How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Torsors under the additive group over an affine scheme are trivial
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring and let . Let be the additive group scheme over , with comultiplication , counit and antipode , so that as an additive group for every -scheme .
A -torsor over is an -scheme that is faithfully flat and finitely presented, together with an action of on over such that the shear morphism is an isomorphism. Then is trivial: there is an isomorphism of -schemes, and in particular admits a section .
The Axiom of Choice enters through the fppf descent of scheme morphisms used below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring , the affine base , and a -torsor with action and shear isomorphism .
The given morphism is flat, surjective, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. An affine morphism is quasi-compact, and a flat surjective morphism is faithfully flat (Faithfully flat scheme morphism, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms).
Open immersions are flat and locally of finite presentation; flatness and local finite presentation are preserved by composition; and a finite disjoint union of affine schemes is affine (Open immersions of schemes, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings, The spectrum of a finite product ring is the disjoint union of the factor spectra).
Fibre products of affine schemes over are affine with the tensor-product coordinate ring (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products).
For a faithfully flat ring map , the Amitsur complex is exact, where in the three tensor slots. Thus every -cocycle in is for some (Stacks Project, Descent, Lemma 35.3.6, tag 023M; already recorded above as a source).
Under AC, a morphism descends uniquely along a faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented map exactly when its two pullbacks to agree (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, The Axiom of Choice).
The action satisfies , and the shear isomorphism gives a unique group element carrying one point of a fibre to another. Also by the group-scheme description in the Statement.
Proof
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring , and the -torsor with action and shear isomorphism .
If , faithful flatness forces and the claim is immediate. Otherwise is quasi-compact because is of finite presentation, so choose a finite affine open cover of . Its finite disjoint union is affine by [F2]. The map is flat because each is an open immersion and is flat; it is surjective because the cover and is surjective; and it is locally of finite presentation by composition. It is quasi-compact because it is affine. Thus is faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. Write , so is faithfully flat by [F1], and [F3] identifies the affine fibre products of over with the corresponding tensor products. Let be the covering morphism.
On , let be the two pullbacks of . The shear isomorphism gives a unique morphism with . By [F3], is an element of . On , uniqueness and the group law give , so in the Amitsur complex of [F4]. Exactness gives with , where the two tensor slots correspond to the first and second copies of .
Regard as a morphism and set . On , , since . Hence the two pullbacks of agree. By [F5], descends to a morphism ; since , uniqueness in [F5] gives . Thus is a section.
Define by . Applying to the morphism , , gives a morphism with . The map is inverse to : one composite is the identity by the defining equation , and the other by uniqueness in the shear isomorphism. Therefore over , and is the required section.
Depends on
- Affine schemes and their coordinate rings
- The Axiom of Choice
- Faithfully flat scheme morphism
- Open immersions of schemes
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms
- The spectrum of a finite product ring is the disjoint union of the factor spectra
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
- Flatness is transitive under a flat change of rings
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
Used by
- Extensions of multiplicative-type groups by a one-dimensional vector group with a linear action split Proposition
- Conjugacy of diagonalizable complements and maximal subgroups under smoothness hypotheses Theorem
- Splitting trigonalizable extensions: algebraically closed fields and two perfect-field cases Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Descent, Lemma 35.3.6 (exactness of the extended Amitsur complex) (standard reference, not scraped)