How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. For any scheme , a morphism descends to a unique morphism exactly when its two pullbacks to agree. Consequently represented scheme functors are sheaves for the fppf topology.
Facts & Assumptions
Faithfully flat scalar extension detects zero modules; flat finite-presentation morphisms are open. (Descent of vanishing along a faithfully flat morphism, Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open)
Affine fibre products have tensor-product rings, and morphisms to affine schemes correspond to maps on global sections. (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)
Proof
Given: AC, , , , , and with the stated compatibility.
For any faithfully flat ring map , is an equalizer. Check exactness after the faithful flat tensor extension by . The extended sequence is , with the first arrow . That arrow is split by multiplication. If has equal images in the triple tensor product, applying multiplication to its first two factors gives , proving exactness. Flatness preserves kernels and cokernels, and their vanishing descends by [F1]; thus the original sequence is exact.
For an affine open , the open is stable under the two relation projections. Any two points of over the same point of lift to a common point of the fibre product: their residue-field tensor product over the base residue field is nonzero. Hence each fibre lies entirely in or entirely outside it. The image is open by [F1], and . Such cover as ranges over an affine target cover.
On an affine open , choose a finite affine open cover of ; quasi-compactness gives finiteness. Its disjoint union is affine, say , and maps faithfully flat to , since restriction of to each open remains flat and the union is onto. The restriction of to this cover, with affine target , gives a ring map whose two composites into agree. By step 1.1 it takes values in , yielding a unique morphism . The same equalizer shows that its pullback agrees with on the whole , by checking on these affine opens.
The descended morphisms agree on overlaps: their pullbacks agree, and the equalizer argument on affine source covers detects equality. Thus they glue uniquely on . Conversely every pulled-back morphism satisfies compatibility. For a family of fppf covers, work over an affine open of , take affine source opens whose open images cover it, and select finitely many by quasi-compactness. Their disjoint union is a faithfully flat affine refinement of the family to which the same argument applies. This proves the sheaf condition and uniqueness for represented functors. AC is inherited from [F1] and the scheme-affine-cover suppliers.
Depends on
Used by
- A split affine extension of an abelian variety Example
- Affineness and finiteness of morphisms descend under fppf base change Lemma
- Finite field descent is effective for schemes with affine-contained descent orbits Lemma
- Pseudo-abelian varieties under separable algebraic extension Lemma
- A flat equivalence relation with a suitable quasi-section has a scheme quotient Theorem
- Finite locally free affine equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients Theorem
- Finite locally free equivalence quotients exist when orbits lie in affine opens Theorem
- Normal subgroup quotients of finite-type group schemes exist as fppf scheme quotients Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Descent, faithfully flat descent of morphisms (standard reference, not scraped)
- SGA3, Expose IV, represented sheaves and effective equivalence relations (standard reference, not scraped)