- The quotient of a connected group by a Borel subgroup of maximal dimension is complete
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Florian Herzig, Linear Algebraic Groups (University of Toronto lecture notes, 2013) (standard reference, not scraped)