Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Torsors under the additive group over an affine scheme are trivial

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring and let S=Spec⁡R. Let Ga=Spec⁡R[t] be the additive group scheme over R, with comultiplication Δ(t)=t⊗1+1⊗t, counit ε(t)=0 and antipode S(t)=−t, so that Ga(T)=OT(T) as an additive group for every S-scheme T.

A Ga-torsor over S is an S-scheme π:X→S that is faithfully flat and finitely presented, together with an action α:Ga×SX→X of Ga on X over S such that the shear morphism σ:Ga×SX→X×SX,σ(g,x)=(g⋅x,x) is an isomorphism. Then X is trivial: there is an isomorphism X≅Ga×SS=AR1 of S-schemes, and in particular π admits a section S→X.

The Axiom of Choice enters through the fppf descent of scheme morphisms used below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring R, the affine base S=Spec⁡R, and a Ga-torsor π:X→S with action α and shear isomorphism σ.

[F1]

The given morphism X→S is flat, surjective, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. An affine morphism is quasi-compact, and a flat surjective morphism is faithfully flat (Faithfully flat scheme morphism, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms).

[F2]

Open immersions are flat and locally of finite presentation; flatness and local finite presentation are preserved by composition; and a finite disjoint union of affine schemes is affine (Open immersions of schemes, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings, The spectrum of a finite product ring is the disjoint union of the factor spectra).

[F3]

Fibre products of affine schemes over S=Spec⁡R are affine with the tensor-product coordinate ring (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products).

[F4]

For a faithfully flat ring map R→B, the Amitsur complex 0→R→B→d0B⊗RB→d1B⊗RB⊗RB,d0(b)=b⊗1−1⊗b, is exact, where d1(c)=c⊗1−c13+1⊗c in the three tensor slots. Thus every 1-cocycle in B⊗RB is d0(b) for some b∈B (Stacks Project, Descent, Lemma 35.3.6, tag 023M; already recorded above as a source).

[F5]

Under AC, a morphism f′:X′→Z descends uniquely along a faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented map p:X′→X exactly when its two pullbacks to X′×XX′ agree (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, The Axiom of Choice).

[F6]

The action satisfies α(g,α(g′,x))=α(g+g′,x), and the shear isomorphism gives a unique group element carrying one point of a fibre to another. Also Ga(T)=OT(T) by the group-scheme description in the Statement.

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring R, and the Ga-torsor π:X→S with action α and shear isomorphism σ(g,x)=(g⋅x,x).

1.1F1F2F3

If S=∅, faithful flatness forces X=∅ and the claim is immediate. Otherwise X is quasi-compact because X→S is of finite presentation, so choose a finite affine open cover {Ui} of X. Its finite disjoint union U=∐iUi=Spec⁡B is affine by [F2]. The map p:U→S is flat because each Ui→X is an open immersion and X→S is flat; it is surjective because the Ui cover X and X→S is surjective; and it is locally of finite presentation by composition. It is quasi-compact because it is affine. Thus p is faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. Write S=Spec⁡R, so R→B is faithfully flat by [F1], and [F3] identifies the affine fibre products of U over S with the corresponding tensor products. Let u:U→X be the covering morphism.

2.1step 1.1F3F4F6

On U×SU, let u1,u2 be the two pullbacks of u. The shear isomorphism gives a unique morphism δ:U×SU→Ga with u2=δ⋅u1. By [F3], δ is an element of B⊗RB. On U×SU×SU, uniqueness and the group law give δ13=δ12+δ23, so d1(δ)=0 in the Amitsur complex of [F4]. Exactness gives b∈B with δ=b⊗1−1⊗b, where the two tensor slots correspond to the first and second copies of U.

3.1F4F5step 2.1F6

Regard b∈B=OU(U) as a morphism U→Ga and set v=b⋅u:U→X. On U×SU, v2=b2⋅u2=(b2+δ12)⋅u1=b1⋅u1=v1, since δ12=b1−b2. Hence the two pullbacks of v agree. By [F5], v descends to a morphism s:S→X; since π∘v=p, uniqueness in [F5] gives π∘s=id⁡S. Thus s is a section.

4.1F6step 3.1∎

Define Φ:Ga×SS→X by Φ(g,z)=g⋅s(z). Applying σ−1 to the morphism X→X×SX, y↦(y,s(π(y))), gives a morphism y↦(g(y),s(π(y))) with g(y)∈Ga. The map y↦(g(y),π(y)) is inverse to Φ: one composite is the identity by the defining equation g(y)⋅s(π(y))=y, and the other by uniqueness in the shear isomorphism. Therefore X≅AR1 over S, and s is the required section.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources